Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

The World Bank’s inability to see deforestation in Peru

Posted on 17 July 201430 January 2015

Earlier this month, more than 100 people flew to Peru to take part in a meeting in the Hilton Hotel in Lima. While they were there, “they demonstrated that innovative climate finance models can help protect forests and mitigate global climate change”.

The meeting was the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s 17th meeting. The comment about innovative climate finance models is the World Bank’s description of what happened during the three day meeting.

Of course, the Bank provides no evidence whatsoever to back up this claim.

In a Feature Story on the its website the Bank explains that,

“Few things inspire policymakers more than success stories from the field. With negotiators from around the world gearing up for the next UN climate meetings in Lima, Peru, in December, it’s an opportune time to showcase what is working.”

And the World Bank wants to showcase REDD as an example of what is working. In the parallel universe inhabited by World Bank staff, Indonesia is one of the countries in which REDD is working.

Indonesia is “known globally as a front runner for REDD+” the Bank tells us. It has a national REDD+ strategy, a national REDD+ Agency, and is making progress on “setting a baseline for its forest carbon against which success in maintaining forests and carbon will be measured”.

There’s one problem with all this: Indonesia’s rate of deforestation, which is the highest in the world. The World Bank seems blissfully unaware of this inconvenient fact. (Even the Union of Concerned Scientists in their recent Panglossian report about deforestation success stories had to admit that, “at present we could not confidently consider Indonesia a success story”.)

The World Bank doesn’t mention Peru’s forests in its puff piece about the FCPF’s meeting in Peru.

In December 2013, Rainforest Rescue started a petition addressed to Peru’s President, Ollanta Humala, calling on him to stop the operations of plantation companies in Loreto and Ucayali regions. Satellite images from NASA clearly show the forest clearance:

When Humala visited Berlin earlier this week, activists from Rainforest Rescue presented Peru’s Environment Minister, Pulgar Vidal, with 139,000 signatures against the destruction of Peru’s forest. Rainforest Rescue is aiming to collect one million signatures before the UN climate meeting (COP20) in Lima in December 2014.

Earlier this month, Survival International reported that,

A highly vulnerable group of uncontacted Amazon Indians has emerged from the rainforest in Brazil near the Peru border and made contact with a settled indigenous community.

According to Survival International,

The Brazilian government believes that the Indians were pushed over the border from Peru due to the failure of the authorities to combat illegal logging and drug trafficking in their territory.

The uncontacted Indians are extremely vulnerable. They have no immunity to common diseases such as flu or measles. Survival International is calling on the governments of Peru and Brazil to protect the uncontacted Indians’ land from illegal loggers and drug traffickers.

Gold mining is also a growing threat to Peru’s forests and rivers. Between 1999 and 2012, the area of illegal gold mining operations increased in Peru by 400%.

In January 2014, CIFOR pointed out that despite the government’s enthusiasm for REDD, deforestation in Peru continues. CIFOR put out a report (in Spanish) titled, “The context of REDD+ in Peru: Drivers, agents and institutions”. Although the rate of deforestation in Peru is low, this is likely to change. The lead author of the report, Hugo Che Piu, explained that,

“These historical deforestation rates do not reflect the effects of new and future interoceanic highways nor the recent agroindustrial expansion in the Amazon.”

Peru also has major plans to expand the exploitation of oil and gas in the country.

As in other countries, REDD is taking place in parallel with the destruction of the forests. Peru is involved in the World Bank’s FCPF and the UN-REDD programme. There are more than 40 forest carbon projects in the country. US$50 million is to come from the World Bank’s Forest Investment Plan.

The Peruvian government claims to be interested in the “co-benefits” of REDD, such as improved livelihoods, better forest governance and biodiversity conservation. But as Che Piu points out,

“[T]he funding streams proposed in the RPP for monitoring of carbon are 20 times the funds proposed for monitoring the social and environmental impacts.”

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!