Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Deforestation in West Papua: The role of PT Austindo Nusantara Jaya, The Nature Conservancy, REDD, RSPO, and Wilmar

Posted on 7 August 20145 November 2019
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

West PapuaPT Austindo Nusantara Jaya Tbk (ANJ) is an Indonesian palm oil company, that is clearing forest in West Papua to make way for an oil palm plantation. George Tahija is a commissioner of PT ANJ and a member of both The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Indonesia Chapter Advisory Board and the TNC Asia Pacific Council.

Two weeks ago, REDD-Monitor wrote about a report produced by Greenomics Indonesia highlighting the ongoing destruction and noting the link with TNC Indonesia.

I asked TNC Indonesia for a response. Here’s the brief exchange on Twitter:

Since then, I’ve heard nothing from TNC Indonesia.

Rhett A. Butler at mongabay.com also wrote about Greenomics Indonesia’s report. He had more success with his request for a comment from TNC Indonesia. Here’s how Butler reported TNC Indonesia’s response:

In response to a query from Mongabay.com, TNC called Tahija “a valued member” of its Indonesia Program’s Board of Advisors and its Asia Pacific Council.

“In these capacities Mr. Tahija has been an effective conservation ambassador and advisor,” TNC said.

The organization went on to add that it is working with palm oil companies in a district-level initiative “to demonstrate that palm oil development can be done in a responsible manner at scale”.

“The results of the work will include increased capacity of district governments, tools and approaches for improved corporate and community practices, provincial level socio-economic and environmental analysis and policy dialogue to inform sustainable oil palm development, and policy recommendations on jurisdictional program development and implementation,” TNC stated.

So much for TNC Indonesia, which it seems is unlikely to raise a finger to stop PT ANJ from destroying forests in West Papua.

When I wrote about this two weeks ago, I asked why the Minister of Forestry had awarded the oil palm concessions after the moratorium on new forest concessions came into force. That was the wrong question.

As Sam Lawson noted in a comment following the post, the forest clearing is not in breach of the moratorium. All that happened after the moratorium came into force was that the Minister of Forestry issued forest land releases for existing concessions of the two subsidiaries of PT ANJ. The moratorium does not cover existing concessions. Even concessions that have “received approval in principle” from the Minister of Forestry are excluded. As REDD-Monitor pointed out at the time, this is a massive loophole in the moratorium.

So much for REDD, then. REDD is irrelevant in stopping this case of deforestation for palm oil in West Papua.

But as Jago Wadley pointed out in a comment on REDD-Monitor, the concessions were almost certainly in breach of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil’s 2010 New Plantings Procedure. As Wadley writes this procedure,

“requires any development of the concession to be suspended until HCVF [High Conservation Value Forests] and SEIAs [social and environmental impact assessment] are conducted, and published for comment on the RPSO website”.

Rhett A. Butler at mongabay.com asked PT ANJ about the company’s compliance with the RSPO New Plantings Procedure. Sucipto Maridjan, External Affairs Director at PT ANJ told him that,

“We however admit that as an RSPO member the New Planting requirements were not adhered to and thus an infringement has occurred. In view of this, all activities have been suspended on site and we are now entering into the NPP process.”

RSPO standards have led to stop in the forest destruction for PT ANJ’s plantations in West Papua. At least until the HCVF and SEIA studies are completed.

PT ANJ is a supplier to Wilmar, which committed to a no deforestation policy in December 2013. Here’s the response that mongabay.com got from PT ANJ about this policy:

“ANJ is fully committed to achieving the requirements of the RSPO P&C [Principles and Criteria] through continuous improvement. Although we are aware of the existence of Wilmar’s No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation Policy and the Sustainable Palm Oil Manifesto Standard we are still reviewing these ancillary requirements and are of the opinion that most of these requirements are already embedded within the RSPO P&C. We reiterate that RSPO certification will be our main focus at this point in time and leaving all options open.”

PT ANJ’s argument that Wilmar’s no deforestation policy is “embedded” in the RSPO principles and criteria makes no sense whatsoever. Not least because RSPO accepts conversion of forests to oil palm plantations. Memo to PT ANJ: Replacing forests with monoculture plantations is deforestation. Regardless of whether PT ANJ complies with RSPO, it fails to comply with Wilmar’s no deforestation policy.

And if RSPO certification is PT ANJ’s main focus, why are the company’s operations in West Papua so clearly in breach of RSPO standards?

As Wadley comments, “Investors must be worried.”

Not only does a firm “committed” to the RSPO as its “main focus” immediately wander into RSPO non-compliance, but the very rational to aspire to RSPO certification seems likely to exclude it from doing business with its main trading partner.

To summarise:

  • TNC Indonesia is unlikely to attempt to stop PT ANJ from clearing forests in West Papua (despite, or perhaps because of, the involvement of its board member, George Tahija).
  • REDD is irrelevant (because the concession was issued before the moratorium).
  • RSPO will delay the deforestation (but probably not for long).
  • Wilmar‘s no deforestation policy could stop the deforestation (but only if Wilmar and PT ANJ take it seriously).

 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

2 thoughts on “Deforestation in West Papua: The role of PT Austindo Nusantara Jaya, The Nature Conservancy, REDD, RSPO, and Wilmar”

  1. Jago Wadley says:
    11 August 2014 at 6:06 pm

    The RSPO NPP documents for PT Putera Manunggal Perkasa have now been posted on the RSPO website. http://www.rspo.org/blog/topic/260/anja-_pt_putera_manunggal_perkasa

    According to the RSPO accredited assessors, “Land preparations activities carried out by PT.PMP were not in accordance with the RSPO new planting procedure regarding growers shall not commence any land preparation prior to the expiry of the 30-days period of notification, however following the RSPO New Planting Procedure process, any party wishing to dispute the verification may pursue through the relevant RSPO Complaints and disputes procedures.”

    So, anyone wishing to dispute it should do so before the 5th September.

  2. Robert Hii says:
    15 August 2014 at 4:49 pm

    NPPs filed, nothing to see here folks, go home. Is that how its supposed to end?

    Do we trust the HCV assessment? Should these companies walk way scott free after having failed to meet initial requirements?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“Frankly the discussions are not progressing at all. I find it extremely unlikely that REDD will favor any individual investment at least in the short-term, if ever. It’s hellishly complicated.”

— Pedro Moura Costa, co-founder of EcoSecurities now at E2 Advisors, May 2010

Recent Posts

  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Some questions for Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of Plant-for-the-Planet

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Chris Lang on Why has the Financial Conduct Authority not taken down the website of the clone scam “Good Investment Advisors”?

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!