Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Fortress conservation: Disney’s offsets are paying for heavily armed park rangers in Conservation International’s Alto Mayo REDD project in Peru

Posted on 24 June 20205 December 2021

By Chris Lang

An article in Bloomberg last week takes a detailed look at the Alto Mayo REDD+ project in Peru. Covering an area of 182,000 hectares in the San Martín region of northern Peru, the project is run by Conservation International together with Peru’s National Service for Natural Protected Areas Protected by the State (SERNANP).

Sales of carbon offsets from the project have raised a total of US$30 million, with the Walt Disney Company buying more than half of the offsets. Other companies on Alto Mayo’s offset buyers list include mining giant BHP, Microsoft, United Airlines, and Gucci. In 2015, Pearl Jam bought offsets from Alto Mayo to offset emissions from its concert tours.

According to the most recent Verified Carbon Standard monitoring report for the project, since June 2008 the project has generated more than 7.4 million carbon credits.

Fortress Conservation: Disney's offsets

Fortress conservation and the rondas campesinas

Bloomberg’s journalists Zachary R. Mider and John Quigley travelled to the Alto Mayo forest and spoke to local communities living there. They found the community split between those in favour of the project, and those opposing it. Conservation International offers coffee seedlings and fertilizer to anyone who promised to stop clearing the forest. About half of the families living in the forest have joined Conservation International’s programme.

“Once-rampant deforestation has slowed,” Mider and Quigley write. But the REDD project has “inflamed a long-standing conflict between the government, which claims the land as a national park, and thousands of people who live there.”

Fortress Conservation: Disney's offsetsFidel Mendoza moved to Alto Mayo in 1977, when he was 15. He bought a plot of land informally. In 2001, more than 20 years after he arrived, he found out that the land belonged to the state. “You can’t be here,” a government official told him.

The forest became a protected area in 1987, but it wasn’t until the REDD project started in 2008, and Disney’s money started flowing the following year, that signs appeared stating that Alto Mayo is state property. Patrols by park rangers increased.

Villagers in Alto Mayo are organised in rondas campesinas – self-defense groups that control parts of the forest. In August 2016, about a dozen rangers were detained and beaten. In September 2016, about 200 ronderos held 31 policemen, prosecutors, and park rangers captive for 19 hours. The rangers were forced to walk barefoot for four hours and were beaten. The ronderos were accused of illegal logging and were threatened with being evicted out of the national park.

In 2018, the head of Conservation International’s Alto Mayo operation had to flee the area after receiving violent threats.

Mendoza and other ronderos that Bloomberg’s journalists met said they had nothing to do with “some of these acts”. But they said that using force was their lawful duty. They are the true stewards of the land, they said.

They argued that the government wants to evict settlers and use the forest for mining and oil concessions. But they had little evidence to back this up.

In 2018, Peru’s then-prime minister, César Villanueva Arévalo, travelled to Alto Mayo. He promised to restore the government’s authority in the area. Villanueva flew over the forest for 45 minutes and said that he had seen extensive areas of possibly illegal crops and the destruction of “vast areas of forests”. Since his visit, police helicopters now fly regularly over the forest from a nearby army base.

Fortress Conservation: Disney's offsets

In June 2019, ronderos blocked the highway with boulders for four days, after National Police attempted to evict 7,000 inhabitants of Aguas Verdes. Feliciano Burga, a local leader of the ronderos told La República that,

“The State wishes to evict us under the pretext of labelling us as terrorists, traffickers, loggers, criminals and squatters; but that is a lie. We are farmers and we are on the regional border, we are the exit and entry gate from the north and east, between the departments of San Martín and Amazonas, and thus they have forgotten us, leaving us without electricity, or drinking water.”

Burga said that since the National Police had come into the area, teachers had been ordered not to teach, affecting more than 300 primary and secondary children. Burga listed the protesters’ demands:

“We are not going to lift our protest until a high-level and decision-making commission arrives to solve the problem. First that the Police withdraw from the scene. Second, that the UGEL [Local Educational Management Unit from Rioja] send teachers back so that our children can study. And third, that our small town of Aguas Verdes is recognised, we are allowed to carry out our agricultural activities, and electricity is installed as well as drinking water and sewerage.”

The protests were dispersed by hundreds of riot police firing tear-gas, Bloomberg reports.

Fortress Conservation: Disney's offsets

In December 2019, the police set up a base in the Candamo sector of Alto Mayo, an area where deforestation is still taking place. Between 2001 and 2018 more than 2,000 hectares of forest was lost in the Candamo sector. The Minister of Environment, Fabiola Muñoz, the Minister of the Interior, Carlos Morán, and the head of Sernanp, Pedro Gamboa turned up at the opening of the base. About 100 armed policemen will patrol the forest from the base.

Conservation International: “These are complex areas”

Conservation International is keen to promote Alto Mayo as a success – for obvious reasons, given the amount of money it’s receiving from Disney and other polluting corporations. The ronderos who are still resisting the REDD project are a “disgruntled minority”, a Conservation International official told Bloomberg.

Claudio Scheider, from Conservation International in Lima, told Bloomberg that, “These are complex areas, you know? Most of the people are in favour of the project, and I think we have reached a critical mass.”

Mider and Quigley spoke to Norbil Becerra, who moved to Alto Mayo in the late 1990s. He grew coffee and raised cattle. Later he worked as a carpenter and illegal logger. Today, he runs a bird sanctuary with Conservation International’s help.

A few hundred bird watchers turn up each year. Becerra told Bloomberg, “Instead of chopping down and clearing the last of our forests, you can do this sort of work. And it’s a better way to live.”

Conservation International estimates that the rate of deforestation has been halved, and that 500,000 tons of CO2 emissions have been avoided.

The Mickey Mouse baseline

But Disney is relying on a fairy tale to give the impression that it is attempting to address climate change. Mider and Quigley write that,

Forest offsets have their detractors. Measuring a project’s true carbon impact is always a matter of guesswork. Sponsors must estimate how much deforestation would take place if they didn’t do anything to stop it. If their tree-saving work outperforms that baseline, the difference becomes a carbon credit. Real-world climate impact hinges on the accuracy of a made-up scenario.

In the case of Alto Mayo, Conservation International used a vastly inflated baseline in order to generate more carbon credits, as REDD-Monitor pointed out in 2013:

Fortress Conservation: Disney's offsets

Of course that generated more money for forest protection, but it also helped greenwash more of Disney’s “real-world climate impact”.

Mider and Quigley note that “Conservation International projected a rate of deforestation without intervention averaging about 5,000 acres a year over a decade—more than triple the already blistering pace set in the mid-2000s.”

Agustin Silvani, a Conservation International executive told Bloomberg, “We don’t develop the methodologies. We just follow them.”

As Larry Lohmann, writer and activist at The Corner House, points out, “the problem is not ‘bad baselines’ but the concept of counterfactual baselines itself.” It’s impossible to check what would have happened without the REDD project, for the simple reason that the REDD project went ahead.

Disney’s ever increasing emissions

The ronderos know that Disney is funding the management of the national park, but they have no idea why. “That’s what we want to find out – what Disney’s angle is,” Jose Gilmer Vasquez told Bloomberg.

Here’s how Dr Beth Stevens, Senior Vice President of Corporate Citizenship at Disney, explains “Disney’s angle” in a 2014 Conservation International promotional video:

Fortress Conservation: Disney's offsets“Disney has a long legacy of caring about nature. We want to get to zero net direct greenhouse gas emissions. The only way to get to zero carbon emissions is to have a really strong approach, where you say, ‘OK, first we have to reduce our use of fuels. Second, we have to look for what are the alternatives that are lower carbon, and then finally, when you’ve done all of those things, then you look to carbon offsets to get the rest of the way.’

We are very focussed on forest offsets, if we can slow deforestation then we are slowing the amount of carbon emissions that are going into the atmosphere.”

Disney buys about 850,000 carbon credits each year, according to the company’s 2019 Corporate Social Responsibility report. About half of them coming from Alto Mayo. As a result, millions of dollars have gone through Conservation International towards managing the national park.

Meanwhile, Disney’s greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase, partly as a result of Disney’s cruise ships.

Fortress Conservation: Disney's offsets

In addition to theme parks and films, since 1996 Disney’s business empire includes Disney Cruise Line which now owns four huge cruise ships: Disney Magic; Disney Wonder; Disney Dream; and Disney Fantasy.

Disney Dream was launched in 2011 and Disney Fantasy in 2012. Both weigh about 130,000 tons, are 340 metres long, and have 1,250 passenger cabins. Before these two ships were built, the two smaller cruise ships accounted for about half of Disney’s carbon dioxide emissions.

And Disney Cruise Line has big expansion plans with a new ship planned for completion in 2021, another in 2022, and yet another in 2023. The three new ships will be even bigger than the Dream and the Fantasy.

Because of the coronavirus, Disney’s emissions will be lower this year, meaning that fewer offsets will be needed from Alto Mayo. Disney’s ships are not sailing, and most of the theme parks are still closed. But that’s just a temporary blip, to be reversed as soon as possible. Disney World workers have set up a petition urging Disney to delay reopening its theme parks in Florida.

Mider and Quigley conclude that,

The black smoke that until recently rose from the stacks of the Disney Dream attests to the pollution pumped out in the name of ever-greater consumption. And the Alto Mayo has become part of the system that maintains that consumption, allowing the pollution to continue unabated even as graphs in Disney’s annual reports show net emissions moving steadily downward.

 


This post is part of a series of posts on REDD-Monitor looking at REDD and environmental injustice in the Andes Amazon. A Spanish translation of this post is available here.

 

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Facebook

1 thought on “Fortress conservation: Disney’s offsets are paying for heavily armed park rangers in Conservation International’s Alto Mayo REDD project in Peru”

  1. Chris Lang says:
    31 March 2022 at 11:38 am

    Here’s how Friends of the Earth US describes the environmental impacts of Disney Cruise Lines:

    Of the top cruise lines, Disney is open and transparent about their environmental impacts. Disney ships utilize fuel with a 0.1% sulfur content which is key to reducing climate-harming emissions. But Disney isn’t perfect. They like to provide their vacationers with a once-in-a-lifetime travel experience, including going to untouched areas of the planet and to create a “private island” experience. And however idyllic that sounds, there’s an environmental price to pay.

    Disney is working on a massive cruise ship port in the Bahamas at Lighthouse Point. This port is opposed by community groups and will cause harm to coral reefs and migratory patterns of marine wildlife. The Bahamian Island of Eleuthera is known for its clear blue waters, sandy beaches, lemon sharks, and sea turtles. It also includes four endemic plant species and over 200 bird species. But Disney’s planned Lighthouse Point port would bring a million visitors to this untouched region, adding noise, water, and air pollution to this habitat.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • shahid a on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Recent Posts

  • “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance letter to Pogio Ghate, Minister for Environment, Conservation and Climate Change
  • Ecomapuá Amazon REDD Project, Brazil: Pública investigation reveals Ecomapuá Conservação is selling “illegal” carbon offsets from land it does not own, without transferring the money to local communities
  • Response from Steve Zwick, Verra: “Verra will ask Kanaka Management Systems to cease and desist any actions that may mislead communities into thinking that Verra has not already rejected the project”

Recent Comments

  • shahid a on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!