Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Conservation Central Network’s Little Green Tokens and Big Green Lies

Posted on 6 February 20155 March 2015
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

2015-02-05-215603_1127x984_scrot“Find out how to Save Forests and make money.” That’s the offer on the website of an Australian company called Conservation Central Network. “Using the power of the internet,” CCN says, “we are rewarding people for saving the forests one hectare at a time.”

It sounds great. But if it sounds too good to be true, that’s because it probably is.

Conservation Central Network Pty Ltd has its headquarters in Adelaide, Australia. The company was set up by Campbell Scott and Erminio Kotlar and launched in January 2011. The company was registered in April 2004 and has had two other names since then: Network Games Marketing Pty Ltd; and Carbon Central Network Pty Ltd.

A company called Carbon Central Network (UK) Ltd was registered in the UK in August 2011. In April 2014, it changed its name to Conservation Central Network (UK) Ltd.

Here’s how CCN explains how its “Social Marketing Network” works:

CCN has been able to create a highly rewarding business opportunity: members are invited to become independent distributors and create an income based on the sales generated in their network of friends whilst they participate in CCN’s social cause of saving forest area.

CCN explains that having got involved and become a member (by paying CCN) you then encourage your friends, contacts on Facebook, LinkedIn and so on, to become members (by paying CCN). Then all of these new members do the same with their contacts.

A recent presentation, narrated by CCN co-founder Campbell Scott, explains that,

“CCN works to secure and protect large areas of virgin forests, using it’s [sic] unique Conservation Management System (CMS) to produce carbon credits.”

Scott doesn’t provide any details about the Conservation Management System.

CCN buys carbon credits to “help develop long term business and financial benefits, with their Little Green Token Program”. There’s more on the Little Green Tokens later. In the meantime, here’s what they look like:

9,000 carbon credits per hectare!

The company claims to have projects in Papua New Guinea, Australia, Colombia and Peru, with more under negotiation. “From these forests, we are able to generate hundreds of carbon credits per hectare,” Scott tells us.

For $120 you can “help save a hectare”. Scott explains that one hectare produces up to 300 carbon credits per year. He adds that over 30 years, that’s 9,000 carbon credits, at a “market price minimum of $6”, giving a total of $54,000 per hectare over 30 years.

“CCN has access to millions of hectares, so you can imagine the company’s worth on paper,” says Scott.

Let’s pause Scott’s presentation there for a moment. CCN has been running for four years, yet Scott has fundamentally misunderstood the business he claims to be working in.

Here’s a simplified version of how a REDD project generates carbon credits: If one hectare of forest stores 300 tons of carbon and a REDD project prevents it from being cut down, then that area of forest generates 300 carbon credits over the lifetime of the project.

Not 300 carbon credits per year, as CCN claims.

Of course, CCN’s calculations take no account of any costs involved in running the REDD projects that are supposedly conserving the forest. Or any allowances for buffer zones, leakage, or the fact that some areas of forest may store less carbon. And 300 tons of carbon per hectare seems high to me. As does a $6 price for carbon credits.

Scott assures us that each one of the Little Green Tokens is, “Proof that hectares of forest have been saved.” Phew. That’s a relief.

Little Green Tokens

CCN describes its Little Green Tokens as a carbon credit backed crypto currency. Scott explains that,

“An LGT (Little Green Token) is a new digital asset/currency backed by the proof of conservation activities and values created from those activities when creating Carbon Credits.”

Scott explains that CCN “pays” an “eCo bonus” daily into members’ “Retail Sales Accounts”. “Every time $120 accumulates in your Retail Sales Account, you can claim a Token valued at $150.” For each hectare you can claim two Little Green Tokens.

If you choose to save 50, 100, 200 or 500 hectares (as some members have, according to Scott), then CCN will double the bonus volume.

Scott explains that CCN members can “claim the value from the hectares that they’ve helped save”:

“Right now we find that this is probably by far and most the best way for members to claim the value from the hectares that they’ve helped save. Each Little Green Token is worth $150. It’s asset backed by carbon credits. They are actually held at market right now. And we aim to show you what can drive the price of this Little Green Token up.”

Here’s CCN’s slide illustrating this:

Scott continues his sales pitch:

“The social and co-benefit value created underlying each one of these LGTs is around $664 USD. Now the LGTs sit in a carbon credit pool, er, to provide the asset backing.”

The figure US$664 comes from a report produced by Imperial College London in partnership with the International Carbon Reduction and Offsetting Alliance (ICROA). The co-benefits in the report include poverty alleviation, infrastructure development, fuel savings, and nature conservation (soil protection, water regulation, and biodiversity conservation).

Clearly, this figure is not the “Carbon Credit value”, as Scott claims in his sales pitch. And there is no way that the owner of a carbon credit can make any claim to any of the US$664.

On its website, CCN claims to have more than 6.5 million hectares of “forestry under protection”:

“Current CCN land contracts allow for the release of 75 Million LGTs,” according to Scott’s presentation. That’s an awful lot of Little Green Tokens. And an awful lot of money. For CCN.

Nothing more than a pyramid scheme?

CCN’s website includes a disclaimer: “Conservation Central Network is a conservation company and is not an investment company.” That’s the small print. The large print reads, “BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY”.

CCN requires people to pay a fee to join its Social Marketing Network. Once you’re in, you recruit others to join the scheme, who also have to pay the fee. CCN encourages you to take payments in the form of Little Green Tokens – a virtual currency backed by carbon credits. The company claims to offer “a highly rewarding business opportunity”.

Here’s how the UK’s Action Fraud describes a pyramid scheme:

A fraudster advertises a multi-level investment scheme that offers extraordinary profits for little or no risk.
 
You’re required to pay a fee to enter the investment scheme.
 
You’re then required to recruit friends or family members to enter the scheme. If you do this successfully, you’re paid out of their receipts. They are then told to recruit others to keep the chain going.
 
Your money is not actually invested in any product. Instead, it’s simply passed up the chain of investors.

In 2004, a pyramid scheme called LifeWealth8 collapsed. About 30,000 members lost a total of nearly US$20 million. The director of LifeWealth8 was Erminio Kotlar, the man who a few years later launched CCN.
 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

7 thoughts on “Conservation Central Network’s Little Green Tokens and Big Green Lies”

  1. Fero Gachulinec says:
    6 February 2015 at 9:39 pm

    PLS read the following:
    01/2011 … CCN started their business, CCN sell nonexisting carbon credits via MLM (compensation plan is in their first presentation below) and at the same time CCN use the false certificate and claim that their carbon credits were already generated what is an intentional scam, see their first presentation here: http://www.ie-we.com/ccn/ccn_presentation_english.pptx
    CCN members buy nonexisting carbon credits till 01/2013 and except of MLM provision they earn also ecobonus, which should be min. 0.1 perc. daily from their investments into carbon credits. CCN members,
    mainly me, say Erminio Kotlar we play illegal Ponzi scheme !!! Erminio says: no Ponzi scheme and in 08/2012 in Bratislava Slovakia shows me this excel file:
    http://www.ie-we.com/ccn/asic/ccn_nonexistent_redd_projects_2012.xls
    in order to scam me again (I find out later all REDD projects mentioned in the excel file are either nonexisting or CCN are not involved in them, so CCN „stole“ them ). CCN Holdings Limited was founded also in 08/2012 in Hong Kong as an economically empty company.
    01/2013 … CCN and CCN Holdings Limited HK start another scam: they sell worthless shares of CCN Holdings Limited HK. CCN use in their promo an intentionally grossly misleading balance sheet and P/L from Pearson Partners,concretely from Cyril John Pearson, who was sent to jail, see http://www.crikey.com.au/2001/05/20/the-178-people-asic-has-sent-to-jail/
    116. 31 August 1998 – Cyril John Pearson: former Brisbane company director got 5 years for fraudulently accounting for money, which was put into the Beneflex Retirement Plan superannuation fund.
    01/2015 … CCN and CCN Holdings Limited HK start another scam: they sell worthless Little Green Tokens backed by ecoproject assets of CCN and CCN Holdings Limited, which are almost 0 dollars, see:
    http://www.littlegreentoken.com/

    See also: http://www.ie-we.com/ccn/asic/fg_interpol_financial_crime_report.pdf and http://www.topky.sk/cl/10/1453133/EXKLUZIVNE-Megapodvod-na-Slovakoch–Mysleli-si–ze-zachranuju-planetu–prisli-o-miliony- in Slovak language. This CCN MEGASCAM investigates famous Italian journalist Antonio Aldo Papaleo. World media from Australia, UK, Hong Kong, … will publish this CCN scam in a short time.

  2. scott says:
    7 February 2015 at 5:00 am

    http://ethicnet.uta.fi/belarus/journalists_ethics_code

  3. Jeremy says:
    8 February 2015 at 9:57 pm

    Has anyone info on Noble Rock Partners ? I was contacted by Nicholas Young (FCA Number NXY01005) who says he will convert my VCRs into Emission Reductions for a fee of 32p each and then will purchase them for a swedish company wanting to offset. Offer price is almost 2x purchase price.

  4. Friend of the forrest says:
    9 February 2015 at 3:51 pm

    @Scott
    Ethics of Journalism in Belarus? Why does it apply? Ah… yes… it’s no FREE PRESS STATUS:
    https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2013/belarus#.VNjHguZVOng
    Still they expose questionable business like CCN and questionable businessman like Scott Campbel and Erminio Kotlar

  5. Jan says:
    13 February 2015 at 12:57 pm

    http://m.topky.sk/cl/10/1453133/EXKLUZIVNE-Megapodvod-na-Slovakoch–Mysleli-si–ze-zachranuju-planetu–prisli-o-miliony

    yes CCN is scam, in Czech republic and Slovakia republic is CCN in the news.

    Hey Scot? Who gave you permission to put our money into risky crypto currency?!
    crypto currency used for money laundering you are very clever!

    God bless us at get the money back
    John,

  6. Jiří Šikola says:
    13 February 2015 at 11:53 pm

    Hello Erminio and Campbell. I wrote you email, and you did not answer me. So there is my suggestion atteched bellow published publicly. Let s come to the Czech Republic or Slovakia to stand in front of people and tell them that everything is OK. Please, dont forget to take with you all relevant dokuments (for example audited balance sheet of CCN acounts). There are many investors and shareholders who are interested in it. Im ready to prepare a big meeting on my own expense. You have not been here for a long time and almost no one in CZ and SK believes you!

  7. Fero Gachulinec says:
    5 March 2015 at 4:21 pm

    “CCN NEWS: Release of up to 215,000 LGT’s crypto currency, the Little Green Token. To retail at $150 ea”. But this is equivalent with: 1 carbon credit = 150 $ !!! Very “good” price of carbon credits which will interest for sure also Australian institutions as ACCC, ASIC, … . Unfortunately, CCN have NO PRIMARY CARBON CREDITS !

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“And although it looks like the pledges presented before the December climax of the talks in Paris will fall short of what scientists say is needed, optimists say the binding procedures of the new treaty would commit all nations to come back every few years with even tighter emissions limits, eventually controlling runaway warming.”

— John H. Cushman Jr., InsideClimate News, July 2015

Recent Posts

  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Some questions for Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of Plant-for-the-Planet

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Chris Lang on Why has the Financial Conduct Authority not taken down the website of the clone scam “Good Investment Advisors”?

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!