Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Protest in Brazil prevents approval of genetically engineered eucalytpus trees

Posted on 11 March 20153 August 2015
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Last week, 300 peasants from Brazil’s Landless Workers’ Movement (MST) occupied a meeting of the National Technical Biosafety Commission (CTNBio) and prevented a vote on the release of genetically engineered eucalyptus trees.

CTNBio had planned to vote on the release of three new transgenic plants, including H421, a genetically engineered eucalyptus trees developed by FuturaGene, a subsidiary of pulp and paper giant Suzano.

The meeting was cancelled, but at any time in the next 30 days CTNBio can hold another extraordinary meeting. Atiliana Brunetto, the national coordination of the MST, described the occuption as a partial victory:

“The most important is that we can take this debate to society. Were it not for these actions, most likely the transgenic eucalyptus plantations would have been released without society knowing about it, and the whole population pays the price.”

Meanwhile, 1,000 woman from the MST occupied FuturaGene’s facilities in Itapetininga, in São Paulo. They sprayed messages on the walls and destroyed seedlings.

According to FuturaGene, the genetically engineered trees produce 20% more wood than Suzano’s conventional trees. The trees would be harvested at five and a half years instead of seven. Stanley Hirsch, FuturaGene’s chief executive, is quoted in a 2014 article in Nature News & Comment as saying that,

The tree’s speedy growth boosts absorption of carbon dioxide from the air by about 12% … aiding in the fight to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. The genetically modified trees may also require less land to produce the same amount of wood, reducing the conversion of natural forest into plantations.

But increasing the growth rate of trees does not reduce the area of industrial tree plantations. As the growth rate increases, so too does the area of plantations. In common with any other large corporation, Suzano continually expands, to repay debt and to keep investors and shareholders happy.

As this graphic in a recent Suzano presentation illustrates, a major expansion in the company’s pulp production is planned:

Expanding pulp production means expanding the area of industrial monocultures to produce the increased amount of wood needed to keep the pulp mills running.

Faster growing trees consume even more water, creating problems as streams dry out and the water table drops. Far from addressing the problems created by industrial tree plantations, Suzano’s proposed genetically engineered trees will only intensify the problems.

Hirsch’s claim that industrial tree plantations of fast growing genetically engineered trees can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions is dangerous nonsense for at least two reasons.

First, while Suzano’s plantations absorb carbon dioxide while they are growing, they are clearcut and fed into pulp mills to produce short-lived paper products. The carbon dioxide returns quickly to the atmosphere.

Second, to stand a (hardly reassuring) 50% chance of keeping global warming below 2C this century, we need to leave two-thirds of fossil fuels below ground. Industrial tree plantations (genetically engineered or not) do not address climate change.
 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“We intend to fulfill part of our domestic targets through purchasing of emission-reduction performances from projects, because that not only helps us achieve our goals, but catalyzes the domestic market. We would not only buy and sell like traditional dealers, but we could package them so that we buy insecure credits and we sell secure credits, and that increases the value quite considerably.”

— Agus Sari, Chair, Working Group on Funding Instruments in Indonesia’s REDD+ Agency, February 2014

Recent Posts

  • Open letter to Mark Carney’s Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets: Carbon offsets are “riddled with fraud and human rights abuses”
  • Mark Carney’s Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets: The global financial elite’s plan to profit from the climate crisis while maintaining business as usual for Big Oil
  • Capitalism is driving us to disaster
  • How REDD greenwashes Glencore’s coal mining operations in Colombia
  • The Durban Declaration on Carbon Trading

Recent Comments

  • Gordon Emery on Open letter to Mark Carney’s Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets: Carbon offsets are “riddled with fraud and human rights abuses”
  • Pam SJ on Mark Carney’s Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets: The global financial elite’s plan to profit from the climate crisis while maintaining business as usual for Big Oil
  • st john on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Gordon Emery on Capitalism is driving us to disaster
  • Jonathan Price (@B3CPres) on Capitalism is driving us to disaster

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!