Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor
Smurfit Kappa

Smurfit Kappa is destroying Indigenous Peoples’ land in Colombia while claiming to be “sustainable”. Instead of supporting Indigenous Peoples’ rights, WWF and FSC are helping to greenwash the destruction

Posted on 20 January 202220 January 2022

By Chris Lang

On 13 January 2022, the Smurfit Kappa Group, one of Europe’s largest packaging companies, announced that its emissions reduction targets have been approved by the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) as consistent with the Paris Agreement. According to SBTi, “Smurfit Kappa Group commits to reduce scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions 37.7% per ton of saleable production by 2030 from a 2019 base year.”

The Science Based Targets Initiative was set up by CDP (the NGO formerly known as the Carbon Disclosure Project), the UN Global Compact, World Resources Institute, and WWF. Almost 1,200 companies have made commitments to emission reductions in line with 1.5°C global heating by 2030.

In the press release about SBTi approving Smurfit Kappa’s carbon reduction target, Tony Smurfit, CEO of the Smurfit Kappa Group says that, “Sustainability is at the heart of all our operations, and we have a long-term commitment to protect the planet, its people and all our stakeholders.”

Smurfit Kappa

Smurfit Kappa’s greenwash

The reality is that Smurfit Kappa’s operations are far from “sustainable”.

In Colombia, the company controls 67,270 hectares of which just over 42,000 hectares are industrial tree plantations of pine and eucayptus.

Here’s how a 2020 article in the World Rainforest Movement Bulletin describes how Smurfit Kappa established its monocultures on Indigenous Peoples’ land:

In 1978 the Pulpapel company — now known as SKCC [Smurfit Kappa Cartón de Colombia] — started purchasing land in the department of Cauca, in order to introduce and expand pine tree cultivation in this territory. Some of these properties were in the process of being reclaimed by indigenous paeces communities, who consider this to be ancestral territory. These claims had been ongoing since the 1960s. The indigenous people occupied these properties in order to expel the multinational corporation from their territory. This was also to prevent the expansion of this monoculture, given that in a short amount of time, the multinational company had installed eucalyptus trees in an area of approximately 1000 hectares. These communities witnessed the destruction of native forests and their replacement with timber plantations (eucalyptus and pine).

The army violently evicted Indigenous People from their land to make way for the company’s monocultures.

The Indigenous Misak people, the Nasa people and other communities have lived in the Cauca region in southern Colombia for thousands of years. When Ricardo Carrere of WRM visited the area in 2003, the people living near the plantations told him that,

“the plantations have finished off the water,” that “spraying has finished with everything there was in the soil,” that “there is hardly any fauna left,” that there used to be “clouds of birds” and that now “only in the summer does some bird appear, but not in winter time,” and that “there are no fish left either.”

Regarding employment, they reported “all the work is seasonal” (it is outsourced) and that “the contract implies working for two and earning for one.” Like in the jungle, only the fittest survive: “if you don’t reach production, they remove you, you can’t be over 40 and we all have to be strong to reach that production.” Regarding worker organization, not only is there no trade union, but “he who grumbles is out” and “here no comments are made.”

Smurfit Kappa

Smurfit Kappa: stop destroying Indigenous land in Colombia

The Indigenous Misak people have been struggling against Smurfit Kappa for many years. The company has relied on Colombian security forces to stop their protests.

In August 2021, a young man, Huver Samir Camayo, was shot dead while protesting against Smurfit Kappa’s operations in the region. He was transferred to San José de Popayán hospital, but died from his wounds.

Two days after his murder, the community held a funeral for Huver Samir Camayo, and demonstrated against the police. They attacked the police station and set fire to the mayor’s office in Cajibío.

SumOfUs has set up a petition demanding that Smurfit Kappa gives the lands of the region of the Cauca back to the Misak community. Click on the image below to add your name to the more than 140,000 signatures:

Smurfit Kappa

WWF has partnered with Smurfit Kappa

In 2020, WWF Colombia jumped into bed with Smurfit Kappa. The “new alliance” is supposedly “to improve forestry conservation”, but the reality is that it’s just more greenwash.

The alliance does clearly illustrate, however, whose side WWF is on when it comes to a destructive corporation with lots of money and Indigenous communities who have seen their lands invaded by monoculture tree plantations.

Nevertheless, Sandra Valenzuela, WWF Colombia’s Chief Operating Officer says,

Since 1961, the WWF has worked to develop innovative solutions that protect people, communities and wildlife so we are delighted to have formed this partnership with Smurfit Kappa Colombia.

Even given WWF’s record of corporate obsequiousness, this is ridiculous. Industrial tree plantations do not protect people, communities, and wildlife. They actually threaten to destroy all three.

Smurfit Kappa

Smurfit Kappa’s plantations in Colombia are FSC-certified

Since 2003, Smurfit Kappa’s destructive monoculture plantations have been certified as well managed under the Forest Stewardship Council system.

In 2006, more than 120 organisations and people in Colombia wrote to FSC demanding the “immediate de-certification of the plantations owned by Smurfit Kappa Cartón de Colombia”. At the time, FSC was carrying out a review of its plantation certification policy and the authors of the letter hoped that “the result of this process will be an end to the certification of these types of plantations by the FSC in the future.”

Needless to say, that didn’t happen, and Smurfit Kappa’s industrial tree plantations in Colombia remain FSC certified to this day.

 


PHOTO Credit: Misak Humana
 

1 thought on “Smurfit Kappa is destroying Indigenous Peoples’ land in Colombia while claiming to be “sustainable”. Instead of supporting Indigenous Peoples’ rights, WWF and FSC are helping to greenwash the destruction”

  1. Kathleen McCroskey says:
    1 February 2022 at 2:19 am

    Can you feel the weight of the oppressive boot of Capitalism as it grinds down the Environment and peoples and all other Life that dare to get in its way? It is well illustrated by this story.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP19 Warsaw COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Green Resources Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union Finland France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2026 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!