Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Indigenous Environmental Network: Sky Protectors’ Win against California’s Carbon Colonialism

Posted on 22 November 2018
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Indigenous Environmental Network has put out a press release celebrating California’s postponement of a decision on its Tropical Forest Standard until April 2019. It’s “a significant win” Indigenous Environmental Network says in the press release.

IEN’s press release is posted below, and here is Tom Goldtooth, IEN’s executive director, speaking at the California Air Resources Board public meeting on 16 November 2018:

“Madam chair, Mary Nichols, board members of the California Air Resources Board, and to the indigenous spirits of these territories that are still active. My name is Tom Goldtooth, executive director of the Indigenous Environmental Network, formed in 1990.

“Since 1998, I have been involved in climate change mitigation and adaptation policy isuues from an indigenous perspective and in close consultation with grassroots indigenous peoples from tropical forested regions and of the North, including the Arctic region.

“Our network has reviewed the proposed Tropical Forest Standard. As my time is limited, I will be brief on a couple of key points.

“If the Tropical Forest Standard is approved, it would outsource California’s responsibility for human rights abuses, and threats to the cultural survival of indigenous peoples. It would become a model for expanding the market and implementation of carbon offset projects in countries, not just at the subnational jurisdictional level, but will become a door opener at the national and international levels.

“I come from a long history of the environmental justice movement. One issue we have always fought for is the right of communities impacted by governmental decisions and policies, whether they are guidance documents, standards, or regulatory policies, to be consulted on the principles of free, prior and informed consent. There has been no meaningful participation and no adequate consultation of indigenous peoples and forest dependent communities on the impact of this proposed Tropical Forest Standard. Carbon forest offset contracts, such as these REDD pilot projects are already resulting in land grabs, harassment, threats of violence, and evictions of forest dependent communities in the global South.

“There are many cases already where forest offset projects in developing countries are violating the human rights and rights of indigenous peoples.

“There is still debate globally on carbon accounting and on a mechanism for monitoring, reporting and verification on offsets and carbon trading. There is over 100% margin of error for measuring forest carbon sequestration, according to the UN panel, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. There is over 100% of being wrong.

“Our network of indigenous peoples from the South and North are asking CARB to reject the Tropical Forest Standard.

“Board members: Our air is not for sale. Mother Earth and Father Sky is not for trade. We as indigenous peoples have real solutions Keep fossil fuels in the ground. Thank you.”

 

INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK

Defenders on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples – for Environmental, and Climate Justice – Just Transition – and – the Territorial Integrity of Mother Earth and Father Sky

Press Release

Sky Protectors’ Win against California’s Carbon Colonialism

November 19, 2018 (Sacramento) – Indigenous Environmental Network’s International Sky Protectors Delegation and a broad coalition of local California tribal members, environmental justice groups, fenceline communities, people of color, academics and NGOs celebrated a significant win Friday, November 16th against California’s cap and trade carbon market program.

In a marathon hearing of the California Air Resources Board, Sky Protectors’ eloquent testimonies played a significant role towards blocking the vote on the so-called Tropical Forest Standard until April 2019. Blocking the adoption of the Tropical Forest Standard, temporarily protects world’s tropical forests and their guardians from a false solution to climate change called forest carbon offsets. The Sky Protectors also temporarily stalled momentum for the airlines industry, the United Nations and carbon markets all over the world to use such forest offsets, which often are generated by evicting Indigenous Peoples and local communities from their land and territories.

The Sky Protectors delegation’s representative from Africa, Dr. Asume Isaac Isuoka, Director of Social Action, Nigeria denounced that “California’s Tropical Forest Standard is colonialism pure and simple. In Nigeria, carbon offset projects have resulted in the militarization of forests in Cross River State. Communities are prohibited from entering the forest to gather food. The resulting despair and hunger, drives people to migrate. Carbon offsets are a driver of immigration. Furthermore, carbon offset regimes like the TFS are a sham that do not reduce greenhouse gas emissions at source.”

According to Tom BK Goldtooth, Executive Director of Indigenous Environmental Network, “the Tropical Forest Standard constitutes a crucial piece of the California’s proposed international carbon offsets scheme, which is already fueling massive land grabs of Indigenous Peoples territories and human rights violations. The Tropical Forest Standard is a cynical attempt to outsource California’s responsibility for such abuses to governments of the Global South and lets big polluters like Chevron oil refinery to buy cheap permits to pollute. The so-called Tropical Forest Standard (TFS) really stands for Trading the Future of the Sky. It privatizes the Sky and the air that we breathe.”

As historical epic wildfires in California created devastation and death, Sky Protectors wearing respiratory masks were forced to move their pre-hearing prayer circle and press conference inside. Sky Protectors were quick to point out the irony of holding the California Air Resources Board hearing on a day when the sun was hidden by thick smoke and it was impossible to breathe clean air.

Removing his mask, Sky Protector Marlon Santi Gualinga of the Kichwa People of Sarayaku in the Ecuadorian Amazon and a national leader of the Pachakutik movement explained, “We are defenders of the forest and the sky. We will not allow the sky to become a business venture. If California want to save the planet, California has to stop being hypocrites. California has to reduce carbon emissions at source and keep oil in the ground!”

According to Ana Luz Valadez Ortega, the delegation’s expert on carbon offsets in Chiapas, Mexico and a researcher with the Centro for Change in Rural Mexico (CECCAM), “we completely reject REDD+ (another name for forest offsets) because it flagrantly violates indigenous Peoples’ rights to self-determination, self-government and livelihood, which includes native knowledge systems required to care for forests. REDD+ greenwashes extractive industries’ destruction like oil drilling, fracking and monoculture plantations and allows pollution and deforestation to continue. REDD+ also violates the sovereignty of all of the people of Mexico who have not been informed, consulted nor granted their consent.”

Chief Ninawa Huni Kui, President of the Huni Kui People’s Federation of the Brazilian Amazon, State of Acre, Brazil, denounced that “California’s forest offsets are part of ‘green’ capitalism, which privatizes life and violates human rights. Offsets are a huge lie from start to finish. If Californian politicians want to paint themselves as saviors of the climate, they must not promote false solutions to climate change like the Tropical Forest Standard that threatens Indigenous Peoples’ survival. We defend the Sacred. We defend Mother Earth. The Sky is not for sale!”


For more information, check out:

ienearth.org

skyprotector.org

no-redd.com

 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“There is nothing that can be agreed in 2015 that would be consistent with the 2 degrees. The only way that a 2015 agreement can achieve a 2-degree goal is to shut down the whole global economy.”

— Yvo de Boer, special adviser on climate change to KPMG LLP, November 2013

Recent Posts

  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Some questions for Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of Plant-for-the-Planet

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Chris Lang on Why has the Financial Conduct Authority not taken down the website of the clone scam “Good Investment Advisors”?

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!