Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor
Amazon fires

Deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon this year reached the highest rate since 2008

Posted on 20 November 201929 November 2022

By Chris Lang

Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon rainforest increased this year to its highest rate since 2008, according to data released this week by Brazil’s National Space Research Institute (INPE). The data reveal that Amazon deforestation rose by 30% compared to last year.

In the period from August 2018 to July 2019, 9,762 square kilometres of forest was lost in Brazil’s Amazon. In 2008, an area of 12,911 km2 was lost.

The danger is that at some point, the Amazon will reach a tipping point at which it will no longer produce enough rainfall to sustain itself. In February 2018, in the journal Science Advances Thomas Lovejoy and Carlos Nobre wrote that,

“We believe that negative synergies between deforestation, climate change, and widespread use of fire indicate a tipping point for the Amazon system to flip to non-forest ecosystems in eastern, southern and central Amazonia at 20-25% deforestation.”

The area of the Amazon lost to deforestation reached more than 17% in 2018. Lovejoy and Nobre note that the severe droughts in 2005, 2010, and 2015-2016 could be “the first flickers of this ecological flicking point”.

They add that, “there is no point in discovering the precise tipping point by tipping it”.

How the government tried to play down the jump in deforestation

The deforestation figures were announced at INPE on 18 November 2019. Ricardo Salles, Brazil’s environment minister announced the deforestation figures in front of a graph of deforestation going back to 1988:

Compared to the area deforested in 1995 (29,059 km2) or 2004 (27,772 km2) the current rate of deforestation is low. But deforestation has more than doubled since 2012.

O Globo reports that Salles blames the increase in deforestation on illegal economic activities:

“The reason for the increase is known from 2012 onwards: the pressure of economic activities, mostly illegal. We need strategies to contain this.”

That’s disingenuous of Salles. He knows that since Brazil’s far right president Jair Bolsonaro took office in January 2019, the Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA), which is overseen by the environment ministry, has seen a 25% cut in its budget.

IBAMA has issued fewer fines for deforestation this year, despite the increase in the rate of deforestation.

In a statement, Cristiane Mazzetti of Greenpeace’s Amazon campaign comments that,

“We are reaping what the government has planted since the election campaign. Bolsonaro’s anti-environmental project has scrapped the ability to combat deforestation, favours those who practice environmental crime and encourages violence against forest peoples. Your government is trashing practically all the work it has done in recent decades to protect the environment.”

In August 2019, the head of INPE, Ricardo Galvão, was sacked after INPE reported that the deforestation rate in June had shot up by 88%. Bolsonaro accused INPE of making up the figures to make him look bad.

Five days after he was sacked, Galvão told the Guardian that,

“What is happening is that this government has sent a clear message that there will not be any more punishment [for environmental crimes] like before … This government is sending a very clear message that the control of deforestation will not be like it was in the past …. And when the loggers hear this message that they will no longer be supervised as they were in the past, they penetrate [the rainforest].”

And just in case you’re wondering whether REDD might be the answer to Brazil’s deforestation:

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Bobby on Living Investments UK and Hyperion Management are boiler room scams that offered investments in teak plantations in Costa Rica. But will the UK authorities take any action?

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Bobby on Living Investments UK and Hyperion Management are boiler room scams that offered investments in teak plantations in Costa Rica. But will the UK authorities take any action?

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP19 Warsaw COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Green Resources Guest post HBS Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union Finland France Gabon Germany Guyana India Indonesia Kenya Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2026 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!