Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Global Forestry Investments: Skeene and Bowers plead not guilty

Posted on 17 June 202017 June 2020

By Chris Lang

Andrew Skeene and Omari Bowers, former directors of Global Forestry Investments, last week pleaded not guilty to fraud charges. In 2019, following an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office, Skeene and Bowers were arrested and charged with three offences of conspiracy to defraud, four offences of forgery, one offence of misconduct in the course of winding up, and one offence of making a false statement not under oath.

On 11 June 2020, Skeene and Bowers appeared via telephone at a virtual hearing at the Central Criminal Court in London. Their trial is set for 6 April 2021, in Southwark Crown Court.

On its website, the Serious Fraud Office has the following announcement:

From 26 June to 7 October 2019, the GFI questionnaire experienced technical difficulties which means submissions made during that period were not received, even though you may have received a confirmation acknowledgement message thanking you for your submission. Therefore your questionnaire data was not stored or acted upon.

Anyone who sent in a questionnaire between these dates needs to resubmit the form via the Serious Fraud Office Secure Form:

Anyone who invested in Global Forestry Investments and has not yet completed the SFO questionnaire should also fill in the form.

Global Forestry Investments offered investments in plots of land in teak plantations in Brazil. REDD-Monitor first wrote about Global Forestry Investments in March 2014:

In February 2015, the Serious Fraud Office announced that it had opened an investigation into Global Forestry Investments:

In July 2019, the Serious Fraud Office announced that it had charged Skeene and Bowers. Skeene was arrested at Heathrwo Airport on 29 June 2019, Bowers was arrested at Gatwick Airport on 30 October 2019:

In February 2020, judge Philip Kramer in the High Court ordered Skeene and Bowers to continue with monthly payments under a settlement agreed in November 2018 totalling £8.6 million:

 

2 thoughts on “Global Forestry Investments: Skeene and Bowers plead not guilty”

  1. Michael Bowe says:
    1 June 2021 at 10:31 am

    Dear Chris, I was interested to know if you had heard whether this case against the fraudsters Skeene & Bowers went ahead at Southwark Crown Court back on April 6th 2021? I have previously had letters from the liquidators involved, but usually only hear once a year. I would imagine that Covid 19 is causing this case, as with so many others to be delayed endlessly.

  2. Chris Lang says:
    1 June 2021 at 1:12 pm

    @Michael Bowe – The current page on Serious Fraud Office website about Global Forestry Investments includes the following statement:

    A trial at Southwark Crown Court was set to commence on 19 April 2021. In April 2021, the trial was adjourned to commence on 21 February 2022.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!