Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Amnesty International on the Sengwer evictions in Kenya: “The allegations of house burnings are credible and require investigation by the competent authorities”

Posted on 9 June 201519 June 2020
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Since December 2013, REDD-Monitor has been following the evictions of the Sengwer indigenous people who live in the Cherangany Hills. The evictions have been going on for many years, at the hands of armed Kenya Forest Service guards, who have evicted the Sengwer and burned down their homes.

In March 2015, a meeting took place in Eldoret, organised by the World Bank and Kenya’s Ministry of Environment, Water and Natural Resources. The meeting aimed to find a positive way forward following years of evictions from Kenya’s forested areas.

The Sengwer were one of the indigenous peoples represented at the meeting in Eldoret. But just before the meeting started, the Sengwer released a statement describing how the Kenya Forest Service had started a new wave evictions and had burned down more than 30 houses.

After the meeting, REDD-Monitor received an email from Anne Kaari, Head Corporate Communication at the Kenya Forest Service. “There are no evictions that have taken place in the recent past,” she wrote. She also sent a press statement by Dr Richard Lesiyampe, Principal Secretary at the Ministry of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, two newspaper clippings, and a report of a helicopter trip over the Embobut forest in early March 2015. You can read all of this, here.

On 3 June 2015, REDD-Monitor received this response from Amnesty International:

    The allegations of house burnings are credible and require investigation by the competent authorities

     
    Amnesty International, 3 June 2015
     
    An article entitled ‘Kenya Forest Service: “There are no evictions that have taken place in the recent past”’, on the website of REDD Monitor on 17 March 2015, includes a response by the Ministry of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, to an e-mail from REDD Monitor concerning the allegations by representatives of the Sengwer community that the Kenya Forestry Service is continuing to burn their houses in the Embobut Forest. It also includes a press release by the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry, and the minutes of a meeting of people who took part in a helicopter visit to the Embobut forest to look into the Sengwer allegations.

    Amnesty International took part in the helicopter visit. Amnesty does not share the view that the helicopter visit demonstrated the Sengwer community’s allegations to be unfounded, as the Ministry’s e-mail claims.

    There was an agreement in advance that each helicopter group would include a Sengwer guide who would guide the pilot to sites of house burnings, and the helicopter would land to enable a closer examination, and where possible, interviews with the victims. Despite this agreement only one of the three groups landed. Only two groups included a Sengwer guide. Amnesty International’s researcher was in one of the helicopter groups that did not land. The pilot of this group ignored the Sengwer guide’s directions to sites of burnt houses. He also ignored repeated requests to land.

    The group that landed saw 3 houses that had been burnt, and interviewed the people to whom the houses belonged, who stated that the houses had been burnt by KFS guards.

    Amnesty International and Forest Peoples Programme researchers spoke to a number of Sengwer representatives and visited the forest on foot after the colloquium. In the view of the two organisations, the allegations of house burnings are credible and require investigation by the competent authorities.

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“This shows some of the fundamental problems with emissions trading. We are getting the worst of two worlds. The (carbon) prices are too low to produce the technological shift we need. But they are still high enough to cause some problems for industry and international competition.”

— Steffen Kalbekken, head of research at the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research, September 2012

Recent Posts

  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Some questions for Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of Plant-for-the-Planet

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Chris Lang on Why has the Financial Conduct Authority not taken down the website of the clone scam “Good Investment Advisors”?

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!