Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Oil and REDD: Norway pays Center for Global Development to promote REDD in Washington

Posted on 9 September 201425 June 2019

The New York Times recently ran an article about Washington-based think tanks that have received tens of millions of dollars from foreign governments, “while pushing United States government officials to adopt policies that often reflect the donors’ priorities”.

Much of the money going to the think tanks comes from oil-producing countries such as the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Norway.

The article in the Times starts with the example of a US$5 million funding agreement between Norway’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Center for Global Development in Washington DC. The money was for a project called “Creating demand for REDD+”. The project details and emails between CGD and Norad are available here in a 69 page file.

The purpose of the project, which runs for three years from 2013, is

“to reduce tropical deforestation and its impact on people and the climate by substantially increasing the incentives for tropical forest countries to conserve their forests.”

As REDD-Monitor has pointed out repeatedly, while reducing tropical deforestation is a good idea, generating forest carbon credits to allow pollution to continue elsewhere is a bad idea.

CGD supports REDD offsets

CGD is in favour of REDD offsets, as this statement on the webpage about CGD’s Tropical Forests for Climate and Development initiative reveals:

Under REDD+, finance from industrialized countries would be contingent upon recipients achieving verified results and compliance with social and environmental safeguards. Current work on the REDD+ mechanism is seen as a bridge to a future in which industrial countries make ambitious commitments to reduce their own emissions. Some portion of these commitments can be met by paying for reductions in forest countries.

The Center for Global Development paints itself as a an institution that conducts “research and analysis on a wide range of topics related to how policies and actions of the rich and powerful affect poor people in the developing world”. That doesn’t sound like a hired gun working for foreign governments. Except, perhaps, when one of the world’s top oil producers offers US$5 million to promote REDD as a carbon trading mechanism in Washington.

The Times points out that, “Slowing deforestation could buy more time for Norway’s oil companies to continue selling fossil fuels on the global market…”. Recently Norway’s Statoil partnered with Russia’s Rosneft to search for oil in the Arctic.

Foreign Agents?

One issue that The Times article raises is that of the Foreign Agents Registration Act, a US federal law introduced in 1938 aiming to fight a Nazi propaganda campaign in the USA. The law requires US organisations that are paid by foreign governments to register as “foreign agents” with the Justice Department.

“Yikes,” said Todd Moss, the chief operating officer at the Center for Global Development, after being shown dozens of pages of emails between his organization and the government of Norway, which detail how his group would lobby the White House and Congress on behalf of the Norway government. “We will absolutely seek counsel on this.”

And in a statement on its website in response to The Times article, CGD states that,

CGD is of course committed to compliance with all relevant legal requirements. We are reviewing our procedures with the help of outside counsel.

A 2012 internal report commissioned by the Norwegian Foreign Affairs Ministry states that:

“In Washington, it is difficult for a small country to gain access to powerful politicians, bureaucrats and experts. Funding powerful think tanks is one way to gain such access, and some think tanks in Washington are openly conveying that they can service only those foreign governments that provide funding.”

So the Center for Global Development is serving Norway. Fair enough. CGD has to get funding from somewhere. Why shouldn’t Norway fund CGD?

CGD should acknowledge Norwegian funding

But the project agreement between CGD and Norway states that,

The Grant Recipient should, if appropriate, acknowledge Norad’s support in communications and publications related to the Project.

As we might expect, given US$5 million of funding, CGD has written quite a lot about REDD since 2013. Here are just a few examples:

  • 27 August 2014: Can California’s carbon polluters save Brazil’s rainforests?
  • 7 August 2014: A Surprising Indigenous View of REDD+ – Mina Setra and Frances Seymour
  • 7 August 2014: Indigenous Peoples Rights and REDD+

  • 7 April 2014: How Well Are Performance-Based Payments Working? Lessons from Guyana
  • 18 March 2014: Do Trees Grow on Money? The Problem of Attribution

Only the last of these acknowledges Norway’s funding for CGD’s Tropical Forests for Climate and Development initiative. The web page for the initiative itself makes no mention of Norwegian funding.

In a response to the Times article, CGD states, “We are fully transparent about all of our funding sources.” CGD has a “How we are funded” webpage, which does include details about the NORAD funding:

“55% of total grant amount subcontracted to CGD partner, Climate Advisors”, CGD states. That’s where things get really interesting. But that story will have to wait for another day.
 


Full Disclosure: REDD-Monitor has received funding from Rainforest Foundation Norway, which in turn receives money from the Norwegian government. Click here for all of REDD-Monitor’s funding sources.
 

2 thoughts on “Oil and REDD: Norway pays Center for Global Development to promote REDD in Washington”

  1. Michelle Thomasson says:
    12 September 2014 at 8:57 am

    The Times should have pointed out that, “Carbon credits which make investors falsely believe that deforestation can be slowed could buy more time for Norway’s oil companies to continue selling fossil fuels on the global market…”.

  2. May CK says:
    23 September 2014 at 1:20 am

    It is such an irony (and tragedy) that thick haze is currently blanketing Central Kalimantan, the REDD+ Pilot Province, for days emitting large amount of carbon and particulate probably more than REDD+ program could compensate. Let alone the people there who are now choked by the haze.
    http://www.kaltengpos.web.id/berita/detail/11582/kalteng-tanggap-darurat-asap.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!