Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Kenya: The impact of evictions from the Embobut forest on Sengwer indigenous women

Posted on 6 November 201619 June 2020
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Since the 1960s, the Sengwer indigenous people living in the Embobut forest have been evicted many times. In recent years, the evictions have intensified.

The Kenya Forest Service (KFS) carried out the evictions, and remains committed to evictions. Last year, a KFS officer said that, “Burning of houses will continue as long as the Sengwer build houses inside the forest”.

A new report, published by the Forest Peoples Programme, looks at the impact of these evictions on Sengwer women. The report is written by Milka Chepkorir of Maseno University in Kenya. Chepkorir is a Sengwer woman.

Chepkorir explains why she carried out her research:

In contexts such as this, women have been known to face harassment. For this reason I set out to hear from them, through interviews, about their experience of evictions. I also aimed to get a true representation of their involvement in the struggle against forceful evictions and for recognition as a community. It is vital to understand women’s involvement and their decision-making power on issues that affect them and their children more directly in order to both safeguard them from harm and give a greater voice to their successes.

Chepkorir found that many Sengwer women have been affected directly by forceful evictions. All the women she spoke to reported living in constant fear. “Life has become difficult for Sengwer women and their families,”Chepkorir writes.

Sengwer women have faced psychological torture, physical abuse, assault and extreme poverty due to destruction of homes and shelters. The destruction of their homes particularly affects women, Chepkorir writes, because in Sengwer culture these are the spaces traditionally occupied by women and children.

KFS officers abuse Sengwer women verbally and physically, including sexual violence, during the evictions.

One woman told Chepkorir what happened when she was evicted, in June 2015:

“It was around 5am when I heard some noises from outside my hut; I thought the cow had broken its shade to graze. When I came out to find out, a man caught me and warned me not to scream. He covered my mouth and threw me to the ground; I remember being slapped several times and asked if I could go inside to get my belongings. As soon as I had finished, my house was set on fire and I watched it burn to ashes. My utensils and sufurias (cooking pots) were also broken using pangas and completely destroyed. I was arrested and was taken to the KFS camp with my baby on my back and some of my luggage on my head… my husband was not around so I had to call him from a neighbour’s phone to inform him of what had just happened.”

An elder explained that in the past men were arrested and women were chased away during evictions. Recently this has changed. Women are arrested and phone their husbands to come and make a payment for their release.

Sengwer family life has been disrupted by the evictions. Many men have moved to other parts of the country to look for new homes and land for their families. The clans and kinship system of the Sengwer is breaking down, affecting the traditional rules that guide marriages and other traditional Sengwer practices.

One group of women told Chepkorir that since they were evicted from the forest their families have scattered. Their children married or had children with close family members, despite the fact that this is forbidden among the Sengwer, and other communities in Kenya.

With the men gone for long periods of time, women are left to provide for their families. But often they have no business experience and have never earned wages.

Women are forced to become labourers on other people’s farms, in order to be able to provide food for their children. One woman said,

“We now go for waged labour which does very little to feed our families. Ever since we were evicted from the forest, we have lived in small, cold structures (other people’s potato stores) with the children. There has been no life for us since we were moved out of the forest.”

Kopyatich and Teriki are women in their 60s. They were born in the forest, but have lived outside the forest for about five years because of the evictions. They were facing a lot of challenges, Chepkorir writes, including extreme poverty and malnutrition. Kopyatich said,

“When was a woman even allowed to cut down a green tree? Why don’t they just allow women and their children to go back and live in the glades? Our children are suffering from diseases they never suffered from when we lived in the forest; there are a lot of problems and bad health conditions. We would just like to be allowed to access our herbs, good and fresh air and clean water in the forest for our children and grandchildren.”

Chepkorir concludes that the “evictions affected women and children more than other members of the community”.  But she found that women were not included in community meetings about the evictions and the struggle to get their ancestral land returned to the community. She makes the following suggestions, to include women in the meetings:

The whole community should be aware and well informed on the importance of gender equity and gender balance when it comes to representing the community needs and rights. This will reduce chances of conflicts arising between couples and families whenever a woman is involved in the struggle.


Facilitation should be provided where possible to enable women to participate in and represent the needs of the community. If possible, meetings should be held close to their homes so they are able to attend them and give their views.

 


Posted on Conservation Watch, 21 October 2016.
 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

2 thoughts on “Kenya: The impact of evictions from the Embobut forest on Sengwer indigenous women”

  1. Cassandra says:
    7 November 2016 at 11:53 pm

    The recent evictions of the Sengwer People have been linked to World Bank-funded REDD.
    In “Stopping the Continent Grab and the REDD-ification of Africa”, REDD is denounced as a new form of violence against women.
    http://no-redd-africa.org/images/pdf/Books/redd-book2015.compressed.pdf
    See also “Forced Relocation of Sengwer People proves urgency of canceling REDD”
    http://wrm.org.uy/other-relevant-information/forced-relocation-of-sengwer-people-proves-urgency-of-canceling-redd/
    “Kenya preparing for REDD in the Embobut Forest and forcing the Sengwer People ‘into extinction'”
    http://no-redd-africa.org/index.php/27-countries/kenya/96-kenya-preparing-for-redd-in-the-embobut-forest-and-forcing-sengwer-people-into-extinction

  2. Chris Lang says:
    8 November 2016 at 8:58 am

    @Cassandra – Thanks for this. There are several articles about the evictions of the Sengwer on REDD-Monitor, collected here. (By the way, I recently created a page to help readers find their way around REDD-Monitor’s more than 1,600 posts: Looking for something?)

    I agree with you, the World Bank’s role in these evictions is important, so thanks for pointing this out.

    Here are a few posts on REDD-Monitor, relating to the World Bank’s involvement:

    March 2014: No REDD in Africa Network: “Forced Relocation of Sengwer People proves urgency of canceling REDD”.

    September 2014: Evictions of Sengwer indigenous people: World Bank violates safeguards in Kenya

    October 2014: World Bank project failed to protect Sengwer indigenous rights. Bank now promises to help “find a lasting, peaceful resolution to this long unfinished business of land rights in Kenya”

    March 2015: Just days before a meeting to resolve the crisis in the Embobut Forest, the Kenya Forest Service torched 30 houses – this post includes some questions for the World Bank about the evictions.

    March 2015: Response from the World Bank regarding Sengwer evictions in Kenya: “The dialogue initiated at the Colloquium was invaluable and must be continued” – this post includes a response from the World Bank, which fails to answer any of my questions.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“Even what we do in both developed and developing countries by cutting emissions, we have not got any chance to reach this [2°C] target unless we stop deforestation.”

— Henriette Westhrin, Norwegian Minister of Environment, October 2012

Recent Posts

  • Coalition for Rainforest Nations announces sale of 6,106 REDD credits from Papua New Guinea to Blackstone Energy Services
  • Carbonballs: Nigel Farage, carbon offset lobbyist
  • Kevin Conrad signs REDD deal with Papua New Guinea
  • Court of Appeal upholds conviction of Paul Moore, Michael Moore, and Haydon Driscoll, the men behind the Burbank of London carbon credit investment scam
  • Court of Appeal upholds conviction of carbon conman Sami Raja. In his 2019 trial, Raja’s legal representatives withdrew because “they were professionally embarrassed”

Recent Comments

  • Abel Ateu on The return of the carbon cowboys: How NIHT Inc failed to get free, prior and informed consent for REDD in New Ireland, Papua New Guinea
  • Sander van den Ende on Kevin Conrad signs REDD deal with Papua New Guinea
  • Eyedeal on “Returns up to 895%” and other misleading statements from Property Frontiers about investments in EcoPlanet Bamboo and Silva Tree
  • Chris Lang on Carbonballs: Nigel Farage, carbon offset lobbyist
  • Steve Zwick on Carbonballs: Nigel Farage, carbon offset lobbyist

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!