Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Can REDD save the Areng Valley in Cambodia?

Posted on 28 October 201427 February 2015

The Areng Valley in southwest Cambodia has been home to the Chong indigenous people for more than 600 years. The area is also home to elephants, pileated gibbons, clouded leopards, and is one of the most important breeding sites for the endangered Siamese crocodile. But a proposed dam threatens the river, the forests and its inhabitants.

In March 2014, villagers, environmentalists and monks set up a protest camp to stop the dam builders from entering the valley. But in September, police arrested 11 environmental activists and took them to Koh Kong, the provincial capital.

The activists were released them after questioning, but the Royal Cambodian Army took over the protest camp.

A Chinese company, Sinohydro Resources, has the concession to build the dam. According to International Rivers,

China is offering to build revenue-generating hydropower projects and other energy-related infrastructure for Cambodia in exchange for a large future share in the country’s currently untapped natural resources, especially oil and gas.

If built, the reservoir behind the dam would flood the habitat of 31 endangered species. More than 1,500 people would be evicted from their homes.

The dam would destroy downstream fish habitats and impact the livelihoods of thousands of people. Fish form an important part of the local economy.

Sinohydro Resources is the third Chinese company to be involved in the project. In 2006, China Southern Power Grid signed an agreement with the Cambodian government to carry out a feasibility study. In 2010, China Guodian Corporation signed another agreement after China Southern Power Grid pulled out of the project.

In 2013, China Guodian Corporation pulled out, stating that the project was “economically unviable”.

One possible explanation for Sinohydro Resources’ interest in the dam was revealed by the Phnom Penh Post. Cambodian People’s Party senator Lao Meng Khin and his wife, Choeung Sopheap, are listed as third-party governors of Sinohydro (Cambodia) United Ltd.

According to the company’s registration papers, dated 4 April 2006, the firm is a local “affiliate” of Beijing-based Sinohydro Corp.

Lao Meng Khin is the owner of Shukaku Inc, the company behind the Beoung Kak Lake development in Phnom Penh, which resulted in the forcible eviction of more than 1,500 families.

Choeung Sopheap is the owner of the infamous Pheapimex group, which is linked to some of the most destructive logging operations in Cambodia. Pheapimex is also behind a series of massive land grabs, including a 300,000 hectare area slated to be cleared and converted to eucalyptus plantations.

Dam construction would involve building roads to the construction site, opening up areas of the Cardamom Protected Forest to loggers. Although logging is illegal in the protected area, valuable rosewood timber could easily be mixed with timber from the reservoir area.

Earlier this year, Kalyanee Mam, a Cambodian-US film maker visited the Areng Valley with a film crew. One of the villagers told her,

“Even if they piled money one meter above my head, I don’t want their Chinese money. I want to stay in my village. Even with all this money, I could only spend it in this life. I wouldn’t be able to pass it on to my grandchildren. I just want my village and my land for the future of my grandchildren.”

Another film maker, Rob Harbinson, also travelled to the Areng Valley earlier this year. His film “Defenders of the Spirit Forest” documents the villagers’ opposition to the dam and exposes how Fauna and Flora International, instead of opposing the dam, are attempting to relocate Siamese crocodiles from the river – against the wishes of the communities living there, to whom the crocodiles are sacred.

You can join the more than 90,000 people who have signed on to Rainforest Rescue’s petition to stop the dam, here.

A local NGO called Mother Earth is campaigning against the dam. A series of videos on the organisation’s Facebook page have been watched and shared thousands of times.

In one of the videos, a villager explains why the dam should not be built and the villagers’ environment should be preserved:

“It’s priceless, we have nature, jungles, rivers with fish in them… we don’t need money, all we need to do is put our net in the river for a short time, and we can have enough fish to eat. If we need vegetables we go into the forests and take what we need for cooking.”

The current status of the dam is not clear. At the beginning of October 2014, opposition politician Sam Rainsy announced that Prime Minister Hun Sen had told him that the decision to build the dam had been postponed. But the Minister of Mines and Energy says that the dam will be finished by 2020.

As with many other forest areas under threat, REDD is currently irrelevant to saving the Areng Valley.
 


PHOTO Credit: “A Threat to Cambodia’s Sacred Forests“, by Kalyanee Mam.
 

2 thoughts on “Can REDD save the Areng Valley in Cambodia?”

  1. David Swallow says:
    29 October 2014 at 5:55 pm

    So in what way is REDD irrelevant to curbing this? At first sight, it seems to fit an “avoided planned deforestation” REDD methodology. Now what you need is a project developer with political clout willing to channel the funds into conserving this forest and supporting communities and other stakeholders who are against the project.
    You didn’t justify your final sentence anywhere in the article.

  2. Chris Lang says:
    27 February 2015 at 10:58 pm

    @David Swallow (#1) – Sorry about the delay in responding. But four months later and there’s still no sign of a “project developer with political clout willing to channel the funds into conserving this forest and supporting communities”.

    Without your mythical project developer, isn’t REDD still irrelevant?

    Here’s the latest news on the Areng valley in the Cambodia Daily:

    PM Threatens Use of Rockets in Areng Valley

    The day after the government deported a foreign activist opposed to a proposed hydropower dam in Koh Kong province’s Areng Valley, Prime Minister Hun Sen on Tuesday invited activists in the valley to secede from Cambodia, but warned that rocket launchers could be deployed if they did…

    “Stop talking about Areng and let’s study clearly about it. And I have come up with an idea that no matter whether the study is clear or not, there will be no construction from now on until 2018,” Mr. Hun Sen said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!