Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance demands proper REDD safeguards and implementation of moratorium on voluntary carbon market REDD projects

Posted on 22 May 202222 May 2022

By Chris Lang

On 5 May 2022, the Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance wrote to Pogio Ghate, Minister for Environment, Conservation and Climate Change. Their letter expressed their concerns about the government’s submission of REDD+ Safeguards legislation to the National Executive Council, without having carryied out a consultation process about the final draft of the documents.

On 2 March 2022, Wera Mori, then-Minister of Environment, Conservation and Change issued a Moratorium on voluntary carbon market REDD projects. The NGO’s letter also expressed their concern that the government’s Moratorium was not being implemented.

The NGO’s letter is available here:

Papua New Guinea

The PNG Environmental Alliance took out a full page advertisement in the Post Courier, published on 20 May 2022. The statement repeats the concerns highlighted in the 5 May 2022 letter, in particular the ongoing expansion of the NIHT Toapiyo REDD Project, in breach of the Moratorium on voluntary carbon market REDD projects.

The advertisement is posted below in full, and is available here as a pdf file.

Papua New Guinea

On the 5th of May 2022, the Members of the PNG Environmental Alliance (PNGEA) wrote an urgent letter to Minister for Environment, Conservation and Climate Change, Hon. Pogio Ghate, to voice our grave concerns on two essential matters regarding the development and implementation of REDD+ in our country:

  1. The submission to NEC of final versions of the PNG REDD+ Safeguards (FPIC Guidelines, Benefit Sharing & Distribution System Policy, REDD+ Development Guidelines, Grievance Redress Mechanism) without any stakeholder consultation on the final draft of these documents.
  2. Complete lack of implementation of the Moratorium on new voluntary carbon market projects.

Re 1. While we acknowledge that constructive progress has been made in preparing the draft REDD+ Safeguard Documents, the official Validation Workshop on the REDD+ Safeguard documents on 16 March 2022, was done without final draft versions of the documents being ready. No documents were circulated to stakeholders in advance of the workshop, and only working draft versions were made available during the workshop. The Climate Change & Development Authority (CCDA) refused NGO requests to allow more time and follow proper process, and asked participants to validate incomplete working draft documents at the end of the workshop. The REDD+ Safeguards and resulting Regulations under the Climate Change Management Act (CCMA) form the backbone of our REDD+ implementation system, as they have to safeguard our people against unscrupulous project developers. They need to be developed through a correct and fully transparent process with proper stakeholder consultation at all stages.

Re 2. One of the main reasons for putting a Moratorium on new voluntary forest carbon market projects in place, was to halt all project preparations until the REDD+ Safeguards and the related Regulations under the CCMA are in place. The Moratorium was put in place in March 2022 but is not being enforced, with project developers and their agents continuing to work on new project areas, without any guidance on proper process, due to the lack of safeguards and regulations. These unguided project preparations leading to a growing number of social problems and conflicts, due to, among others, no proper awareness at the community level, lack of proper FPIC process before signing of carbon credit contracts, unclear and non-transparent benefit sharing mechanism, unsupported excessive claims made on future benefits, no sustainable land use planning done, and cash hand-outs to get clans to sign up.

Most of these issues are caused by the expansion activities of an existing carbon project, the NIHT Topaiyo REDD Project. We are deeply concerned that despite the many reports of problems caused by NIHT’s inappropriate approach, CCDA is partnering with them, and allowing them to continue preparations to add new project areas to their grouped project, and even expand beyond the scope of their existing project (ENB & NIP) into other provinces in PNG. NIHT’s project only meets the international Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) requirements, which have proven not to be able to guarantee safeguards like proper FPIC and equitable benefit sharing for our landholding communities. NIHT’s expansion activities have to be guided and controlled by the REDD+ Safeguards and Regulations, and as long as these are not in place, NIHT should not be allowed to expand their activities beyond their current first project area.

REDD+ benefits will come from a national system with nested voluntary market projects, but in order to safeguard the interest of our people and the country, all REDD+ projects need to be properly regulated through a strong national REDD+ implementation system. The most important part of this system is that it needs to be transparent and equitable, appropriate for our PNG customary societies, guarantees permanence of emissions reductions, and ensures the vast majority of REDD+ benefits are reaching the owners and custodians of the land and forests we are talking about, and will be used for long-term improvements of their livelihoods. Project developers should not be allowed to continue project preparation activities while we do not yet have our final Safeguards and Regulations in place, as this creates dangerous precedents, and a situation that will be extremely difficult to remedy.

The current situation with a short-cut of the development process for the REDD+ Safeguards together with the lack of clarification on and enforcement of the Moratorium, is endangering the development and implementation of a transparent and equitable REDD+ system for PNG, and is damaging our international reputation, hence urgent action is needed.

In our letter, we ask Minister Ghate to show his leadership to protect the reputation of the country in REDD+ and the interest of our people by:

    a) Directing CCDA to properly complete the development process of the REDD+ Safeguard document through stakeholder consultation on the final draft versions of the documents, and conducting a real Validation Workshop on their final versions, after processing of the comments received on the final draft versions, with sufficient time allocated for both steps.

    b) Putting out a public notice detailing and explaining the meaning of the Moratorium on new voluntary carbon market projects, i.e., a stop to ALL preparation activities for any projects, including for new project area instances of the existing NIHT grouped project.

We welcome the interest and engagement by investors and communities in PNG towards REDD+ and the Voluntary Carbon Market, and the potential we envisage that it will provide into the future. It is for this reason that it is critically important to ensure all the required regulations and institutional arrangements are developed and in place first, and that systems are functioning to ensure oversight and compliance. Without these in place the prospects for PNG and its resource owners will be jeopardised. Businesses and landowners with a genuine interest and commitment to this mechanism, and the opportunities it provides over the longer term, would surely not wish to jeopardise these prospects by bypassing due process and standards now, but rather would support the steps necessary to put in place these fundamental institutional building blocks.

Papua New Guinea

 

1 thought on “Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance demands proper REDD safeguards and implementation of moratorium on voluntary carbon market REDD projects”

  1. Kathleen McCroskey says:
    23 May 2022 at 5:55 am

    Congratulations to PNG Environmental Alliance! It will be great if you can ensure these regulations come into force before more project approvals. Then an important experiment begins: Can Capitalism still make a “profit” within a rules-based system structure?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!