Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

APRIL’s ecological armageddon continues in Sumatra and North Kalimantan

Posted on 5 June 201429 September 2015
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Aerial photographs by Greenpeace reveal that Asia Pacific Resources International Limitied continues to clear peat forest in Sumatra, despite the company’s forest policy.

APRIL introduced its Sustainable Forest Management Policy in January 2014. APRIL claims that the recent logging complies with its forest conservation policy. This may well be true, since the policy allows new plantations to be established until December 2014 and timber from rainforests to be used in its pulp mills until 2020. Zulfahmi, a Forest Campaigner at Greenpeace Southeast Asia, described the policy as “a licence to continue forest clearance”.

The logging is taking place on peatlands inside a pulpwood concession on Pulau Padang in Riau Province. APRIL’s subsidiary PT Riau Andalan Pulp and Paper is clearing the forest and draining the peatlands in order to plant monoculture acacia plantations to feed APRIL’s pulp mills.

This, then, is what APRIL’s “sustainable forest management” looks like:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

In 2011, Bill Laurance, a forest scientist with James Cook University in Australia, visited APRIL’s operations in Sumatra. He described what he saw as almost an “ecological armageddon”. When he returned to Australia, Laurance said he “felt at some gut level really disturbed. It’s just the sense that there’s an environmental travesty ongoing here”. Three years later, the destruction is still happening, but now under the label of “sustainable forest management”.

APRIL’s logging operations are not limited to Sumatra. In April 2014, GAPETA Borneo, Kalimantan Forest Monitoring NGOs (RPHK) and WWF-Indonesia East Kalimantan carried out an investigation into APRIL’s operations in North Kalimantan. The three groups urged APRIL to stop forest clearing and peat canal drainage. APRIL denied that it was doing anything wrong.

In a statement, Kamiruddin, head of GAPETA Borneo, said,

“It appears that APRIL’s sustainability commitments are only on paper, but not in the forest. Their deforestation and peat canal excavation should be stopped as they cause serious environmental damages including carbon emissions. Deforestation on deep peat should also be stopped because it is protected by law.”

Meanwhile, Fauna and Flora International is working with APRIL to set up an ecosystem restoration project covering just over 20,000 hectares on the Kampar Peninsula in Sumatra. Muslim Rasyid, the coordinator of Jikalahari, an NGO based in Riau province, isn’t impressed. He told the Jakarta Globe that,

“What we see is that this is no more than greenwashing as they are still cutting trees elsewhere, such as Pulau Padang. We know RAPP’s track record of wood exploitation. Suddenly they’re changing the direction of their business to restoration?”

In January 2014, when APRIL released its Sustainable Forest Management Policy, the company announced the endorsement of Stig Traavik, Norway’s Ambassador to Indonesia. In an APRIL press release, Traavik was quoted as saying,

“We want to congratulate APRIL on its new Sustainable Forest Management Policy, in particular APRIL’s promise to involve local communities and ensure the environmental integrity of the policy. Openness and independent review will be key for this policy to succeed. We are now eager to see how APRIL will follow up this policy in practice.”

REDD-Monitor looks forward to reading Traavik’s response to APRIL’s ongoing destructive logging in Sumatra and North Kalimantan.
 


PHOTO Credit: Ulet Ifansasti, Greenpeace.
 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“What we wanted to accomplish was to, firstly, quantify the value of a living forest; then, by putting in place mechanisms to measure the amount of carbon sequestered and structures that would avoid deforestation and degradation, protect its unique biodiversity.”

— Ciaran Kelly, CEO of Celestial Green Ventures, February 2012

Recent Posts

  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Some questions for Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of Plant-for-the-Planet

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Chris Lang on Why has the Financial Conduct Authority not taken down the website of the clone scam “Good Investment Advisors”?

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!