Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

REDD notes: 13 July 2020

Posted on 13 July 202017 August 2020

By Chris Lang

This week’s REDD notes. Follow @reddmonitor on Twitter for more links to news about forests, the climate crisis, natural climate solutions, the oil industry, greenwash, carbon offsetting, etc.

1.5°C threshold could be reached in the next five years

An assessment by the World Meteorological Organisation states that there’s a 24% chance of one year in the next five years exceeding 1.5°C above pre-industrial temperatures. There is a 70% chance that temperatures will be above the 1.5°C threshold in one or more months in the next five years.

On CarbonBrief, Richard Betts of the Met Office Hadley Centre, explains that,

While this is another reminder of the Earth’s rising temperatures, it is important to note that it would not mean that the Paris Agreement’s long-term goal to limit warming to 1.5C will have been breached.

This is because the warming limit refers specifically to long-term human-caused warming and not the added effect of natural fluctuations in the climate.

The planet is heating up at between 0.1°C and 0.3°C per decade. At this rate average temperatures will reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2050. Betts notes that the WMO forecast does not change this prediction.

Brazil bans Amazon fires

Investors with more than US$4.5 trillion in assets wrote to Brazil’s government demanding a stop to the environmental destruction that has increased since president Jair Bolsonaro took office in January 2019. Last month, fires in Brazil’s Amazon hit a new record.

On 9 July 2020, Brazil’s government arranged a video conference in response to the investors’ letter. During the conference the government said it would put in place a 120-day ban on setting fires in the Amazon.

Reuters quotes Jeanett Bergan, head of responsible investment at Norwegian pension fund KLP, as saying, “We really appreciate the dialogue but we hope it will contribute to concrete results on the ground.”

Some firms are threatening to divest from Brazil if Bolsonaro’s government fails to address deforestation.

Brazil and the EU: Sacrificing forests and rights on the altar of trade

In a new briefing on Brazil and the EU, Fern notes Brazil’s deepening economic, political and health crises and asks “when will the European Union (EU) end its complicity in the unfolding catastrophe?”

The EU is Brazil’s second largest trading partner. Much of the trade consists of agricultural goods such as soy and beef, that are driving the destruction of the Amazon and the Cerrado.

In 2019, the EU finalised a Free Trade Agreement with the Mercosur countries. The deal has not yet been signed, and Austria, Walloon and the Netherlands have rejected the deal in its current form. The deal would allow 99,000 tonnes of beef to be imported tariff-free: “sacrificing forests and rights on the altar of trade”, as Fern puts it.

Tree planting frenzy threatens grasslands

The Trillion Tree Campaing, the Trillion Trees initiative, the Bonn Challenge, 8 billion trees, the African Forest Landscape Initiative. These are just some of the on-going tree planting campaigns.

A recent article in SciDev.net points out vast tree planting drives could post a threat to ancient grasslands. “Vast, empty, plantable spaces mostly do not exist,” the article notes.

And where trees are planted, there are impacts:

A study published earlier this year looked at the consequences, over decades, of tree-planting near rivers. Trees planted on natural grassland where the soil is healthy decrease river flow significantly. And the system does not bounce back: the reduction in river flow lasts for at least half a century, found the scientists from Cambridge University.

The “plantation carbon conundrum”

Climate News Network reports on six new studies looking at the problems with the tree planting frenzy:

  • As land surfaces warm rapidly, would-be foresters might see their investments literally going up in smoke
  • Poorly-designed policies could deliver plantations that end up absorbing far less carbon than anyone hoped for, and at a cost to natural wilderness and biodiversity
  • In temperate zones, rising temperatures and extended drought could mean that many trees will die
  • How effectively newly planted forests absorb atmospheric carbon depends on a suite of factors: among them tree species, the history of the land newly-planted, and the type of soil around the roots
  • Because natural forests directly or indirectly support four out of every five species living on land, the loss of tree canopy is already changing the numbers and variety of global wildlife
  • And finally, as temperatures go up, the appetite of the most prolific species for atmospheric carbon could dwindle – meaning that forests planted to slow climate change will be increasingly ineffective.

ICAO declines to answer journalist questions

The German newspaper taz recently sent some questions to the UN aviation body, the International Civil Aviation Organisation, following ICAO’s decision to dilute its carbon offsetting scheme down to homeopathic potency.

ICAO’s press office replied that she was “dismayed” that the taz, “continues the same misinformation that we find in other neoliberal media”. She declined to reply because, “the current assessment is that it is pointless to support you”.

The taz has previously criticised ICAO policy on the perfectly reasonable grounds that it will not address the impact of flying on the climate. ICAO replied to the taz:

“In light of your past false allegations and allegations, we currently consider you to be committed to bad faith and someone who is not legitimately interested in taking an accurate and balanced look at what ICAO was created for.”

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!