Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

“Great news for the environment!” The aviation industry weakens carbon offsetting scheme even further

Posted on 1 July 20201 July 2020
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

By Chris Lang

The International Civil Aviation Organization‘s Council agreed yesterday to change the baseline year for its Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). Under CORSIA, airlines were supposed to buy carbon credits to offset their emissions above a baseline of the average emissions in 2019 and 2020.

Because of the coronvirus, emissions from aviation are dramatically lower than last year and therefore the baseline would have been much lower. The aviation would have had to buy far more carbon credits at a cost of billions of dollars. ICAO has therefore agreed to change the baseline to 2019 following lobbying from the International Air Transport Association.

Great news for the environment!

ICAO went into full-on Orwellian mode on Twitter, describing this weakening of an already molecular thin attempt to cover up the aviation industry’s ever increasing emissions as “Great news for the environment!”:

CORSIA “worse than nothing”

As Magdalena Heuwieser, a campaigner with the Stay Grounded network, points out, “CORSIA is not a useful instrument for lowering aviation’s climate impact. In fact, it is worse than nothing. That was already the case before the baseline change.”

Heuwieser argues that aviation emissions should be regulated by the UNFCCC, as well as at national and regional levels. Countries should include aviation emissions in their national climate plans and emission budgets. Heuwieser says,

“Emission cuts in aviation in line with the 1.5°C limit are only achievable by reducing flights since offsetting and technological approaches fail to do the job. This structural change of our mobility system has to go along with a just transition for the workers.”

Undermining carbon trading

Annie Petsonk, International Counsel at the Environmental Defense Fund, worries that ICAO’s decision to change the baseline will undermine carbon markets. “Changing baselines is a bad precedent for the development of carbon markets in other countries and sectors,” Petsonk says in a press statement.

The irony is that the threat to the CORSIA scheme is the massively reduced emissions from aviation. The scheme that is supposed to address emissions from aviation stops working when emissions are massively reduced – which of course is exactly what we need in order to address the climate crisis.

Of course, CORSIA was never intended to address emissions from the aviation sector. Its entire purpose is to allow emissions to continue without restraint, while giving the impression of doing something about the climate crisis.

ICAO’s decision to water down CORSIA will massively reduce the demand for carbon credits. Carbon market proponents like EDF’s Petsonk, had hoped that an ever expanding aviation industry relying on offsets would provide a boost to carbon markets. Pollution from aviation would create a steady market for REDD credits, for example, where none has existed before.

Stay Grounded’s Heuweiser explains what’s wrong with CORSIA – beyond the changing baseline:

“CORSIA is a total wreck beyond repair. In fact, it was broken from the very beginning. It covers a tiny fraction of aviation’s projected emissions and completely ignores the huge climate impact of airplane emissions other than CO2. It relies on harmful offsets and biofuels, both neo-colonial measures that shift the problems to communities in the Global South. CORSIA is not only a means for greenwashing aviation: holding on to it also blocks effective regulation and leads to further problems.”

 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“Deforestation accounts for over 20% of all carbon emissions. That’s a big number. That’s more than all the cars, trains, planes and ships in the world combined. It’s low-hanging fruit. If we can stop deforestation, we can find a scalable solution to climate change and we can use that as a way of bridging the gap between what it takes to do other changes that we need to do in our behaviour.”

— Jeff Horowitz, Avoided Deforestation Partners, June 2014

Recent Posts

  • How REDD greenwashes Glencore’s coal mining operations in Colombia
  • The Durban Declaration on Carbon Trading
  • Book review: “Forest Conservation and Sustainability in Indonesia” by Bernice Maxton-Lee
  • Plant for the Planet: Felix Finkbeiner’s fake forests
  • Open letter to the lead authors of ‘Protecting 30% of the Planet for Nature’: “This paper reads to us like a proposal for a new model of colonialism”

Recent Comments

  • Chris Lang on Directors of Tullett Brown, Foxstone Carr, Carvier Limited get 14 year director bans
  • Alan Potkin on The Durban Declaration on Carbon Trading
  • Sabhrina Gita Aninta on Book review: “Forest Conservation and Sustainability in Indonesia” by Bernice Maxton-Lee
  • Erin on Savraj Gata-Aura sentenced to four years in prison for his role in the Bar Works investment scam
  • Lesley Walford on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!