Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru: “They don’t count deforestation when they don’t want to. And, this is cheating”

Posted on 2 May 20222 May 2022

By Chris Lang

In November 2021, REDD-Monitor posted an article by Simon Counsell about a project in Peru called REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios. The article was based on research carried out into the project for a German NGO, Foodwatch, which exposed the dubious carbon offsets that German supermarket chain Rewe was using to claim that it was selling “climate neutral” chicken breast fillets.

Other buyers of the nearly 10 million carbon offsets sold by the project include German “green energy” supplier Entega, Neutral Flight Inc., Engie Energía Perú, luxury fashion company Giorgio Armani, and British industrial conglomerate Swire.

REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions

And in 2021, the project was chosen to offset the production of non-fungible tokens:

REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions

Foodwatch’s full report is available here.

In November 2021, Rewe stopped buying offsets from the REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions.

But the standards setting organisation, Verra, rejected the criticisms in the Foodwatch report.

One of Foodwatch’s concerns raised in the report was that the deforestation “baseline” was grossly exaggerated to create the appearance of reduced deforestation while deforestation actually increased. Meanwhile, loopholes in Verra’s methodology allowed for huge amounts of emissions to go unaccounted for.

Verra dismissed the criticism:

REDD+ projects are designed to reduce deforestation, not to halt it completely. The deforestation rate in the project area was lower than in the “business-as-usual” scenario (baseline). This indicates that the project was successful.

Enter the rating agencies

This sort of debate about the impossibility of determining whether carbon offsets amount to a geniune reduction of emissions or not is becoming more and more common. Recent articles on Bloomberg, for example, have highlighted a series of dubious carbon offsetting projects.

A series of carbon ratings agencies has sprung up including Calyx, Sylvera, Pachama, Compensate, and BeZero, that are supposed to make it easier for buyers make sure they are buying high quality carbon offsets.

Of course the reality is that carbon offsets are a climate scam that exist in order to allow Big Polluters to continue profiting from pollution for as long as possible. In order to address the climate crisis we have to stop burning fossil fuels. That means leaving them in the ground.

“Ridiculous behaviour”

Recently, Elias Ayrey, a remote sensing scientist, took a look at one of these ratings agencies, BeZero. One of the projects he looked at was the REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions.

When he put out his video, BeZero’s rating of the project was AA+. The AA rating means that “the project has a moderate likelihood of achieving 1 tonne of CO2e avoidance or removal”. The + reflects the project’s “comparative standing within the category”.

Here’s what Ayrey has to say about the project:

REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessionsI want to end by talking about this project, the Brazil Nut Concessions in Peru. Again, AA+ ratings from BeZero. Fantastic, right?

Again, this is one of those projects that I’ve come across that I am just flabbergasted by. Brazil Nuts is an avoided deforestation project, taking place in Peru and there has been intense deforestation inside this project.

You know, this is problematic, right? Like Verra should be notified. We’ve got a reversal on our hands.

Let me tell you about the solution that these guys came up with. Rather than verifying the entire project whenever they want credits, they only verify the bits of the project that weren’t deforested. There are actually bits of this project that were started inside the project, weren’t verified one year because there was deforestation, were verified the next, weren’t verified the next, and then were verified the final time.

So these guys are literally only counting forest conservation when it happens. They don’t count deforestation when they don’t want to. And, this is cheating, obviously BeZero, in case you guys haven’t noticed. And guess what, this isn’t even from the remote sensing imagery, this just by reading the documentation.

So, I mean again, I’m left believing that potentially that these credits are worthless. I don’t know what they’re really worth because one strategy that they’ve used is actually just enroll more land. You know, a lot of these areas, maybe they were deforested. Let’s not count them any more, let’s just enroll them some place next door.

Absolutely ridiculous behaviour from this project. But more ridiculously, behaviour from BeZero.

Shortly after Ayrey put out the video, BeZero changed its rating for the REDD Project in Brazil Nut Concessions. It is currently rated as A. That means, “The credit issued by the project has a low likelihood of achieving 1 tonne of CO2e avoidance or removal.”

REDD Project in Brazil Nut Concessions is still on Pachama’s website

Until September 2021, Ayrey was lead scientist with Pachama. In an interview with REDD-Monitor in February 2020, Diego Saez-Gil, a co-founder of Pachama, explained that “We validate the claims of these projects and are monitoring them via satellite to keep them accountable and give assurance and visibility to all participants in the market about the integrity of the projects.”

In April 2020, Pachama wrote a gushing review of the project and explained that,

While this project is already verified by a third-party carbon protocol body Verra, Pachama provides an additional layer of verification and monitoring using our remote sensing and AI technology.

Rather than rating projects, Pachama states on its website that, “We curate a list of quality forest projects for you.”

Ayrey’s ex-colleagues in Pachama didn’t react to his critique of the REDD Project in Brazil Nut Concessions quite as quickly as BeZero did. Although the project is no longer listed as one of Pachama’s projects, it is still on the Pachama website.

Here’s a screenshot of Pachama’s website (taken today):

REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions

 

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Facebook

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • shahid a on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Recent Posts

  • “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance letter to Pogio Ghate, Minister for Environment, Conservation and Climate Change
  • Ecomapuá Amazon REDD Project, Brazil: Pública investigation reveals Ecomapuá Conservação is selling “illegal” carbon offsets from land it does not own, without transferring the money to local communities
  • Response from Steve Zwick, Verra: “Verra will ask Kanaka Management Systems to cease and desist any actions that may mislead communities into thinking that Verra has not already rejected the project”

Recent Comments

  • shahid a on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!