Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Results-based payments for REDD, but cash on the nail for Climate Advisers

Posted on 15 September 201413 November 2018

Climate Advisers is a Washington-based think tank. As an anonymous Guest Post on REDD-Monitor revealed last week, it’s the think tank behind the New York Declaration on forests, set to be launched at the UN Climate Summit in New York next week.

Climate Advisers has a bit of a history with controversial sign-on statements about REDD. In 2009, Climate Advisers “facilitated” an agreement aiming to “Harness the power of U.S. carbon markets” to save the rainforests.

Following on from this agreement, Climate Advisers created and staffed the Commission on Climate and Tropical Forests. According to Climate Advisers, this “included the ‘cream of the cream’ of US public policy elites and national business and civil society leaders.

What Climate Advisers describes as the ‘cream of the cream’ was a toxic mixture of polluting companies and pro-carbon trading BINGOs. The agreement saw The Nature Conservancy, Environmental Defense Fund, Conservation International and Wildlife Conservation Society in bed with American Electric Power, Duke Energy, El Paso Corporation, Marriott International, PG&E Corporation, Starbucks Coffee Company, and The Walt Disney Company.

Creating demand for REDD+

Climate Advisers is currently working with the Center for Global Development on a Norwegian-funded project called “Creating demand for REDD+”.

The project aims to “strive to foster an international consensus in support of enhanced results-based REDD+ financing”. It aims to double results-based REDD funding globally and from the USA.

Climate Advisers will receive 55% of the US$5.4 million grant from Norway over the three year period of the project. Development Today reveals that “Norad officials had concerns about the high rates charged and the role of the consultant, Climate Advisers.”

Nigel Purvis, the founder, President and CEO of Climate Advisers, told Norad that the sums “reflect billable rates, not salaries” and include “all our overhead costs”.

Poverty alleviation – for Climate Advisers

But Development Today reports that according to a Norad breakdown, Purvis is paid at an hourly rate of US$639. For his work over the three-year period of the project, Purvis will pocket US$383,400.

Of course, Climate Advisers isn’t asking for results-based payments from Norway for its services. On 30 September 2013, Purvis wrote to Knud Nyfløt at Norad, asking him to help avoid any “financial hardship”, for Purvis and his colleagues:

I wonder whether you might have any news on when we might receive comments from Norad on the project document we submitted in early June. Right now we are self-financing our Norad supported program and, as you will appreciate, this is a bit of a financial challenge. We would greatly appreciate any assistance you might provide to expedite the review. As it could take us time to address comments you may have and then perhaps additional time for Norad to review our revised submission, it seems there’s a risk of not receiving the second tranche of 2013 funding until November or December, which could create additional, unintended financial hardship.

In fact, one project document admits that Climate Advisers and the Center for Global Development may well not achieve the results specified in the project:

[T]he probability of success on our most ambitious goals – doubling global, US and Indonesian REDD+ finance – may be only 50%, smaller if the timeframe for success is confined to the three years of the project proposal.

Purvis “spearheaded the creation” of the FCPF

Purvis has an interesting history. Before founding Climate Advisers, he was a “leader in US REDD+ policy”. He was a senior US climate negotiator until 2002, then between 2005 and 2007 he was global vice president for The Nature Conservancy.

Project documents submitted to Norad reveal that while Purvis was at TNC, “among other things he spearheaded the creation of the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF)”.

It’s a fascinating revelation. The World Bank’s carbon trading mechanism for REDD was “spearheaded” by a vice president of TNC, a US BINGO with several forest conservation projects that it hopes to finance through carbon trading.

TNC was a founding member of the FCPF, sits on the governing panel of the FCPF and donated US$5 million (along with BP) when the FCPF was launched in Bali in 2007. The chair of the Carbon Fund is TNC’s Duncan Marsh. Cosy.
 

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Facebook

1 thought on “Results-based payments for REDD, but cash on the nail for Climate Advisers”

  1. N. Purvis B'Stard says:
    22 September 2014 at 6:57 pm

    So these are the people that are designing REDD+ ‘policies’ mostly in order to take away the livelihoods of the world’s poorest people (subsistence farmers in tropical forests), right? Nice.

    I wonder what Purvis’s carbon footprint looks like compared, say, to a peasant in Amazonas…

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Fábio Alkmin on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance demands proper REDD safeguards and implementation of moratorium on voluntary carbon market REDD projects
  • Kathleen McCroskey on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid a on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam

Recent Posts

  • Stop the Racist Conservation Model!
  • Business as usual at WWF Germany: Conflict of interest allegations; Executive Director resigns; Whistleblower threatened with dismissal; WWF Germany covers up
  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance demands proper REDD safeguards and implementation of moratorium on voluntary carbon market REDD projects
  • “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Recent Comments

  • Fábio Alkmin on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance demands proper REDD safeguards and implementation of moratorium on voluntary carbon market REDD projects
  • Kathleen McCroskey on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid a on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!