Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor
"Carbon Forest" cryptocurrency scam

Police in China arrest eight suspects in “Carbon Forest” cryptocurrency scam

Posted on 5 January 20225 January 2022

By Chris Lang

On 15 December 2021, police in Lianyuan in Hunan province in China arrested eight people for a “Carbon Forest” cryptocurrency investment scam. According to the Loudi News Network the suspects admitted that they committed a fraud.

cryptocurrency scamThe police in Lianyuan received a report from a member of the public on 15 December 2021 about the fraud. The police acted on the same day, arresting eight people: Wu Mobo, Li Moping, Huang Moxin, Chen Molong, Tang Mo, Zhang Mo, He Mo, and Du Mo. The police seized 16 mobile phones and promotional material from the scammers.

“Carbon Forest” was a fabrication

According to the police investigation, Wu Mobo and others fabricated a “Carbon Forest” investment project using concepts such as “carbon neutrality”.

They designed a “decentralised exchange” outside of China. They created a fictitious cryptocurrency called “TCH”. (To confuse matters, there are two cryptocurrencies with the initials TCH: TigerCash and Thorecash.)

Wu Mobo and his team encouraged victims to invest in “TCH” cryptocurrency, which were supposed to be in turn invested in the “Carbon Forest” project. But there was no “Carbon Forest” project.

Victims bought the “TCH” virtual currency on the scammers’ platform using USDT coins. USDT, or Tether tokens, are the fifth largest cryptocurrency, with about US$78 billion worth of USDT coins in circulation.

The scammers used a multilevel marketing (MLM) scheme to encourage existing investors to recruit new investors into buying the “TCH” cryptocurrency. The scammers claimed that there would be a guaranteed profit.

The scam platform showed increasing values of the “TCH” tokens, but when investors tried to sell their “TCH” tokens they were unable to do so. One victim, called Ms. Wang, invested a total of 60,000 yuan (about US$10,000). When she tried to withdraw her investment, she found that her investment had disappeared, and all the money had been taken by the suspects.

 


I found only one report about this: the Loudi News Network, which is in Chinese. I used Google to translate it. Carbon Pulse included a brief overview of the story in their “Bite-sized updates from around the worldā€ section on 22 December 2021.

I’m posting this on REDD-Monitor because the “cryptocarbon” world is booming, non-transparent, and difficult to understand. This post is part of an on-going series of posts featuring cryptocurrencies and carbon.

If anyone has any more information about any aspect of this “Carbon Forest” story, please let me know in the comments below. Thanks!
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed ā€œ30×30ā€ target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!