Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Ecuador’s continued conflict over oil drilling, indigenous rights and biodiversity

Posted on 3 June 20143 June 2014

Last month, Ecuador’s government approved permits for oil drilling in the Yasuní National Park. The drilling will be carried out by a subsidiary of the national oil company, Petroamazonas and will start in 2016.

The permits are in the Ishpingo-Tambococha-Tiputinin (ITT) block, an area covering a total of 100,000 hectares, or 10% of the Yasuní National Park.

Seven years ago, Ecuador’s president Rafael Correa announced that the country would leave the oil below the Yasuní rainforest, if the world paid US$3.6 billion, or half the market value of the 850 million barrels of oil in the ITT block. By 2013, when the money hadn’t appeared, Correa announced that “The world has failed us”, and that oil drilling in Yasuní would take place.

Opponents of the oil drilling started a petition – if they reached 583,323 signatures (5% of the electoral roll), Ecuador would hold a national referendum on whether to drill for oil in the ITT block. In April 2014, the coalition of groups calling themselves YASunidos handed in about 850,000 signatures.

Ten days later, the National Electoral Council announced that only 359,762 signatures were legitimate. The NEC said that signatures were repeated, fictional or incomplete names were used, names were not on the electoral roll, the weight of paper was wrong, signatures were in blue ink (instead of black), and identity numbers were written outside the boxes provided.

Environmentalists and indigenous groups claimed fraud and interference on the part of the government. The government rejected the claims. Martin Carbonell, a spokesperson for YASunidos told the Guardian,

“People are aware that this has damaged democracy. Before this, they had some confidence in government. This was the moment when people could say this is not a democratic government.”

The Yasuní initiative raises several issues that are relevant to climate change and REDD:

  • It’s an environmental blackmail scheme, or “You pay, or we’ll drill”. When the money didn’t appear, the forest turns out to be unprotected.
  • As a model for keeping the oil in the soil, it would be extremely expensive. If Ecuador gets paid for not drilling a comparatively small amount of oil, what happens when Russia or Saudi Arabia says, “You pay, or we drill”?
  • Yasuní would not reduce global greenhouse gas emissions. The demand for oil is still there and oil consumers will simply buy the oil from somewhere else.

Not all indigenous peoples in Ecuador are opposed to oil drilling. The Waorani are one of the indigenous peoples living in the Yasuní National Park. David Irumenga, a Waorani community leader, recently spoke to the press in Quito:

“I am here supporting the government’s proposal to exploit the petroleum in the ITT block [of Yasuní]. We must leave poverty behind through education, transport, healthcare and housing – not just us, but the entire nation of Ecuador.”

President Correa also argues that the money from oil drilling in Yasuní would help poverty alleviation, particularly in the Amazon, the region with the highest incidence of poverty in Ecuador.

Christian Tym is a PhD student in Anthropology and Latin American Studies at the University of Sydney, currently carrying out research in Ecuador. He argues that there is a progressive case to “Drill Baby, Drill!” in Ecuador. He points out that in Ecuador “two-thirds of all energy comes from renewables” and the country “has grown its economy at above the regional average while reducing inequality more than any other country”. He also argues that,

There is a huge difference between drilling for oil in a neoliberal corporatocracy and drilling in Ecuador, where the public collects 85c of every dollar in profit.

But Tym skips over Correa’s record on human rights or the fact that it has closed down Fundación Pachamama – one of the organisations campaigning against oil drilling in Yasuní.
As this map shows, the ITT block is just one of the oil blocks in the Yasuní National Park:

In August 2013, Petroamazonas was caught on film secretly building an oil access road through block 31, west of ITT. Professional photographers Ivan Kashinsky and Karla Gachet came across the road in August 2012, while they were on assignment for National Geographic magazine. Their aerial photographs of the road are published on mongabay.com.

With new road building for oil inside the Yasuní, environmental and social impacts, such as new settlers, illegal logging and over-hunting, will almost inevitably follow. The Yasuní is one of the most biodiverse areas in the world – perhaps the most biodiverse in the world. The Tagaeri and Taromenane are semi-nomadic indigenous people living in voluntary isolation in the Yasuní. The roads could reach right up to the edge of their forest. And Ecuador has a bad record of oil spills.

As usual, REDD is irrelevant in the discussion about saving the Yasuní National Park. REDD takes place in parallel with oil drilling. If it takes place at all, that is. Shortly after Germany criticised Ecuador’s plans to drill for oil in the Yasuní, President Correa cancelled a €34.5 million German REDD project.


PHOTO Credit: Ryan Killackey, “A Journey to the Heart of Ecuador’s Yasuni”.

2 thoughts on “Ecuador’s continued conflict over oil drilling, indigenous rights and biodiversity”

  1. Bruce Rich says:
    22 June 2014 at 8:59 pm

    A really good, succinct summary of the issues–there has been a lot of misleading rhetoric and obfuscation about the fundamental dynamics and context of the Yasuni proposal. I would add that some years ago there was a GEF of grant of several million dollars to the Ecuadorian government to strengthen protection of Yasuni and several other protected areas. But then afterwards came the threats to drill in Yasuni unless much larger amounts from donors would be forthcoming.

  2. Ken Proud says:
    23 June 2014 at 2:56 am

    If a petition is invalid because identity numbers were printed outside the block provided will the Government invalidate the drilling licence if the company looks for oil outside the ITT block?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!