Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Is palm oil a threat to Brazil’s rainforest? No, says Marcello Brito, president of the Brazilian Palm Oil Association

Posted on 25 November 20141 December 2014
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

oilpalmTwo weeks ago, REDD-Monitor wrote about a report by Datu Research on the beef industry in the Brazilian Amazon. The report also looked at a potential new threat to Brazil’s forests, the expansion of oil palm plantations.

The headline of the post was “Oil palm set to take over from cattle ranching as the biggest threat to Brazil’s Amazon rainforest?”

Marcello Brito, the president of the Brazilian Palm Oil Association, responded in the comments. His answer to the question in the headline was “No”. He questioned the figures used in the Datu report which suggested that oil palm plantations were set to expand:

I don’t know where you got your information about the oil palm developments in Brazil, but I am sorry to say they are all wrong. The total oil palm plantation in the entire Amazon region is 161,000 ha, so there is no way to reach 322,000 ha by next year as you assure.

Brito offered to send the “real and trusted information” from the Brazilian Palm Oil Association when he returned from the Round Table on Sustainable Palm Oil meeting.

Yesterday REDD-Monitor received the following from Brito (posted here in full and with his permission):

Marcello Brito
Brazilian Palm Oil Association
President

 
Despite all the marketing made by Mr. Lula’s government during the launch of the Brazilian Oil Palm Development program in 2010, the numbers have shown the improvement in area is far away than what predicated by them. There are many reasons for it, and some are below listed:
 
a. You can only access banking credits /loans if you plantation is in the Ecological and Economical zoning area for oil palm cultivation. Initial investment in oil palm is highly expensive, in Brazil above US$ 5,000/ha and in this zoning, besides the illegality for any deforestation you must also keep 1 hectare of set aside forest for each hectare of oil palm, so you need to buy 2 hectares to plant only one. The full zoning area is mapped by satellite images. Outside the zoning area the law is 80/20, or 80% of set aside against 20% of plantation. Please see picture 1:
 


 
b. No deforestation. No area deforested after 2008 can be used for oil palm plantation. The picture 2 below shows that are no link between oil palm developments and the deforestation rate in Brazil.
 

 
As you can see, the relation between oil palm developments goes contrary to the rate of deforestation. In numbers not yet consolidated, in 2014 we are watching the growth on deforestation in the same time new oil palm plantations reached the slowest rate in the past 6 years.
 
c. Labor cost. Labor is the number one cost for any oil palm plantation anywhere in the world. This varies from 25 to 60% out of the total cost of one tone of crude palm oil (CPO). Brazil has the highest labor cost among the 44 oil palm producing countries. Please see picture 3.
 
03

 
d. Competition with foreigner producer. Nowadays Brazil imports more palm products than what is locally produced. The simple reason is cost. Production in Brazil is geographically located at the State of Para, 3,000 km away from the main consumer area that is the southeast of the country. Freight cost stands up to US$ 200/ton against US$ 65/ton for oil coming from Colombia, Malaysia and Indonesia. Please see picture 4.
 
04

 
In resume, despite all the good climate condition, land offer, millions of deforested land and man power, Brazil has not the economical attractiveness the sector needs to invest here. We do believe in a future we’ll be a medium size and important producers, but only after cheap areas for new developments as Asia and Africa become out of the scope.

 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

2 thoughts on “Is palm oil a threat to Brazil’s rainforest? No, says Marcello Brito, president of the Brazilian Palm Oil Association”

  1. regula hess says:
    3 December 2014 at 12:17 pm

    NON NON NON PLEASE

  2. Stefhan Gordon says:
    31 January 2016 at 2:50 pm

    This is all well and good, BUT Brazil is notorious for having a lot of regulations and incentives for various industries to preserve forest land with set asides, etc that aren’t enforced and routinely violated often with relative impunity. So why would it be any different with the palm oil industry especially with so much government corruption in Brazil?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“Where is the big demand push going to come from? And at present, it’s not so visible. The lack of significant commitments to emissions reductions means that we’re not going to see a big demand for the forestry progress. And I think that is the significant road-block that needs to be addressed.”

— Abyd Karmali, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, May 2011

Recent Posts

  • Anatomy of a ‘Nature-Based Solution’: Total oil, 40,000 hectares of disappearing African savannah, Emmanuel Macron, Norwegian and French ‘aid’ to an election-rigging dictator, trees to burn, secret contacts, and dumbstruck conservationists
  • Coalition for Rainforest Nations announces sale of 6,106 REDD credits from Papua New Guinea to Blackstone Energy Services
  • Carbonballs: Nigel Farage, carbon offset lobbyist
  • Kevin Conrad signs REDD deal with Papua New Guinea
  • Court of Appeal upholds conviction of Paul Moore, Michael Moore, and Haydon Driscoll, the men behind the Burbank of London carbon credit investment scam

Recent Comments

  • Rosa on Anatomy of a ‘Nature-Based Solution’: Total oil, 40,000 hectares of disappearing African savannah, Emmanuel Macron, Norwegian and French ‘aid’ to an election-rigging dictator, trees to burn, secret contacts, and dumbstruck conservationists
  • Sena Alouka on Anatomy of a ‘Nature-Based Solution’: Total oil, 40,000 hectares of disappearing African savannah, Emmanuel Macron, Norwegian and French ‘aid’ to an election-rigging dictator, trees to burn, secret contacts, and dumbstruck conservationists
  • Mattias Hjort on Anatomy of a ‘Nature-Based Solution’: Total oil, 40,000 hectares of disappearing African savannah, Emmanuel Macron, Norwegian and French ‘aid’ to an election-rigging dictator, trees to burn, secret contacts, and dumbstruck conservationists
  • Floyd Robinson on Anatomy of a deal: The April Salome REDD project in Papua New Guinea
  • Abel Ateu on The return of the carbon cowboys: How NIHT Inc failed to get free, prior and informed consent for REDD in New Ireland, Papua New Guinea

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!