Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor
Guaraqueçaba, The Nature Conservancy

Community voices on The Nature Conservancy’s Guaraqueçaba Climate Action Project: “We’re suffering here to help them over there”

Posted on 7 June 201213 December 2020

“It would be better if we’d never heard of SPVS in this region,” says a farmer in Guaraqueçaba in southeastern Brazil, referring to Brazilian NGO Sociedade de Pesquisa em Vida Selvagem e Educacao Ambiemental. SPVS is the local organisation that The Nature Conservancy hired to run its carbon project.

On its website, the Nature Conservancy describes the project as a “model project”. TNC boasts about its work with local communities living in the project area. “The Guaraqueçaba Climate Action Project proves that what’s good for nature is also good for people,” TNC explains. Miguel Calmon used to be TNC’s forest carbon director in Latin America. According to him,

“It was very important to the Conservancy to ensure that local people had a stake in keeping the forests around Guaraqueçaba standing. Everyone has to make a living somehow — so if you can’t farm or ranch, how can your family earn money? That’s why we and our partners have involved so many community members in income-generating, sustainable enterprises.”

A short video released this week by FERN consists entirely of interviews with farmers affected by TNC’s carbon project. It opens with a community member explaining that, “This video is to show a bit what we’re doing here and how we think. We don’t want to destroy. We want to preserve.”

One community member talks about being “hemmed in” by SPVS. They were promised work, but “there’s no work”. Another man explains that, in the past,

“No one needed to leave the community in order to find work. Today there’s no work here. If you don’t leave to find work there just isn’t enough to support a family. You have to go to the city, but there’s no work.”

“It’s a very mysterious project,” one woman says. “And we still haven’t seen any results from it.” SPVS does not talk to the community, “just the once when they first arrived”, says one man. Even then, SPVS just wanted to set rules for the villagers.

“There’s no more freedom here”, says one man. “They buy this, buy that, till there’s nowhere for us to go.”

One of the villagers sums up the situation. TNC stands for both The Nature Conservancy and Transnational Corporations – to the community at Guaraqueçaba they are one and the same:

“It’s a game that only has economic aims. It favours the big businesses and the NGOs. They don’t care about the environment, they care about profit, the NGOs as much as the businesses; through carbon credits, they keep polluting, they keep earning more. And it’s the community that pays the price for all of this.”

 

1 thought on “Community voices on The Nature Conservancy’s Guaraqueçaba Climate Action Project: “We’re suffering here to help them over there””

  1. Ilmarinen Vogel says:
    8 June 2012 at 9:05 am

    what is it going to take to realize that carbon tading is a fraud to put sand into the eyes of the caring public. we must get to a point where we begin to hold companies accountable by not purchasing their goods. The economic feedback loop is going to shut them down. lets put all this good energy into identifying those comanies that are doing the right thing. with our purchases and investments we reward them. be surprised by the power of the informed consumer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Bobby on Living Investments UK and Hyperion Management are boiler room scams that offered investments in teak plantations in Costa Rica. But will the UK authorities take any action?

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Bobby on Living Investments UK and Hyperion Management are boiler room scams that offered investments in teak plantations in Costa Rica. But will the UK authorities take any action?

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP19 Warsaw COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Green Resources Guest post HBS Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union Finland France Gabon Germany Guyana India Indonesia Kenya Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2026 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!