Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

REDD texts on safeguards information system and drivers of deforestation will not be re-opened at COP19 in Warsaw

Posted on 13 November 201327 May 2014

The UN climate negotiations started this week in Warsaw. For the second year in a row, the negotiations coincide with a massive typhoon hitting the Philippines. Last year at Doha, Philippine negotiator Yeb Saño asked, “Please, let Doha be remembered as the place where we found the political will to turn things around.”

Typhoon Haiyan is one of the strongest storms ever recorded, with up to 10,000 people feared dead in the town of Tacloban alone. Speaking on Monday at the UNFCCC, Yeb Saño gave another moving speech (available in full on Democracy Now!):

What my country is going through as a result of this extreme climate event is madness. The climate crisis is madness. Mr. President, we can stop this madness right here in Warsaw. We cannot sit and stay helpless staring at this international climate stalemate. It is now time to raise ambition and take action. We need an emergency climate pathway.

Unfortunately, addressing climate change is not on the UNFCCC’s agenda. PwC estimates that at current rates we will have used up this century’s climate budget by 2034:

Even doubling the current 0.7% rate of decarbonisation puts us on a path consistent with the most extreme scenario presented by the IPCC, and potential warming of around 4°C by 2100.

Even before the meeting in Warsaw started, Christiana Figueres, executive director of the UNFCCC, said that carbon budgets were a “good scientific exercise” but that it be politically too difficult for carbon budgets to be the basis for negotiations.

Yesterday in Warsaw, the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technical Advice (SBSTA) REDD+ Contact group met. In part because of the non-existent negotiations on addressing climate change, the negotiations on REDD seem to be moving along swiftly.

The REDD+ Safeguards Working Group, a group of 25 civil society and indigenous organisations, is in Warsaw monitoring and providing analysis on the forest negotiations. The Group reports that,

Text on Safeguards Information System and drivers of deforestation and forest degradation will not be re-opened. Text has been forwarded to the SBSTA Chair for adoption by the COP.

Concerns about safeguards reporting and drivers of deforestation were acknowledged by several countries, including Norway, Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia, Sudan (for the least developed countries), Colombia, Brazil, USA, Mexico and Ecuador.

The latest text on Safeguards Information System and drivers of deforestation and forest degradation is available on the UNFCCC website.

Anggalia Putri, of the Indonesian NGO HuMa, gave a brief presentation on behalf of the Accra Caucus, posted here in full:

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for the opportunity. My name is Anggalia Putri, speaking on behalf of Accra Caucus on Forests and Climate Change.
Distinguished delegates,
There are two urgent issues that we feel merit attention of all of you who are currently negotiating on our behalf: the text on drivers of deforestation and on safeguards information system. We strongly feel that the draft decision texts from Bonn on the two issues are inadequate regarding the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities. On drivers, the current text suggests that local communities and indigenous peoples are the main drivers of forest loss, rather than large corporate producers and international commodity chains. We are extremely worried this text could pose serious risks for indigenous peoples and local community rights. There is ample evidence showing that protecting indigenous peoples’ livelihoods is an effective way to halt deforestation and forest degradation. These efforts need to be recognized, and the rights and territories of indigenous peoples and local communities respected.
Regarding safeguards, it is our view that effective safeguards implementation is fundamental to the success of all forest policies, including REDD+, and it depends on a robust monitoring and reporting system. We have the SIS now and its robustness in turn depends on the requirement for reporting, which must include an initial provision of information on how safeguards are addressed and respected before results-based payments can be accessed, irrespective of the timing of National Communications. In order to access results-based finance, countries must first provide information on how safeguards have been applied. Adequate support must also be provided for this with the full and effective participation of stakeholders.
In conclusion, we appeal to you, dear delegates, to reopen these draft decisions so that decisions from this COP-19 reflect that the livelihoods of forest dependent peoples are supported and not targeted as drivers and so that they state explicitly that the provision of information on safeguards will precede any results-based payments.

Thank you.

2 thoughts on “REDD texts on safeguards information system and drivers of deforestation will not be re-opened at COP19 in Warsaw”

  1. Sonia Weasley says:
    26 May 2014 at 6:50 pm

    Thanks for this post, especially the presentation is insightful for as to why several NGOs opposed the decision.

    Do you remember/know in what context this presentation was given?

  2. Chris Lang says:
    27 May 2014 at 9:47 am

    @Sonia Weasley (#1) – Thanks for the question (and sorry it’s not clear from the post). The Accra Caucus presentation was an intervention during the SBSTA discussions on REDD in Warsaw, on 12 November 2013.

    The Accra Caucus is a coalition of more than 100 non-governmental organisations from 30 countries. It was formed in August 2008, in Accra, Ghana at a meeting organised to discuss issues and concerns associated with REDD. Click here for more posts involving the Accra Caucus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!