Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor
Sengwer

“Sengwer and the Forests are one and inseparable.” Despite court ruling, Indigenous Sengwer communities vow to remain in Embobut Forest, Kenya

Posted on 19 June 202019 June 2020

By Chris Lang

The Sengwer Indigenous People live in the Embobut Forest in the western highlalnds of Kenya. For years they have faced threats and violent evictions. The Kenya Forest Service has carried out a series of evictions of the Sengwer, supposedly in the name of conservation. In January 2018 Kenya Forest Service guards shot and killed Robert Kirotich, an unarmed Sengwer man who was herding cattle in the Embobut Forest.

In March 2013, representatives of the Sengwer community filed a legal case seeking the degazettement of Embobut Forest.

In February 2020, the lawyer representing the Sengwer told the Environment and Land Court in Eldoret that the community was illegally evicted from the forest in 2013. Dudley Ochiel, a lawyer with the Katiba Institute told the court that,

“The Sengwer community had demonstrated that it is best placed to conserve the forest which is their ancestral land. The community has developed its conservation by-laws to prove that it will conserve the forest.”

The Kenya Forest Service argued that Embobut was gazetted as State Forest in 1954 and declared a Central Forest in 1964. According to the Kenya Forest Service, the land is therefore legally protected from human settlement.

The Sengwer filed another petition in 2018, arguing that they had suffered violent attacks, including the burning of houses and destruction of property at the hands of Kenya Forest Service guards.

Court upholds fortress conservation

On 13 May 2020, the Environment and Lands Court dismissed the suit by the Sengwer. Justice Stephen Kibunja ruled that,

“The proclamation and subsequent gazettement of Embobut Forest as a forest reserve and thereafter as a central forest protected by the State has not been disputed. The forest having been proclaimed a forest reserve and gazetted as a central forest in 1964, then it forms part of public land as defined by the Constitution.

“The court finds that the petitioners in both petitions have not tendered any evidence to show or suggest that the said land had been legally and procedurally degazetted as a protected forest or procedurally and legally alienated to them as the Sengwer community.”

The Kenyan newspaper The Standard reports that the Sengwer community “have vowed to continue with their quest”.

Apart from the obvious fact that this is the Sengwer’s home, there is an overwhelming body of evidence that shows that the best way of preserving the Embobut Forest would be to allow the Sengwer to live there and manage it.

Sengwer activist Elias Kimaiyo told Martin Crook a researcher at the University of London, “Sengwer and the Forests are one and inseparable.”

Kenya’s 2010 Constitution states that lands traditionally occupied by hunter gatherer communities are community property (Art. 63 (2) (d) (ii)). Kenya’s 2016 Community Land Act was written “to provide for the recognition, protection and registration of community land rights”.

The Kenya Forest Service is continuing a model of fortress conservation that has seen as many as 1,000 Sengwer homes burned down.

For the Sengwer, this is their home

As Forest Peoples Programme points out,

For the Sengwer, this is their home. Their very attachment to their lands here in Embobut forest and glades is why they remain, despite all the harassment and burning of their homes by Kenya Forest Service (KFS) over many years. Should that harassment be successful, it will leave their lands at the mercy of those who have no long-term care or commitment to their ancestral lands, and leave the Sengwer themselves destitute and deprived of their human rights.

Justin Kenrick, a senior policy advisor at Forest Peoples Programme, sums up the best way forward – a way that the Kenya Forest Service and its funders (which include the World Bank) have so far ignored:

Conservation science is clear that securing the collective land rights of such indigenous forest communities, communities who have cared for their lands for centuries, is the surest way of securing such forests and the flow of water from them to Kenya.

 


PHOTO Credit: Peter Ochieng, Standard.
 

1 thought on ““Sengwer and the Forests are one and inseparable.” Despite court ruling, Indigenous Sengwer communities vow to remain in Embobut Forest, Kenya”

  1. Kenneth Kipketer Kipkeiyo says:
    11 July 2020 at 6:56 am

    International world, kindly intervene the situation is worst after torching of houses in embobut.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!