Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

The failure of the UN Climate Action Summit. Helped by the distraction of Natural Climate Solutions

Posted on 26 September 201924 October 2019

This week saw the UN Climate Action Summit in New York. The highlight was Greta Thunberg’s “How dare you?” speech. She pointed out that the remaining CO2 budget will be gone in less than nine years at today’s emissions levels. “There will not be any solutions or plans presented in line with these figures here today,” she predicted.

Needless to say, she was right. While she was speaking, the UN Secreatry-General António Guterres was also on the stage. He clapped when she finished speaking.

Yet in his speech at the end of the summit, by which time it was obvious that nothing meaningful had happened during the summit, Guterres said,

“Dear friends, in planning this summit, I had one overriding objective. This was to be a summit of action plans not platitudes. I thank you for delivering.”

He listed the “action plans” starting with 77 countries that committed to net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. And 70 countries that announced that they will “boost” their Nationally Determined Contributions by 2020.

Obviously, none of the “action plans” involved leaving any fossil fuel in the ground. Addressing the fossil fuel industry’s contribution to climate breakdown isn’t on the UN’s climate agenda.

Guterres addresses oil and gas CEOs as “Dear friends and colleagues”

The day before the Climate Action Summit, Guterres was invited to take part in the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative dinner. On her website “Heated”, Emily Atkin writes that Guterres sent along his Special Advisor, Robert Orr, with a message for Orr to read out at the dinner.

Members of the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative include some of the most polluting companies on the planet:

But instead of telling the CEOs of these companies that they are going to have to leave fossil fuels in the ground if we are to stand a chance of addressing the climate crisis, he welcomed the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative’s greenwash.

Atkin posted Guterres’ message to the oil CEOs on her website:

Dear friends and colleagues, we are facing a climate emergency. Science and current events show that climate change is driving and exacerbating crises affecting all economies and all citizens across the world. This is not something humanity can and should accept. This is not something government leaders or economic leaders like you should accept. This is not something that I will not accept.

Global challenges require global solutions, and I welcome the collective power OGCI has been building since its launch 5 years ago. The platform has catalyzed concrete actions, including a delivery of a methane intensity target last year, as well as your support to the U.N.-led global methane alliance.

But our best efforts today are not enough. We are taking action, but not at the scale and speed that meets the urgency of the situation. Everyone, in every sector, must do more.

Your industry has the assets and the expertise to demonstrate the ambition we need and to lead the way. The world needs, and is demanding, an ambitious road map to reduce the carbon intensity of your industry, and to demonstrate your commitment to align with the goals of the Paris agreement.

This is the ask I have made of everyone. And I hope and expect that you can deliver ambitious and meaningful targets, including as soon as COP25 in Chile, to meet net zero emissions in the coming 30 years.

Sure enough, the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative made no promises at the Climate Action Summit to do anything that might affect its member companies to continue profiting from pollution. Instead, they promised to invest in carbon capture, use and storage, a 2025 carbon intensity target, and support to carbon pricing

And of course they promised to contribute to nature based solutions.

In a statement about the Climate Action Summit, the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative wrote,

Nature Based Solutions are crucial to achieving net zero emissions, in tandem with CCUS. OGCI has joined the Natural Climate Solutions Vision initiative, convened by the World Economic Forum and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

More than 150 nature-based solutions

In his closing speech at the UN Climate Action Summit, Guterres told an almost empty room that, “more than 150 nature-based solutions to cut carbon emissions were announced” at the summit.

The UN Environment Programme has set up a Nature Based Solutions contributions platform on its website. There are currently 195 contributions listed.

Before the UN Climate Action Summit, UNEP helped develop a “Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Manifesto” which states that “Nature-Based Solutions are a fundamental part of action for climate and biodiversity”.

The manifesto refers to the study that estimates that “one-third of the cost-effective climate mitigation needed between now and 2030 to stabilize warming to below 2°C”. It even describes it as “authoritative research”, despite the fact that the study is based on completely unrealistic assumptions.

No prizes for guessing that the manifesto makes no mention of the need to leave fossil fuels in the ground.

Thunberg and Monbiot promote natural climate solutions. With help from Conservation International

Last week, Greta Thunberg and George Monbiot put out a video promoting natural climate solutions. The video does mention fossil fuels.

Thunberg says, “To survive we need to stop burning fossil fuels, but this alone will not be enough.” And Monbiot says, “These natural climate solutions could make a massive difference, but only if we also leave fossil fuels in the ground.”

But the video does not mention of carbon offsets. Neither does the video attempt to deal with the fact that the oil industry loves natural climate solutions.

The video was funded in part by Conservation International, and with guidance from Nature4Climate. Monbiot’s Natural Climate Solutions initiative lists Conservation International and Nature4Climate as “allies”.

Both of these organisations are in favour of carbon offsets. Conservation International runs several REDD projects, selling carbon credits to anyone who will buy them.

Nature4Climate is an initiative of the United Nations Development Programme, with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and four US-based NGOs: Conservation International, The Nature Conservancy, Woods Hole Research Center, and World Resources Institute. UNDP is one of the organisations behind the UN-REDD programme, that exists to generate carbon credits from REDD. All of the organisations in Nature4Climate are carbon offset proponents.

In its press statement about the video, Conservation International explains how the film team used public transport to travel to Sweden, and electric vehicles in the UK, before adding, “The remaining carbon footprint was offset through NCS investments.”
 


PHOTO Credit: Screenshot from António Guterres‘ closing speech at the UN Climate Action Summit.
 

2 thoughts on “The failure of the UN Climate Action Summit. Helped by the distraction of Natural Climate Solutions”

  1. Catherine halvey goodwin says:
    26 September 2019 at 11:55 pm

    Could George Monbiot and Greta Thunberg please reply to this post? Carbon credit distractions have taken more than a decade away from focused attention on the major challenge before all of us: face our responsibilities before increased global warming. No more time for delay tactics that are favored by “financing” type bartering as the only response these critical times need.

  2. Chris Lang says:
    22 October 2019 at 10:08 pm

    @Catherine halvey goodwin – I would love George Monbiot to respond to this post. I sent him an email when he launched his Natural Climate Solutions website – to let him know that I’d written a critical post about it. I invited him to respond. I received a standard reply saying that,

    “I receive around 200 [emails] a day, so while I read all of them, trying to reply is overwhelming. So I’m very sorry to say that we have now decided to answer only a minority.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Bobby on Living Investments UK and Hyperion Management are boiler room scams that offered investments in teak plantations in Costa Rica. But will the UK authorities take any action?

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Bobby on Living Investments UK and Hyperion Management are boiler room scams that offered investments in teak plantations in Costa Rica. But will the UK authorities take any action?

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP19 Warsaw COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Green Resources Guest post HBS Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union Finland France Gabon Germany Guyana India Indonesia Kenya Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2026 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!