Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

REDD notes: 21 September 2020

Posted on 22 September 202022 September 2020

By Chris Lang

This week’s REDD notes. Follow @reddmonitor on Twitter for more links to news about forests, the climate crisis, natural climate solutions, the oil industry, greenwash, carbon offsetting, etc.

Colonising the atmosphere

A new analysis published in The Lancet: Planetary Health found that the Global North is responsible for 92% of excess global CO2 emissions. The analysis, by Jason Hick­el, an economic anthropologist, “proposes a novel method for quantifying national responsibility for damages related to climate change by looking at national contributions to cumulative CO2 emissions in excess of the planetary boundary of 350 ppm atmospheric CO2 concentration”.

Hickel told In These Times that his methodology starts from “the position that the atmosphere is a common resource and that all people should have equal access to it within the safe plan­e­tary bound­ary (defined as 350 parts per mil­lion atmos­pher­ic con­cen­tra­tion of CO2)”. His method allows us to answer the question “Who got us into this mess?”

Hickel said,

“We know that the Glob­al South suf­fers more than 90% of the costs of cli­mate break­down, and 98% of the deaths asso­ci­at­ed with cli­mate break­down, due to fires, floods, droughts, famine, dis­ease, dis­place­ment and so on. ​So, just like under colo­nial­ism, the North is ben­e­fit­ting at the expense of the South.”

Richest 1% responsible for double CO2 of poorest 50%

A report by Oxfam and the Stockholm Environment Institute found that between 1990 and 2015, the world’s richest 1% were responsible for more than twice as much CO2 emissions as the poorer 50% of the world.

CO2 emissions rose by 60% over the period. Emissions from the richest 1% increased by three times more than the increase in emissions from the poorer half.

Transport is one of the key drivers of the increase in emissions. People in rich countries are buying more SUVs and other high emitting cars, and are flying more.

California’s carbon offsets are burning

The Lionshead Fire in Oregon burned through one of the largest forest carbon projects that is generating offsets for California’s carbon market. Non-profit organisation CarbonPlan calls for a “systemic appraisal of the effectiveness of California’s offset program in the context of risks posed by a changing climate”.

CarbonPlan summarises the problem:

When trees die — whether through fire, drought, or other ecological processes — much of the carbon stored in roots, wood, and soil is released back into the atmosphere. Many threats to forest carbon permanence will only get worse as the planet warms, increasing the chances that forest carbon will be released to the atmosphere.

By 17 September 2020, about 72% of the ACR260 forest offset project in Oregon had been burned.

Driving fire

Stephen Pyne, fire researcher and emeritus professor at Arizona State University, has written a great op-ed in The Hill under the headline “What’s causing Western wildfires and how to stop them”. His title was “Driving fire”.

Pyne gives a whirlwind history of humanity’s relationship with fire, and how fossil fuels changed that relationship. Forest fires in the USA are not new. In 1910, fires raged in Idaho, Montana, and Washington. For the next 50 years, the US Forest Service tried to eliminate fires. That didn’t work, and by 1978 the policy was fire restoration: control bad fires and promote good fires.

But Florida prescribed burns more than 800,000 hectares. California is three times as big, but only burns 80,000 hectares.

Pyne writes that, “Monster fires raged in the 19th century because of logging and land-clearing slash. They blow up today largely because of climate change acting as a performance enhancer on preexisting conditions.”

He suggests four “general strategies” for managing landscape fire. “Which is right?” he asks. “They all are,” he answers. “The one sure way to failure is to pick a single technique and exclude all the others.”

National emergency declared in Bolivia over forest fires

Xinhua news agency reports that according to Bolivia’s Forest and Land Authority, in the first week of September forest fires have burned an area of almost 600,000 hectares in the region of Santa Cruz de la Sierra. Jeanine Anez Bolivia’s right wing interim president has declared a national emergency.

On 16 September 2020, in the town of San Ignacio de Velasco in Santa Cruz, Anez said,

“Today, something very important and significant is happening: we are presenting two decrees. One to reinforce the fight against fire, and another to repeal the decree that allowed controlled burning.”

Forest fires in Indonesia

The Jakarta Post reports that Indonesian NGO Auriga Nusantara has compiled data from NASA’s Modis satellites between 2001 and 2019.

The data show that land and forest fires regularly occur in seven provinces: Riau, Jambi, South Sumatra, West Kalimantan, South Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan and Papua. But Central Sulawesi, Southeast Sulawesi, and North Kalimantan also risk becoming epicentres of fire. in the past five years an increasing number of forest fires have been recorded in these provinces linked to more logging and establishment of industrial plantations.

Bambang Hero Saharjo, a fire forensics specialist at Bogor Agicultural University critised the government for focussing on mitigation rather than prevention: “Fire prevention should be done before the dry season, but what usually happens is that authorities often start to get busy only when the fires are about to get out of control.”
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!