Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor
Andrew Ager expert witness

Court of Appeal: Andrew Ager’s behaviour as an expert witness was “egregious”. But that doesn’t mean that carbon scammers are innocent

Posted on 16 March 202116 March 2021

By Chris Lang

In May 2019, a carbon fraud trial collapsed in Southwark Crown Court, after the judge described the prosecution’s expert witness, Andrew Ager, as “not an expert of a suitable calibre”.

As a result, Steven Sulley and seven other men who had sold carbon credits to retail investors walked free. The defence counsel for Steven Sulley, Narita Bahra, argued that the convictions in previous cases where Ager had been an expert witness were “now in question”.

REDD-Monitor wrote about the collapse of the carbon trial in May 2019:

At the beginning of December 2020, at the Court of Appeal in London seven men appealed their convictions. On 3 February 2021, the Court of Appeal’s judgement was released.

Stark criticism

In a post on the law firm 6KBW College Hill’s website, Simon Ray and Leila Gaafar write that, “Although the convictions were found to be safe, both Ager himself and the prosecution came in for stark criticism.”

Ray and Gaafar highlight three points of interest from the judgement:

  • The Court noted that the appellants did not call a defence expert to challenge the substance of Ager’s evidence on key issues. Instead, they focussed on his conduct.
  • The appeal “confirms the high, fact-sensitive bar for appealing against conviction in light of fresh evidence”. The Court of Appeal was critical of Ager and the prosecution’s behaviour, even describing it as “egregious”. But Ager’s behaviour did not “ultimately impact the safety of the jury’s finding”.
  • The Court rejected the argument that Ager was not capable of giving expert evidence.

Abundant evidence of fraud

The Court found that in addition to Ager’s evidence, “there was abundant other evidence that all of these schemes were fraudulent”.

The seven men that appealed their convictions were James Francis Byrne, Dylan Creaven, Andrew Stephen Rowe, Sami Raja, Paul Moore, Michael Moore, and Haydon Driscoll.

There were four cases involving a series of companies: London Carbon Credit Company Limited, Henderson International Associates, Agon Energy Ltd, Lanyard Capital Ltd, Harman Royce Limited, Kendrick Zale Limited, and Burbank of London Ltd.

REDD-Monitor has written about several of these companies:

Andrew Ager expert witness

Andrew Ager expert witness

Andrew Ager expert witness

Andrew Ager expert witness

Andrew Ager expert witness

Andrew Ager expert witness

Andrew Ager expert witness

Andrew Ager expert witness

Andrew Ager expert witness

Andrew Ager expert witness

Andrew Ager expert witness

Andrew Ager expert witness
 

2 thoughts on “Court of Appeal: Andrew Ager’s behaviour as an expert witness was “egregious”. But that doesn’t mean that carbon scammers are innocent”

  1. bredahl says:
    25 November 2021 at 1:33 pm

    Imagine if people like you hadn’t caused all the client held carbon credits to be frozen and inaccessible?

    Current spot VCS price is around $10 per tonne and expected to increase dramatically. The people mentioned here would actually be making a profit.

    Well played sir.

  2. Chris Lang says:
    26 November 2021 at 9:30 am

    @bredahl – Which bit of “there was abundant other evidence that all of these schemes were fraudulent” is too difficult for you to understand?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!