Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor
Colonial conservation

Colonial conservation: Why an Indigenous Maya community in Belize protested against a visit from Prince William

Posted on 22 March 202213 October 2022

By Chris Lang

Imagine for a moment that you’re running an international conservation organisation based in the UK. It’s the world’s oldest international conservation organisation. Now imagine that the organisation was founded as the Society for the Preservation of the Wild Fauna of the Empire.

Given the controversies about colonialism and conservation, wouldn’t Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge, second in line the to British throne, be the worst possible person to have as your patron?

Yet in October 2020, Prince William took over as patron of Fauna and Flora International (as the Society for the Preservation of the Wild Fauna of the Empire is now called) from his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth.

All of this came (once again) sharply into focus with Prince William spending a week in the Caribbean with his wife, Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge. The trip is aimed at persuading other countries not to become a republic as Barbados did four months ago.

Colonial conservation

Emily Zobel Marshall is an academic at Leeds Beckett University whose work focusses on Caribbean culture. She suggested to The Guardian that the UK government and royals should be working with Caribbean countries to facilitate a discussion about full independence and reparations. She told The Guardian that,

“We’ve had centuries of enslavement, followed by colonialism in the Caribbean. The damage that has been done economically and historically by Britain is vast, and the legacies of that are ongoing. To still have the Queen as the head of state, in this day and age, is baffling to me.

“I think it’s important symbolically not to be a part of that hierarchy. It’s important for Caribbean countries to be proud of themselves in their own right and to be untethered from Britain.”

Colonial conservation: Protests in Belize

William and Kate’s visit started in Belize, where they cancelled a visit to Akte‘il Ha cacao farm in Indian Creek. The Guardian reports that,

Opposition to the royal excursion had arisen from a dispute between residents of Toledo district and Flora and Fauna International (FFI), a conservation charity Prince William is a patron of.

On 18 March 2022, villagers in Indian Creek held a protest against William and Kate’s visit to the cacao farm. The Maya Indigenous community of Indian Creek is currently in a land dispute with Fauna and Flora International. The Maya community claims that FFI took part of their lands in the name of conservation.

William and Kate were not planning to speak to the villagers. And they certainly weren’t interested in hearing about any long-running dispute about land rights.

Instead they were planning to visit a farm owned by Fauna and Flora International. William and Kate’s helicopter was to have landed on the village football pitch – but Indian Creek villagers where not consulted about the trip.

“We don’t want them to land in our land, that’s the message that we want to send, they could land anywhere but not in our land” Sebastian Shol, Chairman of Indian Creek village told 7NewsBelize.

Colonial conservation

And Dionisio Shol, a Youth Leader, told 7NewsBelize,

“For someone like him to say well I’m here promoting conservation, you could actually come talk to the Maya people. Most historians and scientific evidence have shown that Maya people have already done some of this work that they are putting big names to it. So for him to say well I want to save Indian Creek well obviously it’s not happening.

“We are still, Indian Creek is still suffering from the colonial legacy which simply means for us Prince William being a patron to FFI is from the colonial era.”

The Guardian reported that FFI put out a statement explaining that it had bought the land in December 2021, from private owners. A spokesperson for FFI told BBC news that FFI would, “support the livelihoods, educational opportunities and the customary rights of local people”.

“We are establishing a dialogue with key stakeholders about the future ownership and management of land and want to work with – and in support of – the indigenous community, respecting traditional Mayan rights,” he said.

According to The Guardian FFI pledged to maintain “open and continuous dialogue” with the local community.

But on 18 March 2022, Toledo West Area Representative Oscar Requena, called for dialogue between FFI and the villagers of Indian Creek. Which raises an obvious question: If FFI’s claim of “open and continuous dialogue” with the local community were true, why would Requena need to call for dialogue?

According to Requena, the area in dispute covers more than 5,000 hectares of land that the villagers have customarily used for farming, hunting, and for material to build their homes.

Logging concessions and land rights

The Environmental Justice Atlas has more information about the land disputes faced by the Maya in Toledo District. In the early 1990s the Government of Belize started handing out logging concession in Mayan territory without consulting the Indigenous Peoples and afrodescendant communities living there.

In 1996, the Ministry of Natural Resources granted a 200,000 hectare concession to a Malaysian timber company called Atlantic Industries. Two years later, Toledo Maya Cultural Council submitted a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR).

The IACHR ruled that the State of Belize had violated human rights by allowing logging and oil development on Mayan traditional lands. In 2000, the government and Mayan communities signed “Ten Points of Agreement” to recognise Mayan rights over their traditional lands and resources. “Those agreements have been ignored by the State,” Environmental Justice Atlas notes.

A February 2021 editorial in Amandala notes that Indian Creek is one of 38 villages in Toledo District that has customary land rights over their traditional lands, based on a 2010 ruling of the Supreme Court of Belize, subsequently affirmed in 2015 by the Caribbean Court of Justice.

As Alonso Gurmendi, an Assistant Professor at the Universidad del Pacífico in Peru, notes, “Instead of focusing on a setback for a Prince’s tour, news coverage could focus on the claims of an indigenous community fighting for its land and the role said Prince can/should play in resolving it.”
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!