Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor
Guaraqueçaba, The Nature Conservancy

Community voices on The Nature Conservancy’s Guaraqueçaba Climate Action Project: “We’re suffering here to help them over there”

Posted on 7 June 201213 December 2020
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

“It would be better if we’d never heard of SPVS in this region,” says a farmer in Guaraqueçaba in southeastern Brazil, referring to Brazilian NGO Sociedade de Pesquisa em Vida Selvagem e Educacao Ambiemental. SPVS is the local organisation that The Nature Conservancy hired to run its carbon project.

On its website, the Nature Conservancy describes the project as a “model project”. TNC boasts about its work with local communities living in the project area. “The Guaraqueçaba Climate Action Project proves that what’s good for nature is also good for people,” TNC explains. Miguel Calmon used to be TNC’s forest carbon director in Latin America. According to him,

“It was very important to the Conservancy to ensure that local people had a stake in keeping the forests around Guaraqueçaba standing. Everyone has to make a living somehow — so if you can’t farm or ranch, how can your family earn money? That’s why we and our partners have involved so many community members in income-generating, sustainable enterprises.”

A short video released this week by FERN consists entirely of interviews with farmers affected by TNC’s carbon project. It opens with a community member explaining that, “This video is to show a bit what we’re doing here and how we think. We don’t want to destroy. We want to preserve.”

One community member talks about being “hemmed in” by SPVS. They were promised work, but “there’s no work”. Another man explains that, in the past,

“No one needed to leave the community in order to find work. Today there’s no work here. If you don’t leave to find work there just isn’t enough to support a family. You have to go to the city, but there’s no work.”

“It’s a very mysterious project,” one woman says. “And we still haven’t seen any results from it.” SPVS does not talk to the community, “just the once when they first arrived”, says one man. Even then, SPVS just wanted to set rules for the villagers.

“There’s no more freedom here”, says one man. “They buy this, buy that, till there’s nowhere for us to go.”

One of the villagers sums up the situation. TNC stands for both The Nature Conservancy and Transnational Corporations – to the community at Guaraqueçaba they are one and the same:

“It’s a game that only has economic aims. It favours the big businesses and the NGOs. They don’t care about the environment, they care about profit, the NGOs as much as the businesses; through carbon credits, they keep polluting, they keep earning more. And it’s the community that pays the price for all of this.”

 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

1 thought on “Community voices on The Nature Conservancy’s Guaraqueçaba Climate Action Project: “We’re suffering here to help them over there””

  1. Ilmarinen Vogel says:
    8 June 2012 at 9:05 am

    what is it going to take to realize that carbon tading is a fraud to put sand into the eyes of the caring public. we must get to a point where we begin to hold companies accountable by not purchasing their goods. The economic feedback loop is going to shut them down. lets put all this good energy into identifying those comanies that are doing the right thing. with our purchases and investments we reward them. be surprised by the power of the informed consumer.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“What we should be discussing is not floors on price, but governments setting more ambitious targets, which in turn would result in a higher short-term price until such time that the market achieves those targets and the price falls again. The best-case scenario is a very ambitious target and a low price, which would be an indication that the target is close to being achieved.”

— James Emanuel, head of environmental markets at STX Services BV, October 2011

Recent Posts

  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Some questions for Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of Plant-for-the-Planet

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Chris Lang on Why has the Financial Conduct Authority not taken down the website of the clone scam “Good Investment Advisors”?

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!