Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Coronavirus notes #5: FSC Australia’s shameful role in promoting logging as an “essential service”

Posted on 5 May 20205 May 2020
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

By Chris Lang

Australia suffered devastating fires between September 2019 and February 2020. About 7.4 million hectares of forest was burned, mainly in New South Wales and Victoria. The fires released 830 million tonnes of carbon dioxide – significantly more than the 530 million tonnes of CO2 that the country emits each year.

Environmentalists are now worried that logging of native forests is continuing during the Coronavirus lockdown when protests are impossible. Susie Russell, of the North East Forest Alliance, was part of a protest against logging in the Comboyne State Forest in New South Wales, before the lockdown started.

Last week, Russell told Al Jazeera that,

“The government is opening up areas that were burned, logging areas that were not, all sorts of approvals which are damaging to the environment are happening during this time. We feel angry and frustrated at not being able to get out there.

Environmental groups are calling for a halt to logging in native forests, at least until the ecological damage from the fires can be properly assessed and the information released to the public.

Predictably enough, the Forest Stewardship Council has taken the side of the logging industry – against the environmentalists and the forests.

In early April 2020, the West Australia Forest Alliance posted a letter on its Facebook page from Australia’s two forest certification schemes, Responsible Wood and FSC, to Australia’s prime minister, Scott Morrison. The letter urges Morrison to “identify the wood products industries as essential services”. The letter says nothing about the impact of the fires on the forests. It doesn’t even mention certification.

The West Australia Forest Alliance describes the letter as “a stunning new low for FSC”, and comments,

“If the letter wanted to point to certified plantations it could have. Instead it took a broad approach supporting logging of all forests, whether under certified conditions or not. FSC should be ashamed of themselves supporting all logging everywhere rather than focusing on their business which is encouraging certification.”

Dear Prime Minister,

This is clearly a uniquely challenging moment for our country as we face the unprecedented health, social and economic impact of COVID-19. You and the National Cabinet have the full support of Australia’s two forest certification schemes, Responsible Wood and the Forest Stewardship Council, in leading our proud nation through this crisis.

While we recognise and fully support the strong suite of measures introduced by the National Cabinet to curtail the spread of COVID-19, we urge you to identify the wood products industries as essential services in the nation’s response to the coronavirus pandemic should further restrictions be placed on Australia’s businesses.

The wood products industries supply a raft of critical products required to ensure the security and resilience of the nation’s critical infrastructure during the response to the pandemic. With products ranging from toilet paper and face masks to high-quality wood products to aid in the construction of potential emergency housing and healthcare facilities, the wood products industries are really the glue that holds the nation together.

The consequences of a perceived shortage of critical products has been abundantly clear recently in Australia’s supermarkets. We implore you to avoid further turmoil by exempting the forest product supply chain from future mitigation efforts.

Finally, shutting down the wood products industries will significantly delay the economic recovery in the wake of the crisis as many of the sectors that will drive the rebounding economy are reliant on Australian forest products.

With your support the nation’s wood products industries can continue its steady supply of critical products needed by the Australian public during and after this crisis.

Best wishes,

 


PHOTO Credit: Susie Russell via Al Jazeera.
 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“At our meeting, the former British prime minister, Tony Blair, asked a lot of questions on the REDD Plus program in Central Kalimantan, and on the challenges being faced by Central Kalimantan in implementing the program. I told him that so far we have not met any obstacle in implementing the REDD Plus program, including in communication.”

— Agustin Teras Narang Governor of Central Kalimantan, October 2011

Recent Posts

  • Carbonballs: Nigel Farage, carbon offset lobbyist
  • Kevin Conrad signs REDD deal with Papua New Guinea
  • Court of Appeal upholds conviction of Paul Moore, Michael Moore, and Haydon Driscoll, the men behind the Burbank of London carbon credit investment scam
  • Court of Appeal upholds conviction of carbon conman Sami Raja. In his 2019 trial, Raja’s legal representatives withdrew because “they were professionally embarrassed”
  • Court of Appeal upholds conviction of Dylan Creaven and Andrew Rowe, the men behind the Agon Energy carbon credit investment scam

Recent Comments

  • Sander van den Ende on Kevin Conrad signs REDD deal with Papua New Guinea
  • Eyedeal on “Returns up to 895%” and other misleading statements from Property Frontiers about investments in EcoPlanet Bamboo and Silva Tree
  • Chris Lang on Carbonballs: Nigel Farage, carbon offset lobbyist
  • Steve Zwick on Carbonballs: Nigel Farage, carbon offset lobbyist
  • Tom Rayner on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!