Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Biodiversity offsetting makes dreams come true – for developers

Posted on 10 July 201410 April 2015

Five years ago, the European environment commissioner Stavros Dimas warned that biodiversity loss posed a threat as serious as climate change. But the EU continues to lose biodiversity.

“The reasons that we are losing biodiversity are well known,” Dimas noted. “Destruction of habitats, pollution, over-exploitation, invasive species and, most recently, climate change.”

Instead of stopping the destruction of habitats, the EU is currently considering ways of allowing the destruction to continue while claiming to be addressing the loss of biodiversity. The plans is called “No Net Loss” and it relies on the hairbrained idea of biodiversity offsets. Developers will be allowed to destroy habitats as long as they pay to create a new habitat somewhere else.

Last year, more than 140 organisations signed a No to Biodiversity Offsetting statement.

Until 17 October 2014, the EU is holding a public consultation on biodiversity offsetting. Tell them why you oppose biodiversity offsetting.

The NGOs Carbon Trade Watch, Counterbalance, FERN, Re:Common and World Development Movement are campaigning against biodiversity offsetting. You can sign on to their letter to the European Commission here.

And they’ve produced this mockumentary to highlight the sheer lunacy of biodiversity offsetting:

While the video is fiction, several controversial biodiversity offset project are proposed in the UK. Last month, FERN and Friends of the Earth compiled a series of case studies of biodiversity offsets in the UK, France and Australia. Here are three of the UK cases:

Housing development, North Tyneside

The development will cause irreversible damage to Gosforth Park, a Site of Scientific Special Importance, one of the few remaining nearby green spaces not already converted to golf courses or other development. The housing plan was rejected by the planning authority, but Bellway Homes and the Environment Bank cooked up a biodiversity offsetting proposal that was approved by the Secretary of State.

High Speed 2 rail network

2014-07-10-134636_190x189_scrotForty ancient woodlands are threatened by the HS2. The developer behind the project has produced offsetting proposals. Sarah Walters, Local woodland manager of Alvecote Wood, points out, “Using offsetting to justify the destruction that HS2 will bring is simply wrong – you cannot replace these precious habitats.”

Motorway Service Station, Sheffied

2014-07-10-134647_349x371_scrotExtra Motorway Services has lodged an application to build a motorway service station, car park and slip road on top of Smithy Woods; new trees would be planted nearby as part of a biodiversity offsetting scheme. FERN and FoE point out that it will take more than 850 years before the new trees have the same ecological value as the ancient woodland that would be destroyed.
 

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Facebook

1 thought on “Biodiversity offsetting makes dreams come true – for developers”

  1. Dennis Bours says:
    10 July 2014 at 9:22 pm

    I filled out the public consultation and in the end you get the question if you want to be contacted by the EC for follow-up. But you are never asked for your email address…
    Guess that is how the EC communicates with its citizens; in one direction only. And we’ll have to Google the results in a year from now. A pity to see this happening in public consultation on such an important topic.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Chris Lang on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme
  • Tom Rayner on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme
  • Alan N. Connor on 30×30 target “not supported by the science”
  • Jeremy Sweet on 30×30 target “not supported by the science”
  • Chris Lang on Al Jazeera: Why are Tanzania’s Maasai being forced off their ancestral land?

Recent Posts

  • Statement from Kichwa Indigenous communities about the Cordillera Azul National Park REDD (PNCAZ) project: “No to the false climate solutions offered as ‘Nature Based Solutions’ and ‘carbon neutrality’ by oil and mining companies that pollute in other regions of the world, such as Shell, Total, BHP, and others, who buy carbon from the PNCAZ.”
  • 30×30 target “not supported by the science”
  • Aby L. Sène on “Land Grabs and Conservation Propaganda” in Africa
  • NIHT Inc’s misleading statements about the company’s REDD operations in Papua New Guinea
  • Global Forestry Investments scam: Andrew Skeene and Omari Bowers sentenced to 11 years in prison

Recent Comments

  • Chris Lang on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme
  • Tom Rayner on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme
  • Alan N. Connor on 30×30 target “not supported by the science”
  • Jeremy Sweet on 30×30 target “not supported by the science”
  • Chris Lang on Al Jazeera: Why are Tanzania’s Maasai being forced off their ancestral land?

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!