Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

REDD notes: 26 October 2020

Posted on 26 October 202026 October 2020

By Chris Lang

This week’s REDD notes. Follow @reddmonitor on Twitter for more links to news about forests, the climate crisis, natural climate solutions, the oil industry, greenwash, carbon offsetting, etc.

REDD has failed

Kevin Mulungu is a Zambian PhD student at Colorado State University. In an article on the Africa is a Country website Mulungu writes,

While the rationale and mechanism of REDD+ seem straightforward, the implementation and the results have been unsatisfactory and mired in controversy. Twelve years of REDD+ have been unable to significantly reduce deforestation. In places like Mai-Ndombe in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), REDD+ has failed to both halt deforestation and benefit local communities.

He notes that others have labelled REDD “CO2lonialism”. Africa generates 3% of global greenhouse gases. “At the core of REDD+ are neoliberal and corproate-friendly ideas,” Mulungu writes. These ideas allow polluters to continue polluting, while marginalising the lives of forest depending communities.

Mulungu writes that,

Solutions arrived at in the big conference halls of the West, implemented in developing countries without the full participation of the people, are bound to fail. New ideas that explicitly involve the forest-dependent communities are imperative.

Vietnam signs emissions reductions purchase agreement with the World Bank’s FCPF

Last week, the Vietnam’s Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and the World Bank signed an emissions reduction purchase agreement (ERPA). Under the deal the Carbon Fund will pay Vietnam US$51.5 million if the provinces of Thanh Hóa, Nghệ An, Hà Tĩnh, Quảng_Bình, Quảng Trị, and Thừa Thiên-Huế reduce CO2 emissions by 10.3 million tonnes between 2018 and 2024.

In a press release, Carolyn Turk, the World Bank’s country director for Vietnam said,

Vietnam has shown tremendous leadership in developing robust programs to deliver forest emission reductions at scale. This agreement marks the beginning of a new chapter for Vietnam, where new and significant incentives for forest protection and improved management are now in place to help the country meet its ambitious climate targets.”

Obviously, Turk makes no mention of the fact that Vietnam has exported its destructive logging operations to Cambodia and Laos.

Nikkei Asia’s report on the deal included a comment from REDD-Monitor:

But such arrangements do not really cut emissions, said Chris Lang, founder of the REDD-Monitor blog….

“In order to address the climate crisis, we have to stop burning fossil fuels,” Lang told Nikkei. “Carbon trading makes the climate crisis worse by giving the oil, gas, and coal industries a new lease on life.”

Peru and Switzerland sign carbon offset deal

Peru and Switzerland have signed a bilateral offsets agreement under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Under the deal, Switzerland will continue to pollute and will finance “sustainable development” in Peru.

Gilles Dufrasne, policy officer at Carbon Market Watch, told Climate Change News that the agreement had “several good elements”. It doesn’t. Any emissions reduced in Peru will be cancelled out by continued emissions in Switzerland.

The Swiss KliK Foundation will buy the offsets for Switzerland. KliK Foundation was set up by the Swiss Petroleum Association (since renamed as Avenergy Suisse) to offset part of the emissions from motor fuels. So Peru reduces its emissions while the Swiss can continue driving around in their BMWs.

The EU is planning to plant three billion trees

The EU has announced that as part of its biodiversity strategy for 2030, it will plant three billions trees. “It is time to fix our broken relationship with nature. Climate change, loss of biodiversity, and the spread of devastating pandemics demand it,” the EU’s website states.

Euronews comments that, “While massive reforestation grabs the headlines, experts say tree-planting actually does little to stop what is really messing up the climate, the rampant burning of fossil fuels.”

Sini Eräjää, Greenpeace EU agriculture and forest campaigner, told Euronews,” The potential climate and biodiversity benefits to planting trees are limited, but the risks of greenwashing are endless. Companies are quick to claim credit for the carbon stored in trees planted but reluctant to reduce emissions in the first place.” Exactly.

Climate experts are academia’s most frequest flyers

A new study published in Global Environmental Change finds that climate scientists take “significantly” more flights than other academics. Kevin Anderson, Professor of Energy and Climate Change at the University of Manchester, hasn’t flown since 2006. In 2014, he wrote, “To reduce my own carbon footprint I decided eight years ago that I could no longer justify flying.”

Anderson was not involved in the study. He said that the study made for “uncomfortable” reading:

“This paper must be a catalyst for rapid change. We need to take a long hard look in the mirror, reflect on our research, and rapidly transition to an academia fit for the 21st Century. Perhaps then governments, businesses and wider civil society would take more note of our research and conclusions.”

Forest fires are raging in Bolivia’s lowlands

The International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA) reports that lowland forest fires in the regions of Santa Cruz, Beni, La Paz and Cochabamba are even worse than last year.

“Between the 1st of January and the 31st of July this year [2020], the number of forest fires had increased by 35 per cent in the national territory in comparison with the same time last year. Knowing this has generated an alert, because the numbers show that we are in a process of repeating the tragedy from last year,” Miguel Vargas Delgado, director of the Center for Legal Studies and Social Research (CEJIS) based in Bolivia, said.

CEJIS has established the Center for Autonomous Territorial Planning (CPTA) to monitor the territorial situation of Indigenous communities in the Bolivian lowlands. CPTA reports that 2.1 million hectares in the lowlands were burned by August 2019. “One of the main factors that led to the drastic increase in fires is the expansion of the agricultural frontier,” IWGIA writes.

Alejandro Parellada, IWGIA senior advisor, said, “The recent national elections in Bolivia open a new political scenario where, apart from the re-establishment of a democratically elected government, we hope that there will be greater willingness to meet the demands of Indigenous Peoples, especially in the protection of their territories.”

 

6 thoughts on “REDD notes: 26 October 2020”

  1. Jeremy Sweet says:
    27 October 2020 at 12:23 am

    Do you know anything about Oakbrook Capital
    8 St. James’s Square, St. James’s, London, SW1Y 4JS
    http://www.oakbrookcapitalplc.com
    020-3797-6483
    Company Registration – 09752762

    They are offering to sell VCR in Germany and but need a “Trade Reference Licence Agreement Number” and willing to provide one for £2320 . I have never heard of such an agreement ….

  2. Chris Lang says:
    27 October 2020 at 2:26 pm

    @Jeremy Sweet – Thanks for this.

    As you probably know, “Oakbrook Capital” is a clone of another company. It’s running a recovery room scam. They got in touch with you – because your details are on a sucker list. More about sucker lists and recovery room scams here:

    The cloned “Oakbrook Capital” website was registered 34 days ago.

    You’ve never heard of a “Trade Reference Licence Agreement Number” because there’s no such thing.

    The scammers are asking for an advance fee (for something that doesn’t exist!). Please report them to Action Fraud and the Financial Conduct Authority.

  3. Jeremy Sweet says:
    27 October 2020 at 3:29 pm

    Dear Chris : Many thanks for this. My assumption was a scam but I wanted confirmation .
    Is there any legit trading in VCRs that might take them off me ?
    Best wishes

  4. ALLAN LEE THOMPSON says:
    2 November 2020 at 6:58 pm

    I have been approached by Oakbrook Capital plc to open a capital exchange to arrange for the sale of wine which I held with a trader who has since gone bankrupt.
    I have to pay to them £1220 as an Underwritten Guarantee in order to release £7120 from the proceeds of the sale of the wine. do you recognise this as a scam or is it normal.

  5. Chris Lang says:
    2 November 2020 at 9:15 pm

    @ALLAN LEE THOMPSON – It’s a scam. “Oakland Capital” contacted you. They know you “invested” in wine because you’re on a sucker list. They are asking for an advance fee.

    See my response to @Jeremy Sweet above. Please report this to Action Fraud and to the Financial Conduct Authority. Do not send “Oakbrook Capital” any money. It’s a clone of a real company, and is running a recovery room scam.

  6. Jeremy Sweet says:
    3 November 2020 at 1:19 pm

    they phoned me again yesterday about “tax” payment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!