Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

The Misak Indigenous People, Colombia: “We don’t want a development plan. What we want is a Life Plan.”

Posted on 12 January 201613 October 2016
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

The Misak are an indigenous people whose territory is in Cauca, high in the Andes mountains in Colombia. During Spanish colonial rule, they lost large parts of their territory, but in he 1980s they started a process of reclaiming their land. Eventually they gained formally recognised land rights.

Since then, the Misak have developed their Life Plan as a way of ensuring their own self-determined development. Life Plans represent Indigenous Peoples’ opportunity to decide their vision of the future as a community.

Their territory covers about 15,000 hectares. They have farmed the land, which is too high for trees to grow, for hundreds of years. More than two-thirds of the land is sacred sites.

Life Mosaic’s video “Life Plan” looks at the Life Plan of the Misak. It’s part of Life Mosaic’s series “Territories of Life“, that REDD-Monitor has been featuring in recent months.

The aim of the video is not to show other indigenous communities how to write their Life Plans, but the Misak’s Life Plan gives many useful insights for communities writing their Life Plans.

Liliana Muelas, a Misak Leader, explains the differrence between state promoted development plans, which are written from an economic perspective and her community’s Life Plan:

“We don’t want a development plan. What we want is a life plan. And what is life for us? It is territory, our languages, our own customs, our oral traditions. The state brings its development plan model with its specific projects and we say, ‘No Mr. State. That is your model. Our model is the life plan. That comes from our autonomy and puts forward our vision of education, our vision of health care, our vision of how we want to live and be.'”

The Misak were the first indigenous people in Colombia to propose a Life Plan. They started developing their Life Plan in the late 1980s. In the video, Misak Leader Jeremias Tunubala says,

Our experience as the Misak people in Colombia has allowed us to contribute something to the 102 indigenous peoples in Colombia. We are the first ancestral people in the country to propose this Life Plan, the Plan de Vida.

During the 1980s, the Misak entered the estates on their land and started working the land that was rightfully theirs.

“Well, we haven’t only reclaimed the land. We have recovered everything that our ancestors lost,” Misak Leader Javier Calambas says. Now, the Misak even have their own University, the Misak University.

The first step in developing a Life Plan involves moving away from state models and state proposals. The Life Plan
belongs to the community and is based on how the community sees its life in the future. A crucial aspect is the wide participation of all the community.

The Misak Life Plan has four fundamental pillars: territory; autonomy; identity; and self-determination. The single objective of the Life Plan is to survive as a culture, as a People.

Other steps in developing the Life Plan include relearning the history of the community and understanding what the community has been through as a People. Mapping the territory, the population, farmland, and resources is also important. This also includes identifying the threats to the territory.

Then the plan has to be implemented. The Misak describe the Life Plan as a platform of defence against corporations and the state.

Resources

LifeMosaic’s website includes a resources page, with links to the following reports related to this video:

  • Thinking Together For Those Coming Behind Us: An Outline Plan for the Care of Wapichan Territory, The indigenous peoples of the South Rupununi, 2012.
  • Thinking Together For Those Coming Behind Us (Summary), The indigenous peoples of the South Rupununi, 2012.
  • Biocultural Community Protocols: A Toolkit for Community Facilitators, Natural Justice, 2012.

 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“Unfortunately, and despite years of debate within the environmental policy community, there is no commonly held precise understanding of what additionality means or how to best implement it.”

— Michael Gillenwater, Greenhouse Gas Management Institute, January 2012

Recent Posts

  • How REDD greenwashes Glencore’s coal mining operations in Colombia
  • The Durban Declaration on Carbon Trading
  • Book review: “Forest Conservation and Sustainability in Indonesia” by Bernice Maxton-Lee
  • Plant for the Planet: Felix Finkbeiner’s fake forests
  • Open letter to the lead authors of ‘Protecting 30% of the Planet for Nature’: “This paper reads to us like a proposal for a new model of colonialism”

Recent Comments

  • Chris Lang on Directors of Tullett Brown, Foxstone Carr, Carvier Limited get 14 year director bans
  • Alan Potkin on The Durban Declaration on Carbon Trading
  • Sabhrina Gita Aninta on Book review: “Forest Conservation and Sustainability in Indonesia” by Bernice Maxton-Lee
  • Erin on Savraj Gata-Aura sentenced to four years in prison for his role in the Bar Works investment scam
  • Lesley Walford on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!