Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam

Posted on 23 October 202023 October 2020
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

By Chris Lang

Earlier this week, REDD-Monitor received an email from “John”. John had been cold called by Simon Humphries, who claimed to be from a company called Williams & Gray. Humphries told John that Williams & Gray could sell the carbon credits he had been scammed into buying years ago for more than £20 each. But John would first have to pay a “reformatting” fee of 74 pence per credit.

On 12 October 2020, Colin Cumming left a comment on REDD-Monitor:

Just been contacted by a company called Williams & Gray ltd saying that they can reformat ver’s to EEA’s for £2.81 and sell them on the European market for £22.55 another scammer?

This is a ridiculously obvious scam. Here are the red flags:

red flag Humphries asked asked John to contact the Carbon Credit Registry to “verify all details”. The Carbon Credit Registry is a recovery room scam. REDD-Monitor wrote about the scam two weeks ago:

Following REDD-Monitor’s post, the Carbon Credit Registry’s website has been suspended, but the scammers are still running the same scam.

red flagA company called Williams & Gray Limited does exist. It was registered in 1922. According to the company’s 2019 Financial Statement, the company “operates two Honda main dealership franchises based in Clitheroe and Blackburn”.

But that’s not the company that is cold calling people about their worthless carbon credits. The scammers have cloned Williams & Gray. REDD-Monitor has written to Williams & Gray’s solicitors and accountants to let them know.

red flagThe scammers’ website was registered in September 2020. The website was registered anonymously. Needless to say, there’s nothing on the website about selling Honda cars. Instead, it’s full of the usual nonsense found on boiler room websites.

Much of the text on the website is cut and pasted from other companies’ websites. Here are a couple of examples:

The clone Williams & Gray website is on the left, with the original text on Jupiter Fund Management’s website and London & Capital’s website on the right.

red flagThe scammers behind the clone Williams & Gray sent John a six-page document titled “Terms of Service”. I think it’s safe to say that the scammers are working on the assumption that “no one reads terms of service”.

A large part of the Terms of Service is gobbledygook. For example, here’s a section titled “Terms and Conditions”:

The terms of agreement is to enable the asset to be released from current ownership unless the governing body formally terminates the project or there is mutual written consent of both parties. Upton Five business days This Agreement may be terminated at any time by the Issuer, upon five business days’ prior notice to such effect to the Underwriter, or by the Underwriter upon five business days’ prior notice to such effect to the Issuer.

red flagWilliams & Gray is not registered by the Financial Conduct Authority. Investors who hand their money over to companies not registered by the Financial Conduct Authority have no recourse to the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

The scammers’ Terms of Service includes the following lie:

If your are the sole owner of the assets and they are attached to your name you should fit the criteria of the Financial services Compensation Scheme entitling you to a full refund of any payable agency fee.

red flagWilliams & Gray is the most recent company to have been cloned as part of this recovery room scam. Some of the companies cloned (so far) include Charles Dickens, W.J.Tatem, Chloride Eastern, and Carbon Credit Registry. No doubt more companies will be cloned. The Financial Conduct Authority has taken no action whatsoever against the scammers, and has not even bothered to list the cloned companies on its website.

If you are contacted by “Williams & Gray”, “Charles Dickens”, “W.J.Tatem”, “Chloride Eastern”, “Carbon Credit Registry” (or any other company that claims to be able to sell the carbon credits that you were scammed into buying as an investment) please report them to Action Fraud, and the Financial Conduct Authority. Do not send the company money under any circumstances.

 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

4 thoughts on “The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam”

  1. Miriam says:
    23 October 2020 at 8:54 pm

    I too have been contacted by a James Vickers from USA WHO WISHES TO INTRODUCE ME TO A BUYER of my carbon shares

  2. Chris Lang says:
    23 October 2020 at 9:45 pm

    @Miriam – Thanks for this. I’m sorry this is still going on! Did James Vickers say which company he was working for? Or which company is supposed to buy the carbon credits? (It’s a scam, by the way – as you know you’re on a sucker list – anyone who contacts you out of the blue claiming to be able to sell your carbon credits is a scammer.)

  3. Miriam says:
    26 October 2020 at 11:05 am

    Thank you. The company to contact me is apparently Danish. This hasn’t happened yet.. James V said that they are an introduction co. Who check the validity of the shares and they charge 1.5% from the sum obtained from sale.

  4. Chris Lang says:
    29 October 2020 at 2:41 pm

    @Miriam – It’s a scam. Please do not send these scammers any money. Please report them to Action Fraud and the Financial Conduct Authority.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“But the big elephant in the room is the fact that if you want to use market mechanisms you need the demand. Until the countries pledge to legally binding targets to reduce their emissions, it’s all somewhat of a moot discussion.”

— Dan Barry, Global Director of Clean Energy, Gazprom Marketing & Trading Limited, July 2011

Recent Posts

  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Some questions for Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of Plant-for-the-Planet

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Chris Lang on Why has the Financial Conduct Authority not taken down the website of the clone scam “Good Investment Advisors”?

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!