Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

REDD in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Civil society letter requests Free, Prior and Informed Consent, review of REDD+ approval decree, a complaints mechanism, and transparent distribution of funds

Posted on 21 June 20191 July 2019

In May 2019, the Congolese NGO Action pour la promotion et protection des peoples et espèces menacés (APEM) wrote to the coordinator of the World Bank’s Forest Investment Programme in the Democratic Republic. The letter followed a civil society monitoring mission of three REDD projects in Mai Ndombe province that was carried out in September and October 2018.

The monitoring mission found that the REDD projects are not operating with the safeguards that are supposedly in place to protect local communities’ and indigenous peoples’ rights. Communities are often unaware of what REDD is, and in many cases have not given their consent to REDD projects on their land.

This should not come as a surprise. In March 2012, staff from Forest Peoples Programme (FPP) and Cercle pour la defense de l’environnement (CEDEN) travelled to Mai Ndombe to find out more about what is now the Wildlife Works Carbon REDD project.

FPP and CEDEN found that, “none of the communities had been informed about what the carbon market actually is, or how it works”. Communities were not told what the impacts of the project might be on their livelihoods. At least one community refused to collaborate with the REDD project.

Six years after FPP and CEDEN visited Mai Ndombe, communities remain largely unaware of what REDD is. You can read about the 2018 report resulting from the monitoring mission here.

Here’s a rough translation of the declaration attached to APEM’s letter, summarising the findings of the monitoring report, and with a list of six recommendations:

Declaration of Environmental Civil Society on the REDD+ Process in Mai Ndombe addressed to the FIP and FCPF

We, actors of the environmental civil society gathered at the initiative of the NGO Action pour la promotion et protection des peoples et espèces menacés (APEM) working to monitor the rights of local communities and indigenous peoples living in and around the area of the REDD+ jurisdictional program Mai Ndombe.

After various field missions to the PIREDD Plateau implemented by WWF and the WWC concession in Mai-Ndombe we found:

  • Communities have not been sufficiently informed about REDD+;
  • REDD+ managers did not obtain free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) from communities prior to the establishment of the programme;
  • The selective participation of community representatives in Local Development Committees (CLDs), at the Steering Committee (COPIL), without community legitimacy;
  • Failure to take customary land rights into account, preventing communities from claiming their rights to carbon;
  • Failure to respect the commitments made in the framework of the various signed protocols between the project promoters and the communities concerned;
  • Misappropriation of funds for REDD+ activities on the ground that prevents equitable sharing of benefits.

In light of the above, we ask for the following:

  1. Ensure that each community involved in the process is fully informed and sensitised about the REDD+ process;
  2. To document the FPIC obtained from the communities in accordance with the methodology established by Decree no. 026 of 8 November 2017;
  3. Restructure the Local Development Committees in a participatory way and strengthen their capacities so that they fully play their role in representing the communities;
  4. Support the review of the REDD+ approval decree for a new decree to: i) mandate the REDD+ process to take into account the customary land rights of local communities and indigenous peoples; and ii) allow the communities to be the leaders of REDD+ projects and thus to have direct access to carbon payments;
  5. Make a complaint and appeal mechanism operational in each project and sensitise communities on its functioning and referral;
  6. Demand that REDD+ funds be distributed transparently, equitably, and arrive in the field (villages) through actions that deliver tangible benefits (excluding carbon benefits) to local communities and indigenous peoples; especially through community forestry.

Kinshasa, May 21, 2019

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!