Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Norway’s Office of the Auditor General investigation into Norway’s rainforest billions: “Progress and results delayed, uncertain feasibility and effect, risk of fraud not well managed”

Posted on 18 May 2018
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Over the past ten years, Norway has handed out almost US$3 billion (NOK 23.5 billion) on stopping tropical deforestation. On 15 May 2018, the Office of the Auditor General completed its investigation into Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative. The report is critical.

A press statement on the Office of the Auditor General’s website highlights the key findings:

“The Office of the Auditor General’s investigation shows that progress and results are delayed, that current measures have uncertain feasibility and effect, and that the risk of fraud is not well-managed.”

Per-Kristian Foss, National Auditor, comments that, “There is a need to ensure better control of the use and results of these funds.”

Foss adds that,

“International efforts to preserve tropical forest have not found solutions to address these global challenges. There is therefore uncertainty about further implementation and whether the measures give lasting effect.”

The press statement continues:

The Office of the Auditor General refers to cases where the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Climate and Environment have not prevented and followed up the risk of financial fraud. This includes inadequate partner assessments prior to entering into an agreement and a lack of response when collaborative partners have been investigated for possible financial fraud. The administration has not complied with its own guidelines and has taken unnecessary risk of loss and abuse of Norwegian funds.

This is an important report, not just for Norway, but internationally. Norway is by far the largest REDD donor, and the findings are relevant for the international attempt to implement REDD.

Currently the report is only available in Norwegian (the following is based on a Google translate of a summary on the Office of the Auditor General’s website). REDD-Monitor looks forward to seeing an English translation of the full 137-page report.

Key findings of the Office of the Auditor General’s report:

The results of REDD+ so far are delayed and uncertain

  • Conflicts of interest and alternating political priorities in the partner countries prevent and delay measures and results.
  • In five out of eight of the bilateral cooperation cases, payment for emission reductions has been delayed.
  • The weak implementation of REDD+ at the national level and in central tropical forest countries means that stopping logging in one place can still be replaced by logging elsewhere.

The Norwegian contribution to REDD+ has not triggered enough funding from other donors

  • Norway is the largest donor of funds for REDD +. Compared with other major donors, Britain and Germany, Norway accounted for 51 percent of the contributions in the period 2008-2016.

The control of the implementation and results of REDD + does not work well enough

  • There is not good enough follow-up of social and environmental safeguard mechanisms, such as indigenous peoples’ rights, poverty alleviation and conservation of natural forests. The recipient countries have little reporting. The Ministry of Climate and Environment does not compensate sufficiently for this.
  • Measurement, reporting and verification of reductions in emissions due to REDD+ are only partially in place. Progress on this work has been low in Brazil, and elsewhere.

The Ministry of Climate and Environment is not systematic enough in the collection and use of information about the results of Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative

  • The Ministry of Climate and Environment has developed a framework for measuring progress towards milestones and targets. However, a small system of data retrieval and analysis weakens the ministry’s foundation for management and learning from REDD+ testing.

The ministries’ follow-up of risk of fraud is not good enough

  • The survey shows cases where the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Climate and Environment have not prevented, followed up and handled the risk of fraud against Norwegian recipients of Norwegian funds.

The Office of the Auditor General’s report also makes a series of recommendations for the Ministry of the Environment and the Environment:

  • further develop measures to address the need for lasting results in REDD+ through work towards the UN Climate Change Convention and in bilateral cooperation
  • strengthen the Ministry’s information base on the safeguarding of social and environmental security mechanisms in payments for results
  • strengthen the follow-up of the Norwegian contribution to REDD+ through systematic retrieval and processing of information about progress and results in Norway’s Climate and Forest Initiative
  • provide responsible and active follow-up of risk and use of responses to deviations and alerts about possible financial fraud
  •  

    Tweet about this on Twitter
    Twitter
    Share on LinkedIn
    Linkedin
    Share on Facebook
    Facebook
    Email this to someone
    email

    Related

1 thought on “Norway’s Office of the Auditor General investigation into Norway’s rainforest billions: “Progress and results delayed, uncertain feasibility and effect, risk of fraud not well managed””

  1. Chris Lang says:
    7 August 2020 at 11:58 am

    An English translation of the report is available here (and here).

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“What we should be discussing is not floors on price, but governments setting more ambitious targets, which in turn would result in a higher short-term price until such time that the market achieves those targets and the price falls again. The best-case scenario is a very ambitious target and a low price, which would be an indication that the target is close to being achieved.”

— James Emanuel, head of environmental markets at STX Services BV, October 2011

Recent Posts

  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Some questions for Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of Plant-for-the-Planet

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Chris Lang on Why has the Financial Conduct Authority not taken down the website of the clone scam “Good Investment Advisors”?

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!