By Chris Lang
This week’s REDD notes. For more links to news about forests, the climate crisis, natural climate solutions, the oil industry, greenwash, carbon offsetting, and so on, please follow @reddmonitor on Twitter.
Every six seconds: A football pitch of tropical primary rainforest gone
On 2 June 2020, Global Forest Watch released its data for tree cover loss in 2019. The tropics lost 11.9 million hectares of tree cover in 2019. The area of tree cover lost in tropical primary forests amounted to 3.8 million hectares. Primary forest loss was 2.8% higher in 2019 than in 2018.
Tropical primary forest loss has fallen from the record highs in 2016 and 2017, but the figure for 2019 is still the third highest since the year 2000.
The five countries that lost the most tropical primary forest in 2019 are: Brazil (1,361,000 hectares); Democratic Republic of Congo (574,000 hectares); Indonesia (324,000 hectares); Boliva (290,000 hectares); and Peru (162,000 hectares).
In total in 2019, according to Global Forest Watch, the world lost 24.2 million hectares of tree cover.
CO2 levels in the atmosphere reach record high
In May 2020, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels reached the highest monthly total every recorded. Scientists from Scripps Institute of Oceanography reported an average level in May of 417.2 parts per million. That’s 2.4 ppm higher than the May 2019 peak.
The reductions in emissions as a result of the coronavirus crisis have failed to make a difference. A post on the Scripps Institute of Oceanography website quotes geochemist Ralph Keeling as saying that,
“fossil fuel use would have to decline by about 10 percent around the world and would need to be sustained for a year to show up clearly in carbon dioxide levels, which are expressed as parts per million (ppm) of air. No events in the 62-year history of the Keeling Curve – including the global economic downturn of 2008 and the collapse of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s – have caused such a drop to date.”
Permian Global finds another big polluter to greenwash: Volkswagen
Last week, Volkswagen announced that it was partnering with REDD project developer Permian Global. VW’s press release states that, “Under the terms of the agreement, the two companies will initiatlly develop projects on a total area of one million hectares, ten times the size of Berlin, in South America and Asia.”
It’s a marriage made in hell.
Permian Global is an investment firm based in the tax haven of Luxembourg. Its most infamous project is the Katingan REDD project in Indonesia. An investigative report by Daphné Dupont-Nivet in Investico revealed that the project is threatened by land conflicts, fires, and an oil palm plantation.
The Katingan project sells carbon credits to oil giant Shell, and (since September 2019) to Volkswagen.
Volkswagen, of course, is the world’s largest car maker, infamous for “dieselgate”, under which VW sold millions of “clean diesel” cars, that turned out to be emitting up to 150 times as much pollution as a normal car.
Just days before George Floyd was murdered by a police officer in Minneapolis, setting off protests internationally in support of Black Lives Matter, VW apologised for and withdrew a racist advert on VW’s Instagram for the new Golf 8.
WWF puts out a racist video
On 5 June 2020, WWF put out a promotional video featuring David Attenborough. In it, Attenborough tells us that “Suddenly, saving our planet is within reach. We have a plan. We know what to do.”
Obviously, Attenborough doesn’t tell us who “We” are, or on whose authority “We” drew up the “plan”. He continues:
“Stop the damaging stuff, roll out the new green tech, stablise the human population as low as we fairly can, keep hold of the natural wealth we have currently got and we’ll have built a stable, healthy world that we can benefit from forever.”
The words “stablise the human population” were accompanied by footage of brown people:
As Survival International points out, “It’s racism, pure and simple.”
WWF removed the video and apologised. “Don’t hold your breath for a proper examination fo what they actually do though,” Survival commented. “Racism’s built into their whole model.”
Meanwhile, Tom Warren and Katie JM Baker’s investigation in BuzzFeed News of human rights abuses by WWF has been shortlisted for Private Eye’s Paul Foot Award 2020.
Why we can’t rely on carbon farming to address the climate crisis
“Corporations, politicians, and environmentalists have all embraced carbon farming as the feel-good climate solution of the moment.” That’s the opening sentence of an article by James Temple on MIT Technology Review. The article takes a detailed look at the soil carbon business and how it allows corporations to claim credit for carbon dioxide supposedly sucked out of the atmosphere – “without cutting emissions from their own operations”, as Temple points out.
The big problem? There is little evidence that carbon farming works as well as promised. Temple writes:
The world’s farmlands do have the capacity to store billions of tons of carbon dioxide in the soil annually, according to a National Academies report last year. But there is still uncertainty concerning which farming techniques work, and to what degree, across different soil types, depths, topographies, crop varieties, climate conditions, and time periods.
Deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon set to skyrocket
Deforestation has accelerated dramatically in Brazil under President Jair Bolsonaro. The coronavirus has accelerated the destruction. From January to April 2020, more than 120,000 hectares of Amazon tree cover has been cleared. That’s 55% more than the same period last year. Bulldozer sales more than doubled in the same period compared to last year.
An article in the New York Times looks at the damage the Bolsonaro regime is doing to Brazil’s forests, and how the coronavirus is making matters worse. Brazil has the highest daily number of coronavirus deaths in the world. More than 34,000 people have died so far of coronavirus in Brazil. (The figure stands at 35,930 on 8 June 2020.)
Far from addressing the problem, Bolsonaro is attempting to hide the data. Brazil’s government has now stopped publishing a running total of coronavirus deaths and infections.
And Environment Minister Ricardo Salles has said that he sees the media’s focus on the coronavirus as an opportunity to relax regulations on protecting the forest.
Mongabay recently visited Rondônia state to report on the illegal logging:
Brazil’s Indigenous Peoples fear for their forests as illegal loggers and miners move into their forests. Adriano Karipuna, an Indigenous leader in Rondônia state, told the New York Times that Indigenous communities fear that their health is at risk because of the ease with which illegal loggers and miners are destroying the forest:
““The dynamic can set in motion a genocide by spreading the coronavirus. The Brazilian government will be responsible.”
I don’t understand what is racist in the WWF’s video.
@Carlo Castellani – You’re kidding, right?
I’m not
@Carlo Castellani – Even WWF (sort of) understands what was racist in the video – even if it had to be pointed out to them. That’s why WWF withdrew the video.
The Corner House has a collection of briefings on overpopulation, collected here. I think this quotation from The Corner House’s website is a useful way of looking at overpopulation:
Here’s a short reading list highlighting the problems of the sort of statement that WWF made in its video about overpopulation:
Hiba Ahmad (2019) How racist myths built the population growth bogey-man, Global Justice Now.
Jedediah Purdy (2015) Environmentalism’s racist history, The New Yorker.
Larry Lohmann (2003) Re-Imagining the Population Debate, Corner House Briefing 38.
Ok Chris,
I’m not that interested in debating such an intricate issue. I try to keep things simple.
From the freedictionary.com, Racism is defined as:
“1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.”
Where does the video say that a race is superior to another, discriminate, or presents a prejudice?
I don’t believe WWF withdrew the video because they realized it was racist. An entity by default withdraws a commercial because it rises a negative reaction within its customers/supporters, even if only by a tiny fraction. Again on the principle to keep things simple. Making simple things more complicate makes me suspicious.
This is not to say that I disagree with your (and many others’) position. It’s just my lack of comprehension and/or interest in this specific issue. I always find your newsletter very interesting, with observations and point of views not conforming to the mainstream business-as-usual propaganda.
Thank you for your dedication and richness of references.
@Carlo Castellani – You might be interested in this:
Stephen Corry (2020) “The Big Green Lie”, CounterPunch, 26 June 2020.
Chris,
The article is an array of opinions. Some of them absolutely absurd as saying that the dominant species on this planet with a biomass that might be inferior to just that of the krill and an impact on the environment never before recorded is a “200-year old cry of “overpopulation” is ideological, fundamentally racist, certainly eugenic, and nothing to do with science.”. Again the term racism being used as a slogan. Which race is referred to? precise reference of it in the WWF statements?
The amount of misleading assertions doesn’t stop there. As saying that “The largest growth area is sub-Saharan Africa, where the population density remains extremely low and where they use very little of the world’s resources themselves”. Deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa is ramping up. Fires are emitting in the atmosphere as much carbon as from South America or Australia. And that wealth is not stolen from the North because the North eats Brazilian beef and fattens its pigs with soya-beans from Paraguay, not from Africa. A picture of night-lights; why not from wild-fires?
Ok, the author starts to offend those who don’t share his opinion. I’m not going on reading that kind of propaganda.
Anyway Chris, you failed to tell me where the WWF’s statement is racist. I consider the article you sent me a collection of inconsistent assertions, and this discussion a waste of time. I consider it close.
Ciao and stay well!
@Carlo Castellani – WWF’s video says we have to “stabilize the human population as low as we fairly can” and illustrates this with a picture of brown skinned people – implying that it is them that need to reduce their numbers.
As I’ve tried to explain, (and Stephen Corry does so too) there is a long history of discourse about overpopulation that is racist. When David Attenborough tells us that overpopulation is a problem, he never follows up by telling us that it is rich white men that we need fewer of. George Monbiot wrote a good piece a while back about rich white men banging on about overpopulation being the problem – while blind to the issue of overconsumption.
Even WWF could see the problem – once it was pointed out to them: