Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Response from Iman Sapari, Yayorin, to “Slippery violence” paper about Sungai Lamandau REDD+ Project, Indonesia

Posted on 5 June 2018

On 30 May 2018, REDD-Monitor wrote a post based on a paper in the current issue of the journal Conservation and Society. The paper is titled, “Slippery Violence in the REDD+ Forests of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia”, and is written by Peter Howson.

Earlier today, REDD-Monitor received a response from Iman Sapari, director of Yayorin (Yayasan Orangutan Indonesia), a local Indonesian NGO works in the area of the Sungai Lamandau wildlife reserve. Yayorin carried out the community development work during the REDD+ feasibility study.

Yayorin’s response is posted here in full and unedited.

Response from Yayorin to Peter Howson’s article:

There are several issues in this article which we think are not appropriate. First, the REDD+ feasibility project in the buffer zone of the Lamandau Wildlife Reserve was designed and implemented with great care and precisely to provide access to local/marginalised communities such as ex illegal loggers, hunters and communities that were economically dependent on the forest area around the Lamandau WR.

The first step was to conduct a feasibility study to answer the question whether a REDD+ project was feasible? And if feasible, what interventions should be done; who should be project’s targets and by what mechanism?

Based on the results of this study, if a carbon project were to be implemented in the buffer zone of the Lamandau WR, it should involve the community around the reserve through the Community Forest (Hutan Kemasyarakatan/HKm) model, where people are granted a legal management right for 35 years and can harvest non-timber forest products (HHBK), limited potential for planted timber and other activities in accordance with the permit given.

The project implementation consortium (Yayorin, ICRAF, Clinton Foundation, Rare and Orangutan Foundation), also realizes that a REDD Program is only an additional bonus or incentive from the project and is not the main objective, therefore the project implemented in the Lamandau buffer zone area prioritized the strengthening of local/marginal people, both ex illegal loggers, hunters and communities economically dependent on forest areas around the reserve, through a series of incentives for local economic development including fish-pond cultivation, floating cages as well as fish/shrimp processing, red palm sugar and broomsticks from nipah palms.

Currently, activities undertaken by the pilot project have already provided economic benefits to local and marginalized communities even though the anticipated REDD project has not materialised, therefore we think that Howson has not gathered sufficient information, so that his conclusions regarding the REDD programme in the Lamandau buffer area are not appropriate.

Related to the restriction on communities carrying out economic activities in the Lamandau Wildlife Reserve, it must be realized that through granting limited permits, this has allowed access to surrounding communities. Since Indonesian regulations normally prohibit economic activities in wildlife reserves, this demonstrates that the management authority has been very accommodating to the needs of marginal communities around the Lamandau Reserve.

Iman Sapari

 

2 thoughts on “Response from Iman Sapari, Yayorin, to “Slippery violence” paper about Sungai Lamandau REDD+ Project, Indonesia”

  1. Pete Howson (@PeterJHowson) says:
    5 June 2018 at 11:27 pm

    Appreciate the response. The ‘slippery violence’ I refer to is of a structural nature. The paper attempts to show how the logic of REDD+, as a global market mechanism, constructs community groups as violent and destructive and therefore in need of incentivising to do otherwise. The broad idea is that local people are compensated for the ‘opportunity costs’ of not degrading forests. In doing so the REDD+ mechanism wrongly points the blame at small-holders, rather than large international corporations, as the cause of forest degradation in Indonesia.

    The conceptualisation of exclusion I use, does not take exclusion as something simply negative, counter posed with the positive idea of ‘inclusion’, but rather as something inevitable within community-based constructions of REDD+. I’m aware that there were multiple economic and other benefits being enjoyed by the community groups. I have written another paper about those (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/apv.12089).

    Linking community-based conservation with international markets for carbon I think comes with many pitfalls. HKm and other options might prove more worthwhile, as I have said elsewhere (http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/08/15/over-redd-rainbow.html).

  2. [email protected] says:
    19 July 2018 at 8:12 am

    It is known that these efforts have become part of the Ministry of National Development Planning / Bappenas program with other ministries such as the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Ministry of Marine Affairs of Fisheries, the Ministry of Rural Affairs, the Ministry of Public Works and the Ministry of Energy and Mining through the Indonesia Climate Change Trust Fund (ICCTF). Yayorin packed it into an act of sustainability over the previous project as our commitment.
    Eddy-Director Yayorin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!