Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

A new threat to the Maasai in Ngorongoro District of Tanzania

Posted on 11 October 20194 May 2021

By Chris Lang

Over the past decade, Indigenous Maasai communities living in Ngorongoro District in Tanzania have faced a series of violent evictions. The government recently announced that more evictions are planned, under a proposal to divide the Ngorongoro Conservation Area into four zones.

In March 2018, the Oakland Institute published a report documenting how, over the past decade, hundreds of Maasai homes have been burned and tens of thousands of people evicted from their land.

These violent evictions are all in the name of conservation, elite tourism, and big game hunting.

90,000 livelihoods threatened

In a press release released this week about the government’s latest plans, the Oakland Institute writes:

The Management and Resettlement plan, scheduled to unfold over the next seven years, is the latest chapter in the country’s history stained with forced evictions of the Maasai from their ancestral lands – crucial to their very survival. The new plan threatens approximately 90,000 livelihoods with the creation of new restricted areas within the NCA, where the Maasai are denied access for housing, livestock grazing, and crop cultivation.

In March 2019, a joint monitoring mission was carried out by the UNESCO World Heritage Centre, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area.

The mission report noted “looming threats”, such as the

impact of developments (in particular road upgrade project, tourism developments, carrying capacity issues, invasive alien species (IAS), poaching, rampant migratory patterns of the local communities resulting in new developments (some with modern architecture)…

The mission team a series of recommendations for the Tanzanian government, including to “complete the Multiple Land Use Model review exercise and share the results with World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies to advise on the most appropriate land use model, including in the matter of settling local communities in protected areas”.

In response, the Oakland Institute notes, “the Tanzanian government produced the Four Zone Management and Resettlement Plan”.

The proposed Four Zone Management and Resettlement Plan

The proposed Four Zone Management and Resettlement Plan will create four zones: a conservation core zone; a conservation sub-zone; a settlement and development zone; and a transition zone.

The area of the Ngorongoro Conservation Area would be increased from 8,100 square kilometres to 12,083 square kilometres. This increase would be achieved by incorporating the Loliondo and Lake Natron Game Controlled Areas into the Ngorongoro Conservation Area.

With this increased conservation area, the land available to the Maasai would be significantly reduced. The Maasai already face severe food insecurity as a result of existing restrictions on their livelihoods.

Under the new plan the Maasai would only be allowed to build homes on 18% of the total area of the conservation area – in the settlement and development zone. A Maasai elder told the Oakland Institute that,

“The land cited for development despite its size, does not have a single water stream and is not suitable for pastoralism. If this plan is to prevail, cows will perish in the NCA before 2038 and it will mark the end of the Maasai community in the famous world heritage site.”

A recent article in the RAI Newspaper quoted Freddy Manongi, the Chief Conservator of Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority is as saying that,

“There is a need to redistribute land as part of a strategy to overcome these challenges, and even if these communities are to be evacuated for a small compensation, our country is still large. There is enough land outside the reserve…

“I know it will not be an easy task, the noise will be great, but we will educate the public and especially the Indigenous communities of this Ngorongoro Valley region to know the benefits and that benefits of conservation are for all Tanzanians. I believe they will understand.”

Clearly, Manongi is not familiar with the concept of free, prior and informed consent.

The egregious role of UNESCO

The Oakland Institute describes UNESCO’s role in this latest threat to the Maasai as “egregious”. The UNESCO Commission called for the multiple land use model to be abandoned and recommended the removal of all people to create a Nature Reserve. The Maasai’s Bomas (thorn bush livestock including small huts for the Maasai) would be kept for “cultural tourism”.

UNESCO notes that, “relocation of Maasai will not be a new event in Tanzania”, as if that somehow makes future evictions more acceptable.

The Oakland Institute comments that,

This position from a UN agency whose mandate is “building peace in the minds of men and women,” demonstrates not only its blatant disregard for the historical wrongs inflicted upon the Maasai, but also for the internationally recognized rights of Indigenous Peoples.

A Maasai leader compares UNESCO and the government’s proposals with the injustices the Maasai faced under colonialism:

“UNESCO and the government of Tanzania’s plan is detrimental not only to the Maasai but also for the conservation of wildlife. Dividing the ecosystem doesn’t provide a long-term solution. It is a repeat of the myopic actions of the British colonial government, and our challenges have continued.”

The Oakland Institute argues that the proposal for creating four zones in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area “must be stopped” and “The colonization of Indigenous land in the name of conservation must end.”

 


PHOTO credit: Entrance to a new boma built by the displaced Maasai, the Oakland Institute.

 

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Facebook

3 thoughts on “A new threat to the Maasai in Ngorongoro District of Tanzania”

  1. Mike Jurvélius says:
    11 October 2019 at 7:37 pm

    The ecology in the area has been maintained by the indigenous people for thousands of years. Different use of wildfire will destroy the woodlands.

  2. Dancan says:
    13 October 2019 at 2:15 pm

    Hongera

  3. Kelvin Ayo says:
    23 April 2022 at 1:17 pm

    It’s real hard to explain but been forced to go out of your natural habitat its pain experience which Maasai face at Ngorongoro District Tanzania. It is also sad that the government of Tanzania values most its interest and forget the welfare of innocent people( maasai) in ngorongoro. ” people’s welfare matters more”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Kathleen McCroskey on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid a on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Recent Posts

  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance demands proper REDD safeguards and implementation of moratorium on voluntary carbon market REDD projects
  • “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance letter to Pogio Ghate, Minister for Environment, Conservation and Climate Change
  • Ecomapuá Amazon REDD Project, Brazil: Pública investigation reveals Ecomapuá Conservação is selling “illegal” carbon offsets from land it does not own, without transferring the money to local communities

Recent Comments

  • Kathleen McCroskey on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid a on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!