Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Will the World Bank fund Guyana’s hot air proposal?

Posted on 14 May 201514 May 2015
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

2015-05-14-154858_1128x1024_scrotAt the end of April 2015, the World Bank’s Carbon Fund held its 12th meeting in Paris. James Singh, head of the Guyana Forestry Commission, gave an “Early Idea Presentation” on Guyana’s Emission Reductions Program Idea Note (ER-PIN).

Singh’s presentation starts with an overview of Guyana. “One of Guyana’s most valued natural assets is its forests,” Singh writes. Forest covers 85% of the country, with 8% in Protected Areas and nearly 15% titled to Indigenous Peoples, “making Amerindians the second largest land owner in Guyana after the Government”.

The annual rate of deforestation for the past 23 years is between 0.02% and 0.078%.

Singh describes Guyana’s Monitoring, Reporting and Verification System. Guyana has carried out four annual assessments (2010-2013). The most recent assessment is for 2013, and is available here. The 261-page report is “issued jointly by Indufor and the Guyana Forestry Commission (GFC)”, suggesting that it is not entirely independent.

Singh’s presentation mentions “sustainable mining”, “sustainable forestry”, and “community forestry”. He mentions Guyana’s “strong political commitment dedicated to natural resources management”, the National Land Use Plan, consultation and participation, stakeholder engagement, safeguards, generating co-benefits, and Guyana’s status of REDD+ readiness.

Obviously, Singh’s presentation doesn’t mention the fact that Guyana has done precisely nothing to improve governance in the forestry or mining sectors. As John Palmer noted in June 2014,

Since the signing of the Norway-Guyana MoU in November 2009, the GoG has made no changes to policy, strategy, laws, regulations or procedures concerning forestry or mining.

The most (perhaps the only) interesting slide in Singh’s presentation is this one:

Guyana is aiming for approximately 22.8 MtCO2e of reductions. This breaks down as follows (the figures are rounded off):

  • 2 million tCO2e reductions from the mining sector
  • 1.3 million tCO2e from the forestry sector
  • 19.5 million tCO2e from “upward adjustment of Guyana’s reference level”

So, Guyana’s early idea for joining in the World Bank’s Carbon Fund party amounts to 14% wishful thinking about forestry and mining, and 86% cooking the books on the reference level.
 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

2 thoughts on “Will the World Bank fund Guyana’s hot air proposal?”

  1. Torben says:
    14 May 2015 at 6:24 pm

    I have always wondered about the comments regarding the reference level deforestation, and in fact, if reference level can even be related to historical deforestation at all. As far as I can see, REDD+ is more or less a trade contract between two countries. Like every trade relationship, the parameters of the trade are agreed by the buyer and the seller. Since REDD+ is a performance contract and countries like Guyana are always free to ignore the contract (and give up the transfer for “avoided” deforestation) should they find it in their interest, “donors” and environmentalists need to make sure that the baseline is generous enough to accommodate swings in timber prices if deforestation is to be avoided. Ideally, one would like to see the price of avoided deforestation (so far 5 USD per ton) being contingent on carbon price and the baseline deforestation being contingent on the market price of the core driver of deforestation. Otherwise, anchoring the baseline deforestation on historical deforestation is a powerless incentive that cannot and will not save trees from deforestation.

  2. Robert Hii says:
    14 May 2015 at 7:17 pm

    Dissected as usual with surgical precision. Oh my, the inside truths are unpleasant.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“In future, if you are running a factory and you desperately need credits to offset your emissions, there will be someone who can make that happen for you. Absolutely, organised crime will be involved.”

— Peter Younger, an environmental crimes specialist at Interpol, May 2009

Recent Posts

  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Some questions for Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of Plant-for-the-Planet

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Chris Lang on Why has the Financial Conduct Authority not taken down the website of the clone scam “Good Investment Advisors”?

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!