Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor
Whistleblower on Sabah's Nature Conservation Agreement

Whistleblower on Sabah’s Nature Conservation Agreement: “An obvious con”

Posted on 7 February 20227 February 2022

By Chris Lang

In November 2021, John C. Cannon, a journalist with Mongabay, wrote about a Nature Conservation Agreement between the Sabah State Government and an unknown company called Hoch Standard Pte Ltd, based in Singapore. The deal sets up a carbon trading deal covering an area of more than two million hectares for at least 100 years. Hoch Standard would pocket 30% of the revenue from the project.

Cannon wrote two more articles about the carbon trading deal in November and December 2021.

REDD-Monitor wrote two posts in December 2021. The first post outlines the problems with the Nature Conservation Agreement, the controversy in Sabah – including a letter from the State Attorney-General to Hoch Standard, and looks at the hair-raising background of two of main promoters of the deal, Sabah’s Deputy Chief Minister, Jeffrey Kitingan, and Stan Lassa Golokin:

Whistleblower on Sabah's Nature Conservation Agreement

In the 1980s and 1990s, Kitingan and Golokin were both involved in the Sabah Foundation which was supposed to be carrying out logging operations on a “sustained yield basis”. In fact, the forests were plundered and billions of dollars went missing.

REDD-Monitor’s second post came when the Nature Conservation Agreement was leaked in mid-December:

Whistleblower on Sabah's Nature Conservation Agreement

On 30 November 2021, Adrian Lasimbang, a former senator and Indigenous rights activist, filed a lawsuit with the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak against the state of Sabah.

Whistleblower: “An obvious con”

Last week, Ian Neubauer, a journalist with Al Jazeera, picked up the story.

“It makes me sick to my stomach,” a whistleblower with firsthand knowledge of the Nature Conservation Agreement told Al Jazeera. The whistleblower spoke “on condition of anonymity due to fears of retaliation,” Neubauer writes.

The whistleblower said that,

I got involved in this deal because I knew that if we did it right, Sabah could become the world leader in the monetisation of natural capital and carbon credits. But instead, we created a template other countries can use to pilfer and abuse the system.

“Dr Jeffrey is getting old and I think he is not as sharp as he was because this deal is such an obvious con,” the whistleblower commented. “He’s been misled to think that all we have to do is sit back and the money will come rolling in – the same story we Sabahans were sold in the 1990s with logging. But today carbon is the new gold. I don’t even think he knows he did anything wrong by doing the deal in secret.”

Peter Burgess, Tierra Australia

When Peter Burgess, the CEO of Tierra Australia, an Australian company that brokered the agreement spoke to Mongabay in November 2021, he explained that a process of free, prior and informed consent was not carried out. “If we had to go and sit around every campfire, it would never happen,” Burgess said.

Burgess told Al Jazeera that, “I own a very small company which specialises in analysing [water] catchment functions. We have never been a carbon company, currently not a carbon company and never plan to be one.”

But on 10 November 2021, Yin Shao Loong, a senior research associate at the Khazanah Research Institute, posted a series of screenshots on his Twitter account of Burgess speaking at the virtual International Heart of Borneo conference.

Whistleblower on Sabah's Nature Conservation Agreement

One of Burgess’ slides states,

Enable digital connection into the US$ trillion Carbon, ESG & Green Bond Markets instead of heavy reliance on philanthropy (HOB), ethical investment (HOB), tourism and agriculture which is highly dictated by the physical world economy

Another slide refers to a carbon market of certified emissions reductions worth US$16 trillion.

And another claims that,

Natural Capital Custodians, Indigenous people, global communities and future generations will be the ultimate beneficiaries of conservation and monetisation of the world’s Natural Capital Assets.

“Blockchain underpinned by AI, ML & big data will,” according to Burgess, “eliminate corruption, enhance transparency and deliver immutability, integrity, quality, speed, scale and auditing capability of global NC Projects.”

During the Heart of Borneo webinar, Cynthia Ong, founder of Land Empowerment Animals People in Sabah, asked Peter Burgess the following question:

You emphasise transparency a few times; can you tell us more about the story that came out in Mongabay today concerning a deal that has been signed with Sabah that Sabahans have not been informed about?

Burgess did not answer this question and it was quickly deleted from the chat. Ong subsequently wrote an article for Mongabay about the Nature Conservation Agreement.

Tierra Australia and Hoch Standard

In September 2021, Peter Burgess was a co-author of a paper titled, “Building a Platform and Economic Model to Actualize the Value of Nature Capital to Incentivize Preservation and Conservation over Exploitation of Australian Aboriginal Cultural their Nature Capital Assets and the Nature Capital Assets of the State of Western Australia, the Northern Territory and Sabah Malaysia.”

The paper states that Tierra Australia has partnered with Hoch Standard (and Harvard University, MIT, Cornell University, and the ALCES Group) to develop a

platform, infrastructure and NC intervention strategies for the measuring, storing, and trading of Nature Capital gross productive value (corollary to GDP) with the short term goal of providing greater return on investment for conservation and preservation of NC rather than exploitation of it, and a long term goal of using NC and its productive value as the underlying asset for a stable universal medium of exchange.

The paper also states that a Nature Conservation Agreement was “established” with Sabah on 7 August 2021. Clearly Tierra Australia had big plans to become a carbon company, despite Burgess denying this to Al Jazeera.

Hoch Standard not backed by Temasek

A corporate presentation by Hoch Standard and Tierra Australia mentions Temasek as a partnering financial institution. Temasek is Singapore’s state-owned investment agency.

And on 19 November 2021, at a public meeting in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah’s Deputy Chief Minister Jeffrey Kitingan said “Hoch Standard is a global player, it is backed by Temasek Holding.”

A spokesperson for Temasek told Al Jazeera “we have not been able to identify any link we may have with Hoch Standard”.

When Al Jazeera asked Kitingan about Temasek, he admitted that Hoch Standard was not in fact backed by Temasek.

Kitingan threatens to sue Al Jazeera and Lasimbang

On 4 February 2022, Kitingan put out a statement, suggesting that he knows who the whistleblower is:

Clearly, both Al Jazeera and Lasimbang formed their opinions on the topic based on lies and falsehood fed to them by an individual whose motive is to gain political mileage and instigate the indigenous communities by defaming me.

Kitingan said that the whistleblower was “hell-bent to discredit the deal and even set up his own group to take over the deal”.

Kitingan added that,

I am considering legal action against Al Jazeera and Lasimbang and others who are actively disseminating false information to the public, particularly those that are defaming my name.

Lasimbang welcomed Kitingan’s response. In a statement he said that,

It is in the public interest should he sue me he can clear the air about this controversial and secretive deal.

 

1 thought on “Whistleblower on Sabah’s Nature Conservation Agreement: “An obvious con””

  1. Chris Lang says:
    9 February 2022 at 4:08 pm

    Sarawak Report has written a great article about the Nature Conservation Agreement:

    Was The Scam In The Cancellation Clause Of Sabah’s Secret Give-away Carbon Contract?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP19 Warsaw COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Green Resources Guest post HBS Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union Finland France Gabon Germany Guyana India Indonesia Kenya Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2026 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!