Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Donald Trump’s plans to wreck the planet

Posted on 9 November 20168 February 2017

Donald Trump’s election victory is bad news for all sorts of reasons. For climate change it’s a disaster. The United States is going to have a president who thinks that global warming is a Chinese hoax.

When Hillary Clinton confronted him with this during a presidential debate, he said “I did not. I do not say that.” But he did. Here’s the tweet:

The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) 6 November 2012

Trump is a climate change denier

It’s not easy to know what Trump thinks. As Noam Chomsky points out in an interview with Democracy Today,

It’s not even clear that he knows what he thinks. He’s kind of a loose cannon. All kinds of statements come out, sometimes some statement plus the negation of that statement within a few minutes.

But on climate change Trump is consistent. And wrong. He’s tweeted about climate change almost one hundred times.

Here he is on Fox News telling us that “the scientists are having a lot of fun” with the global warming “hoax”:

Trump wants to “cancel” the Paris Agreement

Trump has said he’ll “cancel” the Paris Agreement. He says it’s “bad for US business” and that the Paris Agreement allows “foreign bureaucrats control over how much energy we use”.

Of course, the Paris Agreement is way too weak to address climate change. Climate scientist James Hansen describes it as a “fraud”, because there is “no action, just promises”.

But if the USA pulls out, it will make the Paris Agreement even weaker.

Under the terms of the Paris Agreement, countries can only pull out three years after it came into force (4 November 2016). It would then take one year from when the USA gave the UN notice that it was leaving.

Or, the USA could pull out of the UNFCCC. That would take one year.

What’s more likely is that under Trump, the USA will just make little or no effort to reduce its emissions. This matters for two reasons. First, the USA accounts for 13% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Second, if the USA doesn’t reduce its emissions, India, China and other countries are less likely to reduce theirs.

China has criticised Trump’s plans to pull out of the Paris Agreement.

Zou Ji, deputy director general at China’s National Center for Climate Change Strategy and International Cooperation, is reported in the Guardian as saying that,

“China’s climate strategy and policy is in accordance with China’s national interest, and is not dependent on the US presidency.

“The fundamental incentive is China’s need to drive growth by escalating the economic transition, improving air quality, boosting growth rate by efficiency improvement, and strengthening energy security. After all, it is a matter of innovation of development path.”

Hopefully, then, Trump will not be able to increase China’s emissions. But he can certainly increase the USA’s.

Trump plans to increase the USA’s emissions

While climate change hardly featured as a topic during the election campaing, Trump has mentioned his plans to wreck the planet a few times:

  • April 2016: Trump said he would close down the Environmental Protection Agency, although he managed to get the name wrong, calling it the Department of Environmental.
     
  •  

  • May 2016: Trump called for reducing restrictions on energy exploration, opening up more federal lands to drilling, reopening negotiations to build the Keystone XL pipeline, and reopening coal mines.
  •  

  • October 2016: Trump said he would raise money for inner city infrastructure by stopping funding for climate change:
     

    I will also cancel all wasteful climate change spending from Obama-Clinton, including all global warming payments to the United Nations. These steps will save $100 billion over 8 years, and this money will be used to help rebuild the vital infrastructure, including water systems, in America’s inner cities.

  •  

    • Twitter
    • Linkedin
    • Reddit
    • email
    • Facebook

4 thoughts on “Donald Trump’s plans to wreck the planet”

  1. Suryanarayana Reddy says:
    10 November 2016 at 4:58 am

    If he adopts that kind of attitudes and plans it will become nothing but ‘Suicidal Act’ to the Land of America in particular and others in general.

  2. Chris Lang says:
    10 November 2016 at 12:31 pm

    Trump’s Energy Plan has disappeared from his campaign website. But here’s an archive copy.

    Here’s what we can look forward to from Trump over the next 100 days:

  3. Chris Lang says:
    10 November 2016 at 9:40 pm

    Carbon Brief has lots of reactions from climate scientist to Trump’s election win:

    US election: Climate scientists react to Donald Trump’s victory

  4. Chris Lang says:
    10 November 2016 at 9:42 pm

    And 376 scientists warning back in September 2016, that a Trump win really wouldn’t be such a good thing:

    An Open Letter Regarding Climate Change From Concerned Members of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Chris Lang on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Recent Posts

  • “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance letter to Pogio Ghate, Minister for Environment, Conservation and Climate Change
  • Ecomapuá Amazon REDD Project, Brazil: Pública investigation reveals Ecomapuá Conservação is selling “illegal” carbon offsets from land it does not own, without transferring the money to local communities
  • Response from Steve Zwick, Verra: “Verra will ask Kanaka Management Systems to cease and desist any actions that may mislead communities into thinking that Verra has not already rejected the project”

Recent Comments

  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Chris Lang on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!