Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Gold mining in Guyana: Is this what the Low Carbon Development Strategy looks like?

Posted on 6 June 20146 June 2014

Gold mining in Guyana is booming. It’s the country’s biggest export. Last year Guyana exported gold worth US$1 billion. But government is failing to address the serious environmental and social impacts caused by gold mining.

Much of the mining is currently small-scale. A 2007 report by Harvard Law School’s Human Rights Programme found that the government had failed to regulate wildcat miners and failed to protect the rights of indigenous peoples. Gold mining had polluted rivers with mercury, increased malaria and caused deforestation.

Bonnie Docherty of Harvard’s Human Rights Programme said,

“Medium- and small-scale gold mining as currently practised and regulated inflict severe environmental, health, and social damage on the areas and people near mining operations. Our observations confirmed that the areas around mines resemble a moonscape of barren, mounded sand and mud. Since small-scale miners typically wash the topsoil away in order to get to the gold-bearing clayey soil underneath, the sites of former mines are quite infertile and incapable of supporting regenerated rainforest.”

In 2009, Bharrat Jagdeo, Guyana’s then-president, released his Low Carbon Development Strategy. While the LCDS acknowledges the importance of limiting deforestation and forest degradation from gold mining, and in the most recent update of the LCDS (March 2013), the government claims that,

“since the LCDS was launched, the Government has redoubled efforts to ensure that mining practices are continually improved and aligned with international best practice over time.”

Recently, Mark Jacobs, a Guyanese blogger, flew over Region 1 Barima Waini, Region 7 Cuyuni Mazaruni, and Region 8 Potaro Siparuni. His trip was nothing to do with gold mining, but he has posted 95 photographs of forests, rivers and mining operations on his blog.

The “moonscape of barren, mounded sand and mud” that Harvard’s Human Rights Programme found has expanded. Here’s a sample of the photographs:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Guyana’s record with large-scale gold mining is, if anything, even worse. Commissioned in 1993, the Omai gold mine, was a joint venture between Cambior Inc. (Canada, 65% share), Golden Star Resources (USA, 30%) and Guyana’s government (5%). The mine became internationally notorious two years later when a tailings dam failed and 120 million gallons of cyanide-treated mining waste poured into the Omai and Essequibo Rivers. The mine continued operations until 2005. In 2011, the mine was reopened, run by a Canadian company, Mahdia Gold Corp.

More large scale gold mines are to come. In May 2014, an Australian company called Troy Resources Limited announced its plans to invest US$90 million in a gold mine in Guyana’s north-west Cuyuni region. Another Canadian company, Guyana Goldfields Inc, plans to open a US$205 million gold mine this year.

In 2011, Vemund Olson of Rainforest Foundation Norway told the BBC that,

“I am yet to see any concrete action by the Guyanese government to make sure more mining does not lead to increased deforestation in the long term.”

Three years on, nothing has changed, except that the damage to Guyana’s indigenous peoples, forests and rivers has increased.

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Facebook

4 thoughts on “Gold mining in Guyana: Is this what the Low Carbon Development Strategy looks like?”

  1. Dennis del Castillo Torres says:
    8 June 2014 at 8:13 pm

    I am positive that there are many hard way learning lessons from the Guyana´s gold mining experience that national authorities in Latin América need to learn from.

  2. Tony James. says:
    12 June 2014 at 1:44 am

    These photos are just a ‘drop in the ocean’. The LCDS is definitely not being implemented in the way it was said it would be. This initiative is bringing in money to Guyana but there is no transparency and accountability of how it is being utilised in the best interest if Guyana especially the Indigenous Peoples. The Marudi and Para Bara areas in the South Rupununi, would be an eye opener as to what is happening in the head waters of Essequibo. This deforestation and degradation was brought out in a side event we from the Amerindian Peoples Association carried out at the recently concluded UNPFII 2014. Immediately on her return from this event the Minister of Amerindian Affairs criticised our side event. My take is THE TRUTH HURTS and cameras don’t BLINK. My recommendation is that we the Indigenous Peoples find some funding and charter an aircraft to fly over Guyana and take arial photos and show the world what is taking place in Guyana. Thanks Mark for posting.

  3. Mark says:
    8 March 2017 at 3:15 am

    I was just in Guyana an the Essequibo and there are dredge miners there polluting the river and the jungle scape is blotted by gold mining scars. Boycott anything gold please

  4. Lois Masur says:
    12 September 2017 at 2:56 pm

    Reading this makes me ashamed to be Canadian. I find it appalling that Canadian corporations are allowed to conduct ourselves wtih utter disregard for locals, and outside Canadian labour and environmental law, in their rape and pillage of foreign lands. Imperials bastards.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Chris Lang on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Kay on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Ian on Oakmount Management Partners, Oakwood Financial Management, Oakmount and Partners, Baron Traders, Emerald Knight, Oakmount Global Management, MH Carbon, DMD Media, Morgan Forbes, and Centrium Capital Markets: A network of scam companies
  • Chris Lang on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme
  • Tom Rayner on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme

Recent Posts

  • Indigenous Sengwer urge donors “to stop funding conservation projects that are stealing our land and destroying our life”
  • The return of the Kamula Doso REDD project in Papua New Guinea: This time run by Mayur Resources, a mining company, and Santos, an oil and gas company
  • Oakland Institute and Survival International call on UNESCO and IUCN to cut ties with the Tanzanian government over the most recent human rights abuses against the Maasai in Loliondo
  • Statement from Kichwa Indigenous communities about the Cordillera Azul National Park REDD (PNCAZ) project: “No to the false climate solutions offered as ‘Nature Based Solutions’ and ‘carbon neutrality’ by oil and mining companies that pollute in other regions of the world, such as Shell, Total, BHP, and others, who buy carbon from the PNCAZ.”
  • 30×30 target “not supported by the science”

Recent Comments

  • Chris Lang on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Kay on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Ian on Oakmount Management Partners, Oakwood Financial Management, Oakmount and Partners, Baron Traders, Emerald Knight, Oakmount Global Management, MH Carbon, DMD Media, Morgan Forbes, and Centrium Capital Markets: A network of scam companies
  • Chris Lang on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme
  • Tom Rayner on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!