• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Response from Siti Nurbaya, Indonesia’s Minister of Environment and Forestry: The Norwegian Government has apologised for its environment minister’s statement about “slow progress” on deforestation

Posted on 5 March 20166 June 2017

IndonesiaTwo days ago, REDD-Monitor wrote a post about a trip to Indonesia by Norway’s climate and environment minister, Vidar Helgesen. The trip took place in early February 2016, and Pilita Clark, a Financial Times journalist, accompanied Helgesen on his trip. In her article, Clark quoted Helgesen as saying, “We would obviously have hoped things would have progressed more quickly. We haven’t seen actual progress in reducing deforestation.”

Yesterday, Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment and Forestry put out a press release responding to Helgesen’s comments. A translation of the press release is posted in full below.

The press release also responds to an article by Hans Nicholas Jong and Ina Parlina, published in the Jakarta Post on 4 February 2016, under the headline, “Norway slams slow REDD+ project progress”.

In a press conference after a meeting with President Joko Widowo, Helgesen praised Jokowi’s proposal for a ban on clearing clearing and draining undisturbed peatland. He also praised Jokowi for setting up the Peatland Restoration Agency (BRG). But Helgesen also spoke about the slow progress on reducing deforestation in Indonesia:

“Six years into the partnership, we are now impatient to see more results on the ground.”
[ . . . ]
“We are very satisfied with the dialogue we have had [and] with the groundwork that has been put in place but I don’t think anyone can be satisfied when we see the fires last year, when we see continued deforestation [and] when we see continued peat conversion.”
[ . . . ]
“[Indonesia has implemented] the partial moratorium, which is good, but it’s not possible at this stage to declare success because deforestation is continuing. We all know what happened to the peatland last year.”

Nurbaya, Jokowi, Helgesen, Traavik

Here is a translation of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry press release (hat tip to Elfian Effendi, founder of the website foresthints.news):

The Minister of Environment and Forestry’s response to the statement of the Norwegian Minister of Environment

 
PRESS RELEASE Number: S. 163 / PR / PP / HMS.3 / 3/2016
 
Jakarta, Bureau of Public Relations of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Friday, 4 March 2016. The Minister of Environment and Forestry Siti Nurbaya regrets a recent statement by Norwegian Environment Minister Vidar Helgesen, which discredits the Government of Indonesia. Helgesen expressed dissatisfaction with the perceived slow progress of the Norway-Indonesia partnership in reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Helgesen’s comments were carried by the Jakarta Post Friday, 4 February 2016, and the article published on the REDD-Monitor website dated 3 March 2016.
 
Minister Siti Nurbaya is regretful that the Norwegian minister had failed to fully explain to the public what he meant by “slow progress” in the implementation of the partnership between the two countries, given that the Government of Joko Widodo was still in the process of conducting a review as to how the partnership could be made more effective going ahead. The partnership agreement was signed in late May, 2010.
 
Minister Siti Nurbaya says that the Norwegian Government has apologised for its environment minister’s statement to the Joko Widodo administration.
 
It needs to be made clear to the public that the Norwegian minister has also apologised for his remarks. Thus, there is no need for a prolonged and unproductive polemic on the issue that could damage bilateral collaboration between Indonesia and Norway.
 
As the Norway-Indonesia partnership is a partnership of equals, if “slow progress” had been made on the implementation of the partnership, the responsibility for this could not be entirely blamed on the Government of Indonesia.
 
It is most assuredly not the case that the perceived “slow progress” has taken place during the term of the current administration, especially as regards the consolidation of the institutions responsible for responding to climate change. In reality, such consolidation resulted in greater focus in the development of policies and climate change response programs. It has been clearly shown that such consolidation was intended to strengthen the response to the high rates of deforestation that had occurred during the terms of the previous administration
 
This requires the sorting out of concessions granted on peatland, a process that is currently being undertaken by the present administration. Among other things, the government has imposed a new licensing moratorium policy in peatland areas and has retaken control of burned concessions. This is part of the government’s policy for the more sustainable allocation of land and forest areas in the future, and the reorientation of forestry policy towards ecosystem restoration so as to support sustainable development.
 
The government is also focussing on promoting renewable energy by imposing ever increasing levels of mandatory biodiesel use, despite the fact that world oil prices had fallen sharply. This reflects a clear commitment on the part of the present government to ensuring a future sustainable energy for Indonesia.
 
Greater balance between conservation and development was also being promoted through the acceleration of the one map policy (scale of 1:50.000), which was supported by a Presidential Decree. The commitments contained in the Mid-Term National Development Plan (RPJMN) on climate change and sustainable development are also very clear. Much of the progress to date in this respect had been made by the current administration.
 
All of of the changes currently taking place reflect the firm commitment of the government. Consequently, the use of the expression “slow progress” by the Norwegian Environment Minister does not reflect his views on the work of the current administration.
 
Cooperation between equals involves mutual respect and appreciation, such as in the case of the partnership between Norway and Indonesia. Consequently bilateral cooperation between Norway and Indonesia must be truly based on such mutual respect going forward.

 

5 thoughts on “Response from Siti Nurbaya, Indonesia’s Minister of Environment and Forestry: The Norwegian Government has apologised for its environment minister’s statement about “slow progress” on deforestation”

  1. Carlo Castellani says:
    5 March 2016 at 3:11 pm

    While the minister talks Indonesian forests are going up in smoke……

  2. Josef Kuhn says:
    5 March 2016 at 3:28 pm

    Why all the political bafflegab about deforestation? With the sophisticated remote sensing technology available to these two countries and people everywhere concerned about carbon emissions to our atmosphere, the facts about clearing and burning of forests and other vegetated lands can easily be made clear.

  3. Prem says:
    5 March 2016 at 5:25 pm

    The government is also focussing on promoting renewable energy by imposing ever increasing levels of mandatory biodiesel use……….oh…! do not do this, just import more ‘Statoil’ and the ‘partner of equals’ will be happy.

  4. indradi says:
    7 March 2016 at 7:40 am

    the Government of Joko Widodo was still in the process of conducting a review as to how the partnership could be made more effective going ahead…while 2 million Ha of forests and peat land go up in smoke only in 4 months of forest fire.

  5. arykenan says:
    24 April 2016 at 4:16 pm

    I’m following your website since 2009, really nice web. fyi i was there with Carbon Conservation on Ulu Masen Project and all i can say that Indonesia government wasn’t ready for massive scale of REDD such as Ulumasen. And i think there is no way REDD will succeed in Indonesia especially with Jokowi as President because all of his policies is to optimized nature resouces for the sake of Indonesian people, something that should do long time ago. So there is no room for gain money from conservation as it face to face with economy interest

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Chris Lang on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Recent Posts

  • Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance letter to Pogio Ghate, Minister for Environment, Conservation and Climate Change
  • Ecomapuá Amazon REDD Project, Brazil: Pública investigation reveals Ecomapuá Conservação is selling “illegal” carbon offsets from land it does not own, without transferring the money to local communities
  • Response from Steve Zwick, Verra: “Verra will ask Kanaka Management Systems to cease and desist any actions that may mislead communities into thinking that Verra has not already rejected the project”
  • Response from Kanaka Management Services: “Please do not conduct legal trail or castigate REDD+ project developers on the website by writing text which shows the project developer in bad light”

Recent Comments

  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Chris Lang on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!