• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Indonesia’s president signs the decree on forest moratorium: Too little, too late

Posted on 20 May 201119 May 2015

Indonesia’s president, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, yesterday signed a decree to bring into force a two-year moratorium on new forest concessions.

The moratorium was supposed to start in January 2011. The president was given a choice of two decrees to sign. One covered all forests, including peatlands. The other covered only primary forests and peatlands. Yudhoyono chose the latter.

The decree is available here (in Indonesian): “Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2011 Tentang Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru Dan Penyempurnaan Tata Kelola Hutan Alam Primer Dan Lahan Gambut” (pdf file 92.9 KB).

The lead implementer of the moratorium will be the Ministry of Forestry. The decree includes several gaping loopholes. It specifically does not apply to:

  • Existing concessions or concessions that already “received approval in principle” from the Minister of Forestry.
  • “National development” projects including: geothermal, oil and gas, electricity, land for rice and sugar cane.
  • The extension of existing permits.

The reasons for the weak moratorium were outlined by a representative of a Malaysian oil palm company with plantations in Indonesia, who told Reuters that,

“There were lots of pressure on the Indonesian government from the palm oil industry about this ban since we bring in significant investments. Today’s final details show that agreeable concessions have been made.”

Agus Purnomo, President Yudhoyono’s special advisor on climate change, seems keen to reassure the oil palm industry. At a press conference today, reported by Reuters, he said that,

“There is no limitation for those who want to develop business-based plantations. We are not banning firms for palm oil expansion. We are just advising them to do so on secondary forests.”

Yesterday, Purnomo told Reuters that,

“We mean business when we say we would like to reform our forest and peatland management. There will be no new permits on 64 million hectares… We mean business in the sense that we are continuing to grow our economy, because we allocate 35 million hectares of degraded forest for agriculture, mining and other development uses.”

Not surprisingly, share prices in most oil palm companies rose after the decree was announced.

The announcement of the decree has been criticised by NGOs. Nils Hermann Ranum, head of policy at Rainforest Foundation Norway told Reuters that the moratorium would protect only an additional 16 million hectares. “It looks like Indonesia is now making a serious limitation of the scope of the moratorium,” he said.

Paul Winn of Greenpeace Australia-Pacific said,

“This is a bitter disappointment. It will do little to protect Indonesia’s forests and peatlands. Seventy-five percent of the forests purportedly protected by this moratorium are already protected under existing Indonesian law, and the numerous exemptions further erode any environmental benefits.”

Teguh Surya of Walhi (Friends of the Earth Indonesia) told the Jakarta Post that,

“The President ignored input from civil society who care about conserving forests and threw its support to big businesses, such as palm oil plantations.”

The fact that the decree is late is probably not too important in the long run. It will run for two years from today. Whether two years is long enough is, of course, another question. However, the fact that the decree is too little is a disaster for Indonesia’s forests, indigenous peoples and local communities.
 

8 thoughts on “Indonesia’s president signs the decree on forest moratorium: Too little, too late”

  1. Anonymous says:
    20 May 2011 at 7:11 pm

    What about the peatlands? We’re told that peatlands are important to conserve, so a ban on peatland development should have some positive impact? Please enlighten.

  2. Chris Lang says:
    20 May 2011 at 7:42 pm

    @Anonymous – Yes peatlands are, at least in theory, included in the “moratorium” – unless that is, were looking at an existing concession, or the concession has been “approved in principle” by the Ministry of Forestry, or it’s an extension of an existing permit. Or if it’s deemed to be a national development project: geothermal, oil and gas, electricity, land for rice and sugar cane.

    I agree that a ban on peatland development would have some positive impact, but this moratorium doesn’t look like a ban on anything very much, unfortunately.

  3. Hanson says:
    20 May 2011 at 11:40 pm

    Here we are from green community for Sipiso-piso mountain, we had started a tree plantation, and with this forum we had plant 6000 trees at sipiso-piso, and this is from non organization peoples, of course we need help. So the next programme we would invite you to come to participate with us on 1st – 3rd July 2011 on mountain sipiso-piso. for more information you may see on face book FORUM HIJAU DOLOK SIPISO-PISO, and the site. Come and join us. Go Green Indonesia !

  4. may says:
    21 May 2011 at 5:57 am

    Indicative Map of the Forest Moratorium is availabe here:
    http://sipuu.setkab.go.id/PUUdoc/17176/inpres0102011.pdf

    You can see how little are the areas covered by the moratorium especially in Sumatera and Borneo islands. We could say that generally no moratorium for both islands (except for the peatland on the south of Borneo).


    R-M: The link no longer works. A copy of the decree with the indicative map is available here: INPRES-010-2011.pdf.

  5. Marianne says:
    23 May 2011 at 3:08 am

    How to get approach to the indicative map of the forest moratorium? Wrong link or site not available anymore?

  6. Chris Lang says:
    23 May 2011 at 7:34 am

    @Marianne – Thanks for this – the presidential decree complete with indicative map is here: INPRES-101-2011.pdf (pdf file, 439.9 KB). I agree with @may – there are important areas of forest missing from the indicative map.

  7. Paul says:
    23 May 2011 at 1:21 pm

    Thanks for posting this Chris.
    I checked and one can still find the full pdf on the Setkab website if you go back to the home website http://sipuusetkab.go.id and pick “Instruksi Presiden” under the Jenis PUU (type of law) tab. On the President’s website — http://www.presidenri.go.id/index.php/uu/instruksi-presiden/ — the PDF file does not include the map, however.

  8. Chris Lang says:
    26 May 2011 at 1:27 pm

    The decree with the indicative map is available here:

    http://sipuu.setkab.go.id/PUUdoc/17176/INPRES0102011.pdf

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Chris Lang on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Recent Posts

  • Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance letter to Pogio Ghate, Minister for Environment, Conservation and Climate Change
  • Ecomapuá Amazon REDD Project, Brazil: Pública investigation reveals Ecomapuá Conservação is selling “illegal” carbon offsets from land it does not own, without transferring the money to local communities
  • Response from Steve Zwick, Verra: “Verra will ask Kanaka Management Systems to cease and desist any actions that may mislead communities into thinking that Verra has not already rejected the project”
  • Response from Kanaka Management Services: “Please do not conduct legal trail or castigate REDD+ project developers on the website by writing text which shows the project developer in bad light”

Recent Comments

  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Chris Lang on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!