Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Peru approves the expansion of the Camisea gas project into indigenous peoples’ reserve

Posted on 30 January 20143 December 2014
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Peru has given the go-ahead to the expansion of the Camisea gas project onto the land of indigenous peoples living in voluntary isolation. The impacts on the people and their forest will be devastating.

Peru’s Ministry of Culture has approved plans by Pluspetrol (Argentina), Hunt Oil (USA) and Repsol (Spain) to drill more than 20 new wells and carry out seismic tests in a concession called “Lot 88”. But about three-quarters of the concession is inside a reserve established to protect the livelihoods and lands of the indigenous peoples living there.

Hundreds of workers will move into the Kugapakori, Nahua, Nanti and Others’ Reserve, leaving indigenous peoples extremely vulnerable to diseases or epidemics to which they have no immunity.

When Shell carried out explorations in the area in the 1980s, the company cleared paths into the forest. Subsequently loggers used the paths to enter the region. The result was the death of nearly half of the Nahua tribe.

James Anaya, the UN’s Special Rapporteur for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, visited the region in December 2013. In his preliminary observations and recommendations, Anaya wrote,

Clearly these groups are extremely vulnerable, so the government and the company must act with extreme caution and not proceed with the proposed expansion without first ensuring conclusively that their human rights would not be violated.

He also noted Peru’s international obligations under UN Convention 169 on indigenous and tribal peoples, and wrote that,

The government should to carry out a process of consultation with indigenous peoples in the area of Lot 88 before taking a decision on the proposed expansion of the mining project.

In approving the Camisea extension, Peru ignored the UN’s recommendations.

Earlier this month, Forest Peoples Programme produced a detailed report revealing the severe impacts of the Camisea gas project on isolated indigenous peoples.

The Kugapakori-Nahua Reserve was created in 1990, covering an area of 443,887 hectares. It was set up to protect the rights of the Kugapakori and Nahua indigenous peoples.

In 2003, Peru’s President issued a Supreme Decree and an updated map which upgraded the legal status of the reserve. It also changed its name to the Kugapakori-Nahua-Nanti and Others’ Reserve. The aim of the reserve was to protect its “territorial, ecological and economic integrity” for the benefit of the “Kugapakori, Nahua, Nanti and other indigenous peoples” living in “voluntary isolation” and “initial contact”.

The Decree prohibits “development of economic activities” other than those of the people living there, and prohibits granting of “new rights” to exploit natural resources.

The are more than 40 REDD projects in Peru and the government is involved in the World Bank’s Forest Carbon Partnership Facility and the UN-REDD programme. But as in other countries, REDD is taking place in parallel with business as usual. In terms of stopping deforestation (or even reducing it), REDD is irrelevant as long as it fails to address the drivers of deforestation.

A recent report by the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) found that Peru’s rate of deforestation is likely to increase rather than decrease. Mary Menton, one of the authors of the report said,

“Peru is experiencing economic growth. Much of this growth is happening — and is likely to keep on happening — at the expense of the Peruvian Amazon.
 
“All this investment is going on without full consideration of the social and environmental impacts. And there isn’t enough in the way of policies or institutions that serve to protect the forest.”

Commenting specifically about the Camisea expansion project, Conrad Feather of Forest Peoples Programme told to The Guardian,

“The problem with such plans is that they avoid the fundamental question that these peoples, and not the Peruvian government or an oil and gas company, should be determining their own future.
 
“We are being asked to believe that a series of guidelines on paper, however well thought out, are sufficient to address the inherently unpredictable and potentially lethal nature of first contact, a Pandora’s box that once opened, no one, not even a multinational oil and gas company, can control.”

 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“The world is looking for a great example somewhere and wonderfully enough, President Jagdeo’s leadership has quite honestly inspired people around the world, and you really need leadership on something like this if we are able to get progress in Copenhagen. He will be able to show how other countries can follow the emergent Guyana model.”

— Jan Hartke, Clinton Foundation, June 2009

Recent Posts

  • Anatomy of a ‘Nature-Based Solution’: Total oil, 40,000 hectares of disappearing African savannah, Emmanuel Macron, Norwegian and French ‘aid’ to an election-rigging dictator, trees to burn, secret contacts, and dumbstruck conservationists
  • Coalition for Rainforest Nations announces sale of 6,106 REDD credits from Papua New Guinea to Blackstone Energy Services
  • Carbonballs: Nigel Farage, carbon offset lobbyist
  • Kevin Conrad signs REDD deal with Papua New Guinea
  • Court of Appeal upholds conviction of Paul Moore, Michael Moore, and Haydon Driscoll, the men behind the Burbank of London carbon credit investment scam

Recent Comments

  • Abel Ateu on The return of the carbon cowboys: How NIHT Inc failed to get free, prior and informed consent for REDD in New Ireland, Papua New Guinea
  • Sander van den Ende on Kevin Conrad signs REDD deal with Papua New Guinea
  • Eyedeal on “Returns up to 895%” and other misleading statements from Property Frontiers about investments in EcoPlanet Bamboo and Silva Tree
  • Chris Lang on Carbonballs: Nigel Farage, carbon offset lobbyist
  • Steve Zwick on Carbonballs: Nigel Farage, carbon offset lobbyist

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!