Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Carbonballs: How Carbon Neutral Investments made Newcastle United “carbon positive”

Posted on 16 February 201610 May 2019

Last week, REDD-Monitor wrote about the closure of 19 companies in the High Court in London. The companies sold more than 5 million carbon credits to retail investors, for more than £36 million. Hundreds of pensioners were duped out of their life savings.

One of the companies involved was CNI (UK) Ltd. Edward Carlton, CNI’s director, was previously “Head of UK Operations” at a company called Carbon Neutral Investments.

Until April 2013, Carbon Neutral Investments had provided services for a large number of boiler room operations that sold near-worthless carbon credits to retail investors, at hugely inflated prices. Carbon Neutral Investments also sold carbon credits to companies to make them “carbon neutral”.

In April 2013, Carbon Neutral Investments split into three companies: Gemmax Solutions (which continued to provide services for boiler rooms); CNI (UK) Ltd (which continued to sell carbon credits to companies); and Opus Capital (which got whatever was left of Carbon Neutral Investments).

CNI managed to strike deals with several companies, including two Formula 1 teams (Vodafone Maclaren Mercedes, and Sauber), What Car magazine, the Gumball motor rally, and Newcastle United. (There’s a list of CNI’s clients at the end of this post: “Carbon Neutral Investments and CNI (UK) Ltd“).

On Naked Capitalism, Richard Smith describes how CNI worked:

So there we are: on the one hand, schmoozing the rich and famous on the Formula 1 circuit, and on the other, providing custody, clearing and payment services (whatever those might be), to nasty little boiler rooms, while the FCA looks on and wrings its hands. Such is Carbon Neutral Investments.

Here’s part of the schmoozing side of CNI’s operations. Edward Carlton (director of CNI) is shaking hands with Alan Pardew, then-manager at Newcastle United. On Carlton’s left is Paul Seakens (director of Carbon Neutral Investments and Gemmax Solutions):

2016-02-16-154347_1128x1026_scrot

Thanks to CNI, Newcastle United became the world’s first “carbon positive” football club:

CNI’s offset program, following a detailed analysis of NUFC’s residual energy emissions, produced a detailed CO2e profile for the club and the club went beyond zero emissions by off-setting more carbon than the operation emits, and in doing so, becomes the world’s first football club to be truly ‘carbon positive’.

An energy consulting firm, GET Solutions, advised Newcastle United on reducing its greenhouse gas emissions. We don’t know how much Newcastle United paid for CNI’s carbon credits, or where the carbon credits came from. But we do know that by November 2013, Newcastle United was no longer listed as one of CNI’s clients.

Edward Carlton’s eloquent explanation of the deal with Newcastle United qualifies as the latest in REDD-Monitor’s “Carbonballs” series. It has been preserved for posterity in the form of a Newcastle United publicity video.

Here’s how Carlton explains the deal:

Carlton“It’s the first time any club has done this, er you know, so it’s a real kind of industry first and we want to be here to come and support, er, Newcastle in achieving this, er, really what we think is a great message.

“I think it’s massive, you know the Newcastle name is a strong name, er, for us at Carbon Neutral Investments and also the work that GET’s been doing the last few years, I think it’s testament to the fact that, you know, we like to align ourselves to a company with such a powerful name, er you know, it’s a strong club, it’s a club of, of heritage and pedigree and for us that’s what it’s all about, you know. We’re looking forward to the future, trying to build on, er you know, a green and a sustainable future and that’s what, kind of you know, I think we’re really laying the foundations to do here today.

“Clubs like this, floodlights, you know, the whole facilities, everything that goes on, a) has a huge electricity usage, but you know on top of that, that’s quite a large carbon footprint, and I think a lot of people take it for granted, erm, you know it’s not necessarily the most exciting thing on the tops of most people’s agenda, but more and more it’s getting pushed to the, er, to the front, you know we have the green Olympics this year, becoming carbon neutral, and you know, I think this is a, you know, a real sign of people who are pro-active, like the club, you know, sticking their heads up above the parapet and, you know, being willing to take that, that statement saying this is the right thing to do and, you know, here we are today.”

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!