• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

How indigenous peoples are using the law to defend their territories

Posted on 19 November 201519 November 2015

Communities are using national law, regional law and international law to fight against the takeover of their lands. This new video by LifeMosaic looks at how communities are using the law in three countries; Indonesia, Tanzania and Paraguay.

The video, “Using the Law”, is another video in LifeMosaic’s series “Territories of Life“. It investigates the risks and advantages of going to court.

Indonesia

In March 2012, AMAN (The Indigenous Peoples’ Alliance of the Archipelago) and two indigenous communities, Kuntu in Sumatra, and Cisitu in Java, filed a case with Indonesia’s Constitutional Court. They hoped to amend Indonesia’s 1999 Forestry Law, which declared that customary forests and much of indigenous peoples’ territory were state forest land.

In May 2013, the Constitutional Court ruled that indigenous peoples’ customary forests are not state forests.

Abdon Nababan of AMAN explains the importance of the ruling and what should happen next:

“Of course, the struggle is still long after the Constitutional Court’s ruling. The ruling is not enough but must be strengthened by other legal instruments. Above all we need to accelerate the adoption of the law and the recognition and the protection of indigenous peoples.”

While the Constitutional Court ruling was an important step for the recognition of indigenous rights in Indonesia, a recent article in the Jakarta Post notes that “not a single customary forest had been declared by the government to be the property of the indigenous community”, more than two years after the ruling.

Tanzania

The Maasai indigenous people went to the National Court to question the legality of the loss of their lands to National Parks. Samwel Nangiria, a Maasai, explains why they went to court;

“We were trying to challenge why is that the Maasai are evicted in their villages? Is this consitutional? We were trying to challenge why that the companies are heavily supported by the military in Tanzania, especially when it comes to the indigenous peoples’ territories? We were challenging the mass violation of human rights. People being shot. People apprehended. Livelihoods being destroyed. And we wanted the clarity of the court, whether this is constitutional.”

The Maasai found there were limitations in taking the case to court. It was expensive in terms of money and time. Companies can influence the running of the courts. The case was launched in 2010. It has not yet been concluded.

Paraguay

The Sawhoyamaxa community recently won a case to retain their ancestral land. Leonardo Gonzalez, from the Enxet community in Paraguay says,

“The cattle rancher took control of our lands and deforested 3,000 hectares of our forests. We didn’t have the freedom to keep our culture going. We went to the Interamerican Court of Human Rights and the court recognised our rights as an indigenous people.

But it was eight years before the ruling was enforced. Only after a series of protests, road blockades, and demonstrations in front of Congress was the claim recognised.

Resources

LifeMosaic’s website includes a resources page, with links to the following reports related to this video:

  • The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, United Nations, 2008.
  • Learn and Exercise your rights: A simplified version of the UNDRIP, AIPP, IWGIA et al, 2013.
  • Training Manual on the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, AIPP, 2010.
  • The Community Guide to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Australian Human Rights Commission, 2010.
  • UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples on Free, Prior and Informed Consent Poster, AIPP, 2012.
  • The Right to Self-Determination and Development of Indigenous Peoples, AIPP, 2014.
  • Rights in Action: Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) for Indigenous Peoples Comic, AIPP, 2013.
  • UN Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples on Rights to Lands, Territories & Resources Poster, AIPP, 2012.
  • Indigenous & Tribal Peoples’ Rights In Practice: A guide to ILO Convention No. 169, ILO / Pro 169, 2009.

 

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Chris Lang on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Recent Posts

  • Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance letter to Pogio Ghate, Minister for Environment, Conservation and Climate Change
  • Ecomapuá Amazon REDD Project, Brazil: Pública investigation reveals Ecomapuá Conservação is selling “illegal” carbon offsets from land it does not own, without transferring the money to local communities
  • Response from Steve Zwick, Verra: “Verra will ask Kanaka Management Systems to cease and desist any actions that may mislead communities into thinking that Verra has not already rejected the project”
  • Response from Kanaka Management Services: “Please do not conduct legal trail or castigate REDD+ project developers on the website by writing text which shows the project developer in bad light”

Recent Comments

  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Chris Lang on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!