Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Is palm oil a threat to Brazil’s rainforest? No, says Marcello Brito, president of the Brazilian Palm Oil Association

Posted on 25 November 20141 December 2014

oilpalmTwo weeks ago, REDD-Monitor wrote about a report by Datu Research on the beef industry in the Brazilian Amazon. The report also looked at a potential new threat to Brazil’s forests, the expansion of oil palm plantations.

The headline of the post was “Oil palm set to take over from cattle ranching as the biggest threat to Brazil’s Amazon rainforest?”

Marcello Brito, the president of the Brazilian Palm Oil Association, responded in the comments. His answer to the question in the headline was “No”. He questioned the figures used in the Datu report which suggested that oil palm plantations were set to expand:

I don’t know where you got your information about the oil palm developments in Brazil, but I am sorry to say they are all wrong. The total oil palm plantation in the entire Amazon region is 161,000 ha, so there is no way to reach 322,000 ha by next year as you assure.

Brito offered to send the “real and trusted information” from the Brazilian Palm Oil Association when he returned from the Round Table on Sustainable Palm Oil meeting.

Yesterday REDD-Monitor received the following from Brito (posted here in full and with his permission):

Marcello Brito
Brazilian Palm Oil Association
President

 
Despite all the marketing made by Mr. Lula’s government during the launch of the Brazilian Oil Palm Development program in 2010, the numbers have shown the improvement in area is far away than what predicated by them. There are many reasons for it, and some are below listed:
 
a. You can only access banking credits /loans if you plantation is in the Ecological and Economical zoning area for oil palm cultivation. Initial investment in oil palm is highly expensive, in Brazil above US$ 5,000/ha and in this zoning, besides the illegality for any deforestation you must also keep 1 hectare of set aside forest for each hectare of oil palm, so you need to buy 2 hectares to plant only one. The full zoning area is mapped by satellite images. Outside the zoning area the law is 80/20, or 80% of set aside against 20% of plantation. Please see picture 1:
 


 
b. No deforestation. No area deforested after 2008 can be used for oil palm plantation. The picture 2 below shows that are no link between oil palm developments and the deforestation rate in Brazil.
 

 
As you can see, the relation between oil palm developments goes contrary to the rate of deforestation. In numbers not yet consolidated, in 2014 we are watching the growth on deforestation in the same time new oil palm plantations reached the slowest rate in the past 6 years.
 
c. Labor cost. Labor is the number one cost for any oil palm plantation anywhere in the world. This varies from 25 to 60% out of the total cost of one tone of crude palm oil (CPO). Brazil has the highest labor cost among the 44 oil palm producing countries. Please see picture 3.
 
03

 
d. Competition with foreigner producer. Nowadays Brazil imports more palm products than what is locally produced. The simple reason is cost. Production in Brazil is geographically located at the State of Para, 3,000 km away from the main consumer area that is the southeast of the country. Freight cost stands up to US$ 200/ton against US$ 65/ton for oil coming from Colombia, Malaysia and Indonesia. Please see picture 4.
 
04

 
In resume, despite all the good climate condition, land offer, millions of deforested land and man power, Brazil has not the economical attractiveness the sector needs to invest here. We do believe in a future we’ll be a medium size and important producers, but only after cheap areas for new developments as Asia and Africa become out of the scope.

 

2 thoughts on “Is palm oil a threat to Brazil’s rainforest? No, says Marcello Brito, president of the Brazilian Palm Oil Association”

  1. regula hess says:
    3 December 2014 at 12:17 pm

    NON NON NON PLEASE

  2. Stefhan Gordon says:
    31 January 2016 at 2:50 pm

    This is all well and good, BUT Brazil is notorious for having a lot of regulations and incentives for various industries to preserve forest land with set asides, etc that aren’t enforced and routinely violated often with relative impunity. So why would it be any different with the palm oil industry especially with so much government corruption in Brazil?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Julien Kokelberg on Diffraction Limited: Another carbon credit boiler room bites the dust
  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Julien Kokelberg on Diffraction Limited: Another carbon credit boiler room bites the dust
  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Green Resources Guest post HBS Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples LifeMosaic Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union Finland France Gabon Germany Guyana India Indonesia Kenya Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2026 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!