Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor
REDD notes

REDD notes: 11 August 2020

Posted on 11 August 202011 August 2020

By Chris Lang

I’ve been on holiday, so this week’s REDD notes covers the last month. Follow @reddmonitor on Twitter for more links to news about forests, the climate crisis, natural climate solutions, the oil industry, greenwash, carbon offsetting, etc.

Greenpeace documents fires in Brazil’s Amazon

In 2020, fires in Brazil’s Amazon could be even more devastating than last year. In July 2020, Greenpeace flew over the state of Mato Grosso. The photographs Greenpeace took show how ineffective the government’s ban on forest fires has been.

With more than 4,000 hotspots, Mato Grosso has the highest number of fires in the Brazilian Amazon so far this year. Greenpeace states that,

To properly protect the forest and its Peoples, the Brazilian government must properly fund environmental agencies, reinforce environmental laws and protect the rights of Indigenous Peoples.

No peatland fires in Indonesia this year?

In July 2020, Nazir Foead, the head Indonesia’s Peatland Restoration Agency (BRG), told Channel News Asia that he is “very optimistic” there will be no fires this year in peatlands under BRG’s supervision. Indonesia’s meteorological, climatological, and geophysical agency (BMkG) predicts a wetter dry season this year.

There are about 2.6 million hectares of peatland in seven Indonesian provinces (Riau, Jambi, South Sumatra, West Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan, South Kalimantan, and Papua). Of this total, about 1.7 million hectares are inside corporate concessions, and are the responsibility of palm oil, pulp and paper, and timber companies.

Foead’s BRG is responsible for 900,000 hectares of peatland on non-concession lands. Foead told Channel News Asia that 89% of the peatland on non-concession peatland had been restored by the end of 2019.

In July 2020, the Jakarta Post reported that BRG’s tenure will expire at the end of this year unless it is renewed. As part of a streamlining exercise, the government is considering whether BRG’s responsibilities could be taken over by other ministries, such as the National Disaster Mitigation Agency and the Agriculture Ministry.

Apple promises to be “carbon neutral by 2030

Apple is the latest tech company to announce that it is going “carbon neutral”. Apple has previously announced other climate targets, aimed for example at powering all its facilities with renewable energy.

Apple aims to cut 75% of its emissions within 10 years. The remaining 25% will be addressed by a “carbon solutions fund”. This is the offset part of the deal, which will invest in “the restoration and protection of forests and natural ecosystems globally”.

Apple will work in partnership with Conservation International, for example through the Chyulu Hills REDD+ project in Kenya.

Shell buys Australian carbon farming project developer Select Carbon

Shell is buying Select Carbon, an Australian company that develops carbon farming projects. The deal is still pending regulatory approval. RenewEconomy reports Shell Australia as saying that this is the first global acquisition for the company’s “nature based solutions” business.

Shell has set a target of “net zero emissions” by 2050. Shell Australia chairman Tony Nunan told RenewEconomy that Shell aims to reduce “the emissions footprint of the energy the company sells to customers”, and to offset or capture emissions for industries “that are hard to switch to zero emissions alternatives”.

REDD-Monitor wrote about Shell’s US$300 million investment in natural climate solutions in April 2019:

Shell’s Nunan told RenewEconomy that,

“The scale of Australia’s rangelands, ecological diversity and integrity of intact primary forests make this market a natural choice for Shell’s first acquisition globally for our Nature-Based Solutions business and to further scale Shell’s investment in this area here in Australia.”

Select Carbon has set up more than 70 offset projects covering an area of 9 million hectares in Australia since it was founded in 2010.

Tesla’s carbon credit profits

Since the start of the coronavirus pandemic Tesla’s share price has gone up about five-fold. Tesla’s total value is now bigger than than Toyota, even though Toyota sells 25 times as many cars as Tesla.

In the first half of this year, Tesla sold fewer cars than the same period last year, and made less revenue. But Tesla sold US$428 million of carbon credits, cut costs, and made a US$104 million profit.

In May 2020, Elon Musk, Tesla’s CEO got a US$700 million bonus. With Tesla’s recent share price increase, Musk will get an additional US$2.1 billion. Musk owns 20% of Tesla. When Tesla’s share price goes up, Musk’s wealth goes up.

Last year, Fiat Chrysler “pooled” its more polluting cars with Tesla’s. Fiat Chrysler thus avoided paying a fine under EU regulations, and can continue to manufacture polluting cars. This is a clear loophole in EU climate regulations.

Forbes notes that “To date, Tesla has reported $3.1 billion in lucrative [carbon] credit sales, which are essentially free money.”

WWF helps greenwash P&G

In July 2020, WWF and Proctor and Gamble announced a project “to advance restoration in the Atlantic Forest on Brazil’s eastern coast”. WWF comments that,

As companies work to meet their own sustainability goals, many are recognizing that it’s no longer enough to just reduce emissions within their own operations and supply chains. They are starting to redirect their work to where it can be most impactful: at the nexus of climate and nature.

The reality is that this is greenwash. As Bloomberg points out, P&G is “moving to cut some of its climate-warming emissions, while continuing to send the vast majority into the atmosphere”. 98% of P&G’s emissions are produced in its supply chain or through the use of goods by consumers.

P&G’s greenwash relies mainly on offsets, not emission reductions. In addition to WWF, P&G will fund tree-planting in California through a project run by the Arbor Day Foundation, and mangrove protection in the Philippines through a Conservation International project.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!