• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Bai Shan Lin’s logging operations in Guyana: “Exploitation, disruption and destruction”

Posted on 19 August 201413 May 2015

Over the past two weeks, a series of articles has appeared in the Kaieteur News about Chinese logging company Bai Shan Lin’s operations in Guyana. The articles accuse Bai Shan Lin of operating illegally. The Guyana Forestry Commission responds that “there is no circumventing of Guyana’s logging laws by Bai Shan Lin”.

The first in the series of articles published by the Kaieteur News, dated 7 August 2014, has the headline, “Bai Shan Lin circumvents Guyana’s logging laws…Ships Billions $$$$ of high priced logs monthly” and it ran on the front cover of the newspaper:

Kaietuer News wrote that,

Even though Bai Shan Lin International Forest Development Inc. is yet to actually receive a logging licence, the company has teamed up with four companies in joint ventures to export billions of dollars worth in timber monthly.

James Singh, Guyana’s Commissioner of Forests, responded to what he describes as “this unprofessional article”. Singh argues that,

The GFC has very robust and functional systems, procedures and guidelines which all forest sector companies are audited against; if there are any breaches to these, appropriate action is taken based on the findings of a thorough investigation and in accordance with the forest law.

The following day, Kaieteur News ran a report of a visit to Kwakwani, Region 10, which included this quotation from a resident of the area:

“One thing you can’t stop dem Chinese with; dem does wuk hard. Is nah easy fuh prepare all them logs fuh shipment. You got to cut it, mark it and all duh. Me husband use to wuk with dem. Don’t think is no li’l operation. Dem does cut down everything dem lay eye pon.”

On 8 August 2014, another Kaieteur News article was based on an interview with Region 10 Chairman, Sharma Solomon. He explained that it is difficult to assess the total area of land that Bai Shan Lin is logging:

“There is a new arrangement that exists in the Region now where many associations and many loggers with concessions are in essence sub-leasing.”

On 10 August 2014, Joseph Harmon, Shadow Minister of Public Works from Guyana’s opposition political party, A Partnership for National Unity (APNU), called on Guyana’s President to sack the Minister of Natural Resources, Robert Persaud. Harmon referred to Guyana’s REDD agreement with Norway:

“The recent activities of Bai Shan Lin have compromised the ‘services’ that the Guyana rainforest is meant to provide and is hindering our economic development. So has the agreement between Guyana and Norway been brushed under the carpet for a much more beneficial package?”

On the same day, Kaietuer News quoted an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) official as saying that Bai Shan Lin has no permission to harvest or log. Currently Bai Shan Lin is having meetings with EPA, regarding “scoping”. The Guyana Forestry Commission denies that Bai Shan Lin is logging without the necessary approvals.

In June 2014, Bai Shan Lin submitted an application to the Environmental Protection Agency for permission for a large scale logging and sawmill operation. That application is still pending, according to Kaieteur News.

Another Kaieteur News article on 10 August 2014 looks at the equipment that Bai Shan Lin imported duty free to Guyana, including more than 200 hauler trucks, 50 bulldozers, and “a significant number of loaders”. The article also notes that the timber export figures have increased:

A look at export figures, unofficially supplied, indicated that for the first half of 2013, some 30,000 cubic meters of timber products were exported. For the first half of 2014, this figure rose to over 50,000 cubic meters.

On 12 August 2014, Kaieteur News reported on a helicopter flyover the previous day of Kwakwani and Ituni areas, Region 10:

From the air, it was an unbelievable sight. As far as the eye could see, at a location east of the Kwakwani bauxite operations, the logs were piled high, ready to be placed in containers. At least four 40-foot containers were being loaded at the time.

Kaieteur News published a series of photographs of the log sorting yard near Kwakwani:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The next day, Kaieteur News published another interview with Sharma Solomon, Region 10 Chairman. Solomon talked about “the exploitation, disruption and destruction of Region 10”.

On 17 August 2014, Kaieteur News published an article based on interviews with Amerindians in Kwebanna Village who worked for Bai Shan Lin, but who had not been paid.

In several of the articles about Bai Shan Lin, Kaieteur News refers to a 2012 presentation by Chu Wenze, chairman of Bai Shan Lin, that outlines his company’s plans for logging Guyana’s forests. The presentation was posted on REDD-Monitor in April 2013. A map in the presentation shows seven logging concessions covering a total area of 960,000 hectares.

In his response to the Kaieteur News, Commissioner of Forests James Singh states that Bai Shan Lin has “legal access to 627,072 ha”:

  • 344,849 ha as State Forest Exploratory Permits (SFEP’s) – an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA); a Forest Inventory (FI), and a Business Plan have to be submitted to the satisfaction of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and GFC before a Timber Sales Agreement (TSA) is granted which allows for full scale harvesting in accordance with GFC guidelines is approved
  • 274,053 ha as Timber Sales Agreement Joint Venture Agreements
  • 8,170 ha as State Forest Permissions

The articles in the Kaieteur News have raised serious questions about large scale logging operations in Region 10 and increasing timber exports from Guyana. Bai Shan Lin and the Guyana Forestry Commission argue that these operations are legal.

But the Transparency Institute of Guyana Inc has put out a statement asking for Bai Shan Lin’s contracts to be made public and to stop the logging operations.

In response to the Kaieteur News articles, Bai Shan Lin states that,

We intend to employ thousands of Guyanese once we are given an opportunity to realise our planned projects. We have successfully promoted species, which were never before marketed commercially. We entered the sector with the aim to contribute positively to the development of forestry in Guyana through injection of financial and capital resources and by further building Guyana’s export markets for forest products.

Which sounds a lot like business as usual and very little like reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. The industrial scale logging makes a mockery of Guyana’s much trumpeted US$250 million REDD deal with Norway.
 

4 thoughts on “Bai Shan Lin’s logging operations in Guyana: “Exploitation, disruption and destruction””

  1. Mike Persaud says:
    19 August 2014 at 6:27 pm

    President Jagdeo is one of world’s shrewdest leaders. He deserves another UN Award like “Champion of the Earth”.
    He has discovered that you can do a REDD deal with Norway (valued at US$250 million over 5-years) and still do industrial scale logging.

  2. Keith Williams says:
    20 August 2014 at 5:06 am

    What this demonstrates, in terms of the REDD deal with Norway, is how disastrous it becomes when donor countries enter into arrangement with Governments without carrying out due diligence about that Government, and ignoring an abundance of evidence in the public space of the likelihood of such Government engaging in exactly what we see today with BAI SHAN LIN.

    From the evidence of corruption that has Guyana on the bottom rung in Transparency International rankings, to what is in the public space in Guyana, even the blind would have figured that the PPP regime is not qualified to be a pardner in a REDD like project. But Norway, like many other nations, make assumptions about things in third world nations they would reject if the same was applied to examination of that country. And that is a pity.

  3. C Curtis says:
    20 August 2014 at 3:20 pm

    These people are vandalising the country. The PPP are the most unpatriotic leaders in the history of our country. AT this rate in twenty (20) years time, all our precious resources will belong to Foreigners, and our so-called leaders do not care. They are stuffing their pockets. A small wager that Kick-backs are being paid. The PPP seriously believes that being in power makes them above the law. No respect for the laws of the country. They govern on a mantra of expediency

  4. mark jacobs says:
    21 August 2014 at 6:24 pm

    by all indications bai shan lin is operating illegally in Guyana
    there is no paper work to show on what date and by whom bai shan lin was granted license to operating in Guyana
    —
    “Questions are continuing over hundreds of vehicles and scores of heavy duty equipment shipped in by an under-fire Chinese logging firm, but little answers have been forthcoming about who gave the okay.
    The vehicles, which included luxury rides like the high-end Lexus and an Infiniti Q series Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV), reportedly came into the country over the last few years. This is before the business plans of the Chinese company, Bai Shan Lin, had even been approved for two forest concessions.
    The applications are still pending.”
    http://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2014/08/21/who-granted-those-multi-million-duty-free-concessions-to-bai-shan-lin/

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Chris Lang on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Recent Posts

  • Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance letter to Pogio Ghate, Minister for Environment, Conservation and Climate Change
  • Ecomapuá Amazon REDD Project, Brazil: Pública investigation reveals Ecomapuá Conservação is selling “illegal” carbon offsets from land it does not own, without transferring the money to local communities
  • Response from Steve Zwick, Verra: “Verra will ask Kanaka Management Systems to cease and desist any actions that may mislead communities into thinking that Verra has not already rejected the project”
  • Response from Kanaka Management Services: “Please do not conduct legal trail or castigate REDD+ project developers on the website by writing text which shows the project developer in bad light”

Recent Comments

  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Chris Lang on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!